Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As 'Leverage' Over CNN

from the the-peanut-butter-and-jelly-of-bullshit dept

On the campaign trail, you might recall that Donald Trump threatened to block AT&T’s $89 billion acquisition of Time Warner, insisting that the deal was “an example of the power structure” he was fighting, because it would deliver “too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.” Granted he subsequently appointed an FCC chairman in Ajit Pai who’s little more than a rubber stamp for companies like AT&T, and nominated an antitrust boss already on record stating he has no real problems with the merger, leading most analysts to believe the deal will be approved anyway.

There are of course a number of legitimate reasons to block the deal, including concerns that AT&T will make licensing access to necessary programming more difficult than ever for streaming video competitors. Or the fact that AT&T’s using its dominance in wireless to give Time Warner content an unfair advantage over competitors via usage caps and overage fees (aka “zero rating”). It would be foolish to think a company with such a rich history of anti-competitive and anti-consumer behavior wouldn’t use this greater size and leverage anti-competitively.

But these are complicated nuances it’s not-terribly-likely the current President actually understands. Instead, his focus in recent months has been the fact that he doesn’t like Time Warner-owned CNN’s critical coverage of his administration, and, according to the New York Times, hopes to use the deal as “leverage” to force CNN to soften its critcism of the President as part of his broader assault on the media:

“White House advisers have discussed a potential point of leverage over their adversary, a senior administration official said: a pending merger between CNN?s parent company, Time Warner, and AT&T. Mr. Trump?s Justice Department will decide whether to approve the merger, and while analysts say there is little to stop the deal from moving forward, the president?s animus toward CNN remains a wild card.”

Other news outlets noted that the Trump administration is also contemplating demanding the ouster of current CNN boss Jeff Zucker in exchange for approving the deal. The news was quick to result in letters to the DOJ from several Senators who claimed Trump was “interfering” in an approval process that should be left up to regulators and the DOJ to decide:

“Any political interference in antitrust enforcement is unacceptable,” Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar wrote in a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “Even more concerning, in this instance, is that it appears that some advisers to the President may believe that it is appropriate for the government to use its law enforcement authority to alter or censor the press. Such an action would violate the First Amendment.”

If you’re at all familiar with the ethical behavior over at AT&T (like the times it ripped off a program for the hearing impaired or made bills harder to understand to help criminals scam its own customers), it would certainly be in character for AT&T to agree to trample the editorial firewall between itself and CNN to get the deal done — it just wouldn’t be stupid enough to put any such agreement in writing. As the net neutrality fight makes clear, telecom giants aren’t particularly concerned about the whole free speech thing (check out Verizon’s first foray into tech content, for example).

AT&T’s also a world-class expert at making utterly bogus claims when it comes to its latest megamergers, consistently claiming such deals will lower prices, expand broadband coverage and create oceans of new jobs (telecom megamerger history makes it abundantly clear the exact opposite almost always occurs). Given some similar expertise over at the Trump camp, there’s an incredible opportunity for some amazing bullshit here; an opportunity Trump likely won’t want to waste by continuing what’s become an arguably unhealthy fixation on CNN.

The likely outcome is that we’ll get to have our rotten cake and eat it too: a torrent of bogus job and broadband expansion promises the likes of which we’ve never seen before — and a CNN left bridled by a meddling new corporate parent focused exclusively on currying favor in the Trump administration to anti-competitive benefit. Just think of the incredible potential for synergies…and bullshit.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: at&t, cnn, time warner

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As 'Leverage' Over CNN”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
JoeCool (profile) says:


The likely outcome is that we’ll get to have our rotten cake and eat it too

You pushed my button. I’ll cut-n-paste in the comment I have pre-prepared for when people do this.

Nice article, but…
You used the one phrase that pushes my buttons: "You want to have your cake and eat it, too!"

Well duh! What good is having cake and not being able to eat it?!?! What kind of sick bastard hands you cake and then tells you "You can have this cake, but eating it is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN!" The whole point of having cake is to eat it.

No, the PROPER way to say what is INTENDED is "You want to eat your cake and have it, too!" That makes a LOT more sense. Once you’ve eaten the cake, it’s gone and no amount of crying will allow you to have it afterwards.

People have this saying backwards, and I won’t rest until people use it in the correct fashion! Given this rant, I feel this is mandatory:

Anonymous Coward says:

This i what is great about Trump

“Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As ‘Leverage’ Over CNN”

The pure and unbridled objective of ALL politics. When your politicians says they are not like this and then says… let’s regulate….

ha ha haaaaaaa…. most politicians are just little trumps with weaker spines!

This is why regulation leads to capture, and why politicians like it, and why politicians don’t enforce laws so you will give them more power with more laws with which they will use to control the market more.

The businesses have already figured it out, just pay the politicians and you get your way, like a racket. Pay for that protection baby! I bet you would hate to see your precious Internets destroyed right? Now give us more power to regulate, BEG FOR IT!


Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: This i what is great about Trump

ha ha… when I talk about the nature of politics and big business you claim that I am asking for anarchy.

Give it a rest Mr. Stawman please!

The Founding Fathers “THEMSELVES” made the same general statements and yet they still setup a government and regulated a few things. O wait… I keep forgetting you guys don’t know who they are. My bad!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

And if there isn’t any conflict happening, then by golly conflict will be created. Because if you can create the conflict, you can also remove it & show what a wonderful leader you are solving the problems that never really existed in the first place.
It works elsewhere in the world for other leaders so I see no reason why it won’t work in the USA.

Anonymous Coward says:

Worth noting...

…is that attempting to block the merger is just a normal policy decision.

However, threatening to block the merger in an attempt to curtail CNN’s First Amendment rights is an abuse of the power of the office, and as such is quite clearly an impeachable offense.

Not that impeachment will happen: Trump could kill, cook, and eat a baby on the White House lawn and the spineless Republican members of Congress would furrow their brows and go on cable news to “express concern”, then ignore it entirely in order to put party ahead of country.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...