NSA Admits It Has AGAIN Been Deleting Evidence Needed In Long-Running Surveillance Lawsuit

from the someday-the-NSA-will-get-a-handle-on-this-whole-'managing-data'-thing dept

The NSA is once again deleting data it’s been ordered to retain for ongoing lawsuits. This isn’t the first time. The Jewel v. NSA lawsuit — which is nearing its tenth year in litigation — has been ground zero for multiple NSA screw-ups. The shutdown of the Section 215 program resulted in some perhaps deliberate confusion within the agency. At first, the NSA decided it should just purge its 215 collections, taking with it anything that might be used against it in the Jewel case. Then it decided it would keep everything, giving it the opportunity to trawl pre-reform data banks for anything it might find useful, while simultaneously stiff-arming plaintiffs’ requests for surveillance records.

Despite angering multiple judges with its inability to follow simple court orders, the NSA is back in front of a judge trying to explain why it has failed yet again to retain data relevant to the Jewel case.

[T]he NSA told U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White in a filing on Thursday night and another little-noticed submission last year that the agency did not preserve the content of internet communications intercepted between 2001 and 2007 under the program Bush ordered. To make matters worse, backup tapes that might have mitigated the failure were erased in 2009, 2011 and 2016, the NSA said.

That’s the problem with collecting all the stuff. Where do you put it? Sooner or later, you have to get rid some stuff to make room for the new stuff. But rest assured, the NSA feels just awful it may have deleted crucial evidence.

“The NSA sincerely regrets its failure to prevent the deletion of this data,” NSA’s deputy director of capabilities, identified publicly as “Elizabeth B.,” wrote in a declaration filed in October. “NSA senior management is fully aware of this failure, and the Agency is committed to taking swift action to respond to the loss of this data.”

In the update Thursday, another NSA official said the data were deleted during a broad, housecleaning effort aimed at making space for incoming information.

Evidence spoliation d/b/a performance enhancements. That’s the NSA way. The NSA claims potential evidence wasn’t “targeted” but possibly was deleted. In other words: incidental deletion. This follows the NSA’s assertions possible evidence was secured and fully backed up. Supposedly magnetic tapes containing communications and metadata pertinent to the Jewel case had been physically set aside and segregated from the NSA’s other backups and data collections. That now appears not to have been the case.

The NSA is “preserving magnetic/digital tapes of the Internet content intercepted under the [PSP] since the inception of the program,” [NSA official Miriam P.] wrote, adding that “the NSA has stored these tapes in the offices of its General Counsel.”

The agency now says, “regrettably,” that the statement “may have been only partially accurate when made.”

The NSA is now making “extraordinary” efforts to recover the stuff it said wouldn’t be erased. As the EFF (representing the plaintiff) has pointed out (repeatedly), missing evidence should be presumed to be favorable to the person asking for it to be handed over. Anything the NSA can’t come up with should bolster the plaintiff’s case. The NSA can’t plausibly argue the plaintiff was never targeted or swept up incidentally in its collections if it doesn’t have a copy of this data that shows otherwise.

Any person offering up shrugs and apologies instead of requested evidence could expect to be sanctioned by the court. Somehow I doubt the NSA will be subject to the same rules that apply to everyone else.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “NSA Admits It Has AGAIN Been Deleting Evidence Needed In Long-Running Surveillance Lawsuit”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
17 Comments
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Wouldn't it be loverly...

…If the entire management of the NSA was found in contempt of court and placed in prison until the required documents were produced. What, those documents are gone? Expect a lifetime of incarceration. Then, the next group placed in management positions at the NSA might not be so cavalier in their actions.

That One Guy (profile) says:

NSA: 'And what are you going to do about it, idiot with a gavel?'

The Jewel v. NSA lawsuit — which is nearing its tenth year in litigation — has been ground zero for multiple NSA screw-ups.

If anyone believes those were ‘accidents’ I’ve got some positively stunning solar(in that it’s literally on the surface of the sun) property I’d love to sell them.

At this point they might as well bring a laptop into court, hook it up to a projector so everyone can see what’s on the screen, show the entire court that it’s connected to the files and backups related to the case, and then deliberately start deleting them in front of everyone, saying ‘oops’ or ‘how’d that happen?’ after each file/folder deletion.

Same result, same blatant act of flipping everyone in court the bird, but at least they’d be honest and open about it. Until the judge grows a spine and starts throwing people in jail for contempt of court, this will keep happening, because really, why would they stop?

Coyne Tibbets says:

To infinity and beyond

NSA: “Oops!’

Judge: “You guys are pressing the limits of my judicial patience. But I will overlook it this time.”

NSA: “Oops!’

Judge: “You guys are pressing the limits of my judicial patience. But I will overlook it this time.”

NSA: “Oops!’

Judge: “You guys are pressing the limits of my judicial patience. But I will overlook it this time.”

NSA: “Oops!’

Judge: “You guys are pressing the limits of my judicial patience. But I will overlook it this time.”

NSA: “Oops!’

Judge: “You guys are pressing the limits of my judicial patience. But I will overlook it this time.”

To infinity and beyond…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...