New Zealand's Raid On Investigatory Journalist Was Illegal

from the all-these-raids dept

Back in the fall of 2014, we wrote about a highly questionable police raid on the home of Nicky Hager, a well-known journalist who had published powerful pieces criticizing the government (and who was working on some investigations concerning the Snowden documents and New Zealand’s involvement in mass surveillance). The wonderful Freedom of the Press Foundation (who helped raise funds for Hager’s legal defense) has now alerted us to the fact that the raid on Hager’s home was deemed illegal by New Zealand’s High Court:

The judge found that the search was illegal. He said that the Police had failed to disclose relevant information to the Judge who issued the warrant. As a result, he formally declared that the warrant was ?fundamentally unlawful?. He also found that the search was therefore unlawful. Justice Clifford also expressed concerns about other aspects of the Police?s actions.

This reminds me of the raids on Kim Dotcom’s house as well, which involved a bogus warrant. Though, in that case, the High Court, after admitting that the warrants were not drafted properly, decided they were “good enough.” Either way, those are the only two law enforcement raids in New Zealand, and both came under sketchy circumstances, where the police couldn’t be bothered to actually follow the rules. What’s going on down there?

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “New Zealand's Raid On Investigatory Journalist Was Illegal”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

If those were the only two raids in 2014, we are probably looking at an area where the legal restraints haven’t been sufficiently defined.

But this is politics: If you act first and let the legal questions wait, you will violate innocents, while if you ask questions first, you will let guilty people go free. Politicians define instructions on how agressive the implementation should be.

By “assumption of innocence” you should be protected against these kinds of things. But politically the world has turned towards “safety first”, then “assumption of innocence”.

Or in strategy: Since “think of the children”, “tough on crime” and “fight terrorism” are so strong paroles, the politicians would rather take responsibility for too aggressive enforcement than giving political opponents ammunition for using them!

In the end this question is also a symptom of mainstream media being biased – understandably so – towards bigger headlines and less towards a more balanced coverage. An example is the coverage of a crime: It starts with someone getting arrested, which is heavily covered in the press, then a long time of only huge court cases making media stories as they happen and ultimately the ruling is covered generally. All mitigating factors are removed and since many do not differ betweeen being arrested and being sentenced, most cases will look like either an evil getting punished or an evil escaping justice. Mainstream journalism today are horrible at covering crime reporting in a balanced way or with deep and diverse enough angles. Same generally goes for geopolitical coverage where it often gets into “us versus them” instead of more analysis of what is dividing them and what the sides are generally acting against/for.

Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

They did. That period of time went down in history under the name “the Reign of Terror.” It’s worth noting that this name didn’t come about as an accusation of a political opponent of the reigning terrorists, nor was it coined by a later historian looking back upon those days with a critical eye. No, it was actually explicitly (and enthusiastically) described as such by Maximilien Robespierre, the guy in charge of all the terror and reigning.

I really hope no one today is seriously looking to those times as inspiration.

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I really hope no one today is seriously looking to those times as inspiration.

I propose a pilot project. Once we’ve seen a few from Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bros., and the Fed go through the process, we can evaluate the result. Until then, I’ll just sit here waiting, wishing I had some cake.

I am not going to soon forget what those bastards pulled. I do want to see heads roll.

Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

Here’s my plan for what I will do with Wall Street when I am president:

Break up huge financial institutions in the first year of my administration. Within the first 100 days of my administration, I will require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a “Too Big to Fail” list of commercial banks, shadow banks, and insurance companies whose failure would pose a catastrophic risk to the U.S. economy without a taxpayer bailout. Within one year, my administration will break these institutions up so that they no longer pose a grave threat to the economy.

End too-big-to-jail. We live in a country today that has an economy that is rigged, a campaign finance system which is corrupt, and a criminal justice system which often does not dispense justice. The average American sees kids being arrested and sometimes even jailed for possessing marijuana. But when it comes to Wall Street executives — some of the most wealthy and powerful people in this country whose illegal behavior hurt millions of Americans — somehow nothing happens to them. No jail time. No police record. No justice.

Not one major Wall Street executive has been prosecuted for causing the near collapse of our entire economy. That will change under my administration. “Equal Justice Under Law” will not just be words engraved on the entrance of the Supreme Court. It will be the standard that applies to Wall Street and all Americans.

— Bernie Sanders

At the very least, it sounds like a better plan than sharpening up the ol’ French National Razors.

GEMont (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

Slight technical alteration to improve reality…

Here’s my plan for what I will do with Wall Street when I am president:

Break up huge financial institutions in the first year of my administration.

Breaking news:

President Mason Wheeler was killed today; only days after his State of the Nation address announcement that he would be fielding legislation to break up all the huge US financial institutions, when his bulletproof limousine was crushed by Boeing 747 flight 215 out of Kansas, that literally dropped out of the sky directly on top of the president’s car as he and his entourage waited for a street light on 35th avenue, in Boston. There were no survivors.


Personanongrata says:


What’s going on down there?

The New Zealand government as a junior member of the Five Eyes global surveillance program overseen/funded by the US and British governments must genuflect upon command or lose the “privilege” of participating in the program.

From Wikipedia:

Five Eyes

In the late 1990s, the existence of ECHELON was disclosed to the public, triggering a major debate in the European Parliament and, to a lesser extent, the United States Congress. As part of efforts in the ongoing War on Terror since 2001, the FVEY further expanded their surveillance capabilities, with much emphasis placed on monitoring the World Wide Web. The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden described the Five Eyes as a “supra-national intelligence organisation that doesn’t answer to the known laws of its own countries”.[6] Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY have been spying on one another’s citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on surveillance of citizens.[7][8][9][10]

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...