New DOJ Policy Restricts Use Of Warrant/Subpoena Gag Orders

from the finally dept

It appears public pressure — coming in the form of lawsuits and gag order challenges — has finally had an effect on the DOJ. Ellen Nakashima is reporting the Justice Department will no longer attach indefinite gag orders to routine requests for data and communications.

The Justice Department has issued new guidelines aimed at providing more transparency around prosecutors’ secret demands for customer data stored on tech firms’ servers.

The binding guidance, approved last week by Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, ends the routine imposition of gag orders barring companies from telling customers that their email or other records have been turned over in response to legal demands.

It also bans — in most cases — indefinite gag orders that forbid a company from ever telling users that their data have been searched.

This new guidance has resulted in Microsoft dropping its lawsuit against the DOJ over its gag orders. This will likely be followed by similar dismissals. There are, of course, some exceptions to the guidelines that will still allow the DOJ to deploy gag orders. But the policy at least (mostly) forbids the FBI (and others) from gagging companies forever.

The new guidance requires prosecutors to tailor their applications for secrecy orders to ensure that they are necessary, and explain why. For instance, a prosecutor might fear that the target will destroy data if he or she learns of the probe. Or the target might try to flee. The assessment must be “individualized and meaningful.”

And now there is a time limit: “Barring exceptional circumstances,” a gag order may be sought for “one year or less.”

Now, for the bad news. Anything the DOJ can claim is national security-related will probably still come with a gag order attached. In addition, this guidance has zero effect on the FBI’s favorite paperwork, National Security Letters. The upside is normal warrants and subpoenas won’t be treated as requests so sensitive no one should be able to talk about them, much less inform targets their data/communications are being sought.

The new policy also contains a couple of advantages for the DOJ. First, the more lawsuit dismissals this leads to, the less chance there is of a court handing down a precedential ruling severely restricting the use of gag orders. Second, the voluntary nature allows the DOJ to resume its indiscriminate deployment of gag orders at any time. While this development is welcome, it should be noted this is an area where legislation would be far more effective than internal policy shifts if US tech companies would like to see the change become permanent.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: facebook, google, microsoft, twitter

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “New DOJ Policy Restricts Use Of Warrant/Subpoena Gag Orders”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
9 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Law vs Guidelines

“The Justice Department has issued new guidelines”

Justice Department is supposed to obey formal law … not invent its own interpretations of the law (“guidelines”)

Plus, new guidelines were reluctantly issued because the old guidelines were unlawful. DOJ personnel who acted unlawfully with the old policy should be prosecuted

Anonymous Coward says:

Something I’ve always wondered about NSL’s. Are you bound by them as soon as you’ve officially received them much like you are considered “served” and have a legal responsibility to show up in court when you receive a subpoena, or are you only bound by them once you’ve actually opened and read the letter like agreeing to an NDA? What would happen if everyone at a company just refused to open or read anything from the FBI? Obviously, they wouldn’t know what’s being requested, but could they then legally go out and say, “we don’t know what’s in them, but the FBI keeps trying to send us letters”.

Isma'il says:

Everyone Wins Except for the People!

As many have suggested, this is a mere smokescreen. Think about it for a minute:

With this new “guideline,” the DOJ can appear to be “responsive” to public concern, without actually changing their underlying behaviour. They’ll just “reclassify” everything in order to impose the gag order again.

Also, the major tech companies, like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and ISPs get to look good because of the apparent *fighting for your rights* act which they will say resulted in this new “guideline” issued by the DOJ.

In reality, this changes nothing, because either the tech companies and ISPs will require so much paperwork to be filed so that people can find out if they’re a target of surveillance, the DOJ will just reclassify a majority of these gag orders as NSLs, or both.

No matter which way the chips fall, the ordinary citizen loses.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...