Google Hating Mississippi Attorney General Sues Company… With Ammo From EFF

from the well,-this-could-get-interesting dept

We’ve written a fair amount about Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood over the years, with a major focus on his factually-challenged hatred of Google, that may or may not be influenced by Hood’s heavy funding from Hollywood. What is known, however, is that the MPAA, quite clearly, decided to use Hood as a pawn in its campaign to attack Google. The Sony Pictures hack from a few years back revealed a detailed plan, put together by the MPAA, to funnel money and resources to Hood solely for the purpose of attacking Google with questionable legal claims. Hood’s first attempt to do so (with letters that were literally written by the MPAA’s lawyers) effectively failed, following a legal challenge from Google.

Hood, of course, is not one to give up, so he’s back again with a lawsuit filed against Google, arguing that the company has violated student privacy with its Google Apps for Education. If this sounds vaguely familiar, here’s the twist: this is the same basic complaint that the EFF complained about in a filing to the FTC a year and a half ago. The EFF, of course, actively fought Jim Hood in his initial attack on Google, so it’s a neat trick by Hood (and, perhaps, the MPAA?) to now use the EFF’s own legal arguments against Google.

As I stated back when the EFF filed its complaint, even though we frequently agree with the EFF on things (and even though we wish Google was better on privacy), I’m still struggling to see what the privacy violation is here. The key issue is that Google signed a pledge — the Student Privacy Pledge — which says that when offering its apps to schools, it will safeguard student’s privacy in some very clear ways. Multiple third parties, including the Future of Privacy Forum — who helped create the very pledge Google is accused of violating — has looked at Google’s G Suite for Education and concluded that it complies with the pledge. There are no ads in the G Suite for Education, which is the main privacy issue. But the EFF’s complaint was that by sync’ing student accounts, it’s storing information about the students in violation of the pledge. But the sync feature is just to allow students to be able to log in from multiple devices and have the same experience — and Google insists that none of that information is ever used for advertising or other datamining. If it turns out that’s not true, then there are issues. But if Google is being accurate here, I’m just don’t see where the problem is.

As far as I can tell, the FTC has done nothing with the EFF’s complaint. But now it appears that (without naming EFF), Jim Hood has decided to jump in to the legal waters and claim that Google is violating its pledge on student data privacy.

It feels like someone in Hood’s office (again, perhaps with some nudging from friends at the MPAA) decided that it would be a neat trick to use the EFF’s own complaint against Google to go after Google yet again. It most likely will mean that EFF won’t oppose Jim Hood as it did last time around. However, taking a step back and looking at the actual complaint, it’s difficult to see how it will stick. As stated above, the organizations that created the very pledge in the first place have claimed that EFF is wrong (and are now saying that Hood is wrong), and that Google complies with the pledge itself. This also seems like a weird issue for Hood to focus on for any other reason than because he wants to attack Google. In fact, it’s questionable how this is anything but an Attorney General using his position for something of a personal vendetta against a company he dislikes.

It will be interesting to see how Google responds to this lawsuit… and how far it can actually go.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: eff, google

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Google Hating Mississippi Attorney General Sues Company… With Ammo From EFF”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Jim Hood Special Investigation Unit

This would be an awesome show. Right up until the end of the first season when it turns that Mr Hood, has so many moral imperfections, he is a sponge and that the Media companies are using it against him. I would honestly just start using my government sources to get all of the data on him and make him leave office. There is no way someone that inept could get into office on their own. They have skeletons in their closet and are just being the puppet of someone with the strings to pull.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

That’s not actually the case. It’s also about collection and use of data for non-educational purposes. In particular, the pledge says Google will:

“Not collect, maintain, use or share student personal information beyond that needed for authorized educational/school purposes, or as authorized by the parent/student.”

Do you really think Google is siloing the sync data for students away, and not including it in their general data analytics about how to improve Chrome or other non-educational Google products?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Does he have a boss?

or those pesky citizens decide to stop voting for turds…. good luck!

Meanwhile it will be just like you said. Until Google tries to install or fund their own patsy to work for them in government.

Question, did you state that because you are okay with businesses funding their own government patsies or because you are so used to the corruption that you provided a corruption based solution to a problem caused by apathetic citizens?

jilocasin (profile) says:

Google stopped....

If you look at the EFF page ( ) discussing things, it looks like Google was tracking students via their student [Google Apps for Education] accounts and then using that data to build a profile used to market to them when the were using any other Google service outside of a very limited number that Google claimed were covered by their pledge.

Google initially argued that technically they were abiding by their privacy agreement, they didn’t show ads within the Google Apps for Education apps.

Apparently in response to the EFF complaint they have stopped collecting data on student accounts. So while Mr. Hood may be able to complain about the past, it isn’t ongoing. Other than some sort of monetary fine, there isn’t anything for the courts to do.

PrivacyLover says:

Motivation seems horrible but what's wrong verifying Google claims?

We have technology in our homes that spy on everyone including our children. Legal framework to enforce privacy is non-existent. Verifying Google’s voluntary privacy claims doesn’t seem like such a bad idea. In this case the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Anonymous Coward says:

mike can you provide a source for the statement "Google insists that none of that information is ever used for advertising or other datamining"?

their privacy policies say they don’t target advertising, but i cant find anything that says they dont collect data and use it for untargeted advertising by feeding it into their general datamining or advertising analytics systems

sounds to me like theyre still collecting data, and they just turned off targeted advertising (the same way any person can disable targeted advertising, but not data collection)

Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

This is nothing but Hood going for retribution as a way to get back at Google for the embarrassment he suffered from the MPAA/Hood fiasco and using the EFF’s complaint to do that.

Hood doesn’t even attempt to change much in the complaint other then add in his own two cents to make it applicable to Mississippi, and In my opinion very thinly at that.

Everyone knows that Hood being exposed as an MPAA puppet via info from the Sony Pictures hack made him look like a clown with the big floppy shoes and red nose and Google held Hood’s feet to the fire and pursued it in court and you know Hood took a beating over that politically and in the media and I am sure his ego was more than a little hurt at being exposed.

The MPAA didn’t like that they got caught with their pants down in this fiasco either not did the law firm that drafted the Hood complaint used against Google in the first go round, a lot of people took a ego thumping that day and were exposed as shills of the MPAA but no one more than Hood.

Hood hasnt exactly been able to get back at Google for dragging him thru the mud, but this is just one step to try and get a little payback.

The irony here is that Hood is using the EFF’s own complaint to once again go after Google just shows you that much like the first time Hood used the MPAA drafted complaint, that using someone else’s work to get the dirty deed is right up Hood’s alley and there doesn’t seem to be one original thought to come out of Hoods head.

Makes me wonder how the hell did Hood get elected to office as the Mississippi AG when he cant seem to come up with anything on his own.

orbitalinsertion (profile) says:

So… devoid of any actual evidentiary claims or discovery requests. Good filing. I guess you can do that.

Does he know that ads can be targeted to the content of the page being viewed, and have crap-all to do with a profile? Is the State of Mississippi aware of ad and script blockers? Is Hood aware that one can opt out of targeted ads and tracking with any Google account?

I am not under any illusions about being tracked and harvested by Google or anyone else, and I am not going to be the first person in line to nominate teh Goog for sainthood. But i think providing the apps, just as MS provides free software education programs and discounted student editions of software, is plenty enough market capture and they don’t need to collect data or target ads here.

And yes we could all do with better privacy policies and TOS across the board. So why don’t you do something about that, asshole. (Because that isn’t really the problem, is it?)

Ninja (profile) says:

Re: Re:

According to Ars ( he seems to have conducted tests that suggested something was being collected even if ads were not shown in the app suite. Whether it holds in court or not is to be seen but as Mike said there was auditing before and the ones that made the pledge told Google was ok. Stay tuned!

Anonymous Coward says:

Depends on what Hood wants to accomplish

In a knife fight, the object isn’t to cut out your opponents heart. While that might be the winning move, rarely can it be accomplished.

No, the object is to bleed your opponent out. Sometimes with major wounds, but mostly with many lesser wounds.

Hood and his cronies at the MPAA and RIAA are simply switching tactics from trying to gut Google, to simply bleeding them out. With a side dish of defamation and loudly crying “THIEF!”.

There ought to be a kick starter campaign to fund Hood’s political opponent. If they want Citizens United to stand, let’s give it to them.

Anonymous Coward says:

This also seems like a weird issue for Hood to focus on for any other reason than because he wants to attack Google.

You have to remember that Hood is taking barking orders from the MPAA, who has a history of claiming that piracy is responsible for everything from terrorism to child pornography to toothache.

Frankly, God bless the Sony leaks for forcing the MPAA and Hood to tip their hand.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...