Georgia Governor Vetoes Terrible Cybersecurity Law That Would Have Criminalized Security Research

from the buried-swiftly-with-all-the-credit-it-deserved dept

Georgia legislators chose to deal with blowback from from some election security gaffes (and the mysterious wiping of servers containing evidence sought in a lawsuit) by introducing a godawful “cybersecurity” bill that would have criminalized security research. The bill passed by the state Senate criminalized password sharing and “unauthorized” access, even if there was no malicious intent.

This legislation ran into opposition from everyone but its crafters.

With EFF’s support, Electronic Frontiers Georgia, a member of the Electronic Frontier Alliance, mobilized at every stage of the legislative process. They met with members of the state senate and house, “worked the rope” (a term for waiting outside the legislative chambers for lawmakers to emerge), held up literal “red cards” during hearings, and hosted a live stream panel. Nearly 200 Georgia residents emailed the governor demanding a veto, while 55 computer professionals from around the country submitted a joint letter of opposition. Professors organized at Georgia Tech to call upon the governor to veto the bill.

The mobilization worked. Governor Nathan Deal has vetoed the attempt to make security research illegal. His statement on the veto indicates Deal still feels some sort of law is needed to handle malicious hacking, but this badly-written bill isn’t it.

Under the proposed legislation, it would be a crime to intentionally access a computer or computer network with knowledge that such access is without authority. However, certain components of the legislation have led to concerns regarding national security implications and other potential ramifications. Consequently, while intending to protect against online breaches and hacks, SB 315 may inadvertently hinder the ability of government and private industries to do so.

After careful review and consideration of this legislation, including feedback from other stakeholders, I have concluded more discussion is required before enacting this cyber security legislation.

Any discussion at all would be nice. Voter security can’t be fixed by placing security researchers and password sharers at risk of being fined or jailed. Nothing about this bill would have made anything in Georgia more secure. But it would have resulted in the exodus of security talent — the last thing the state needs if it wishes to become the “leader in cyber technology” its governor believes it can be.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Georgia Governor Vetoes Terrible Cybersecurity Law That Would Have Criminalized Security Research”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Sometimes the good guys win

Do not celebrate too quickly. Something like this happened with the campus carry bill. The Governor vetoed the first one, but the second one he signed.

How is that example relevant? Unless spectacularly poorly written (like the "privacy" laws that say you have no privacy, or the "forfeiture reform" laws that explicitly state there is no redress to bogus forfeitures), a campus carry bill is usually a good idea. This bill was an extremely bad idea.

Anonymous Coward says:

out of curiosity, who was the instigator of this proposed bill? what was he/she/them going to get out of it if it became law? no politician does something like this unless there is a personal benefit, so how about naming and shaming those concerned?

and thanks to the governor for vetoing it!! lets hope it doesn’t get approved once it has been made even worse (as it undoubtedly will, just like every other useless piece of legislature that is pushed for, particularly by the Entertainments industries!)!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Some people refuse to see the logic that the knowledge to combat hackers actually need to come from somewhere. My teacher in my IT education taught us how hackers in the past has broken systems, how to do it ourselves and showed us the tools we would need.
For most that I told this was reasonable, but there are just those that refused to understand how we need this knowledge in order to protect against it. These are probably the ones who will write their elected officials about how the education system is producing hackers and criminals. I am not sure how their thoughts work, but I am guessing that they think we just react when it happens and otherwise read some good censored content in a book.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...