MPAA Applauds Derailment of FCC Cable Box Competition Plan Because, Uh, Jobs!

from the overlords-of-nonsense dept

Last week we noted how the FCC had to scrap its plan to bring competition to the cable box after an unprecedented PR and disinformation campaign by the cable and entertainment industries. In short, using consultants, think tanks, payrolled politicians, a soundwall of misleading editorials and even the US Copyright Office, the cable industry was able to convince many in the press, public and even at the FCC that the plan would have ripped the planet off its very orbital access, violated copyright, eroded consumer privacy, and even harmed diversity programming.

In reality, the cable sector’s opposition was about two things: $21 billion in captive box rental revenues, and a fear of a loss of control. Being an expert in the latter, the MPAA of course was quick to issue a statement applauding the “delay” in the FCC’s proceeding:

“The MPAA is pleased that the FCC is taking more time, and we hope they use it to ensure any set-top box proposal remains consistent with copyright policy and avoids harming creators,? said MPAA Chairman and CEO Senator Chris Dodd, who emphasized that his organization, along with ?virtually the entire creative community? is ?standing up for copyright and the rights of creators.”

Except again, the cable box plan has nothing to do with copyright. The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to third party hardware vendors, resulting in more competition in cable boxes and ultimately more open and cheaper boxes. Because that might just give consumers a little more control, the MPAA joined the hissy fit parade of inaccurate implausibilities. And to justify trying to keep the cable box locked down and shitty, the best the MPAA can apparently do is reiterate some nonsensical talking points about jobs:

“We support the FCC?s goal of promoting set-top box competition, but we continue to urge the Commission to forge a path that does not undermine the creative economy,? Dodd continued. ?Copyright employs more than 5.5 million U.S. workers and generates over $1 trillion in economic value ? incentivizing innovation and investment in creative works enjoyed by millions around the world.”

Except the FCC’s proposal wouldn’t hurt jobs in the slightest. Under the FCC’s plan, customers still would pay for cable, they’d just have more flexibility in how that programming is consumed. And if anything, you’d see more jobs as the cable hardware itself was opened to multiple hardware competitors and streaming vendors looking to make headway in the space. But just like their previous whining session on this subject, the MPAA can’t just admit it’s terrified of evolution and consumer empowerment, so it apparently has to conflate “copyright” with a loss of control.

Meanwhile, while many media outlets continue to insist this plan is simply on hold, there’s really only two likely outcomes moving forward thanks to cable lobbyists, the US Copyright Office, and folks like the MPAA: either the plan gets scrapped entirely, or the end result winds up being so watered down as to be utterly useless.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: mpaa

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “MPAA Applauds Derailment of FCC Cable Box Competition Plan Because, Uh, Jobs!”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

5.5 million jobs? Where? When? I vaguely remember someone saying such nonsense but when asked didn’t they enlist completely unrelated jobs as part of they’re employed?
I’m surprise they think a significant amount of the population will believe such thing, then again as they obviously own most news channels they might be able to pull another succesful misinformation campaign

WDS (profile) says:

Missing Words???

“The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to third party hardware vendors”

I think some works were left out. Should it not say, “The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to boxes made by third party hardware vendors”.

If they were required to pass it to the vendors, they would have a legitimate argument. Passing it to their customer via a box made by a third party, their argument is without foundation.

Wendy Cockcroft (profile) says:

The Market Will Self-Correct, Right?

I’ve been waiting to hear back from the free market enthusiasts, who expect us to all to resort to their favoured tactic, voluntary withholding of continued support for these services, but the silence is deafening.

Can it be that, while we’re locked into contracts that run for up to 18 months AND there’s only one service provider due to regulatory capture, the market is too damn restricted to be able to self-correct?

If this isn’t tyranny, what is it?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...