Harvard Law Launches Project To Put Every Court Decision Online For Free

from the nicely-done dept

On Thursday, Harvard Law School announced its Free the Law project, teaming up with a company called Ravel to scan all federal court decisions and all state court decisions, and then place them all online for free. This is pretty huge. While some courts now release most decisions as freely available PDFs, many federal courts still have them hidden behind the ridiculous PACER system, and state court decisions are totally hit or miss. And, of course, tons of historical cases are completely buried. While there are some giant companies like Westlaw and LexisNexis that provide lawyers access to decisions, those cost a ton — and the public is left out. This new project is designed to give much more widespread access to the public. And it sounds like they’re really going above and beyond to make it truly accessible, rather than just dumping PDFs online:

The cases will be accessible in a searchable format and, along with the texts, they will be presented with visual maps developed by the company, which graphically show the evolution through cases of a judicial concept and how each key decision is cited in others.

Ravel is a private company, which is paying for the scanning, but Harvard appears to have structured things in a pretty reasonable manner. Harvard “owns” the resulting data (assuming what’s ownable), and while there are some initial restrictions that Ravel can put on the corpus of data, that goes away entirely after eight years, and can end earlier if Ravel “does not meet its obligations.” Beyond that, Harvard is making everything available to non-profits and researchers anyway. Ravel is apparently looking to make some money by providing advanced tools for sifting through the database, even if the content itself will be freely available.

All in all, this looks like a useful and worthwhile project — one that the federal and state governments should have already done on their own, but… Now if we can just open up PACER finally….

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: harvard, ravel

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Harvard Law Launches Project To Put Every Court Decision Online For Free”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

“one that the federal and state governments should have already done on their own, but… “

Governments almost never do anything on their own unless money is being shoveled at them. This Pacer bypass is great news, but there is still much work to be done. It seems that the vast majority of public records are still not accessible online, a full two decades after the WorldWide Web opened the information superhighway that was supposed to make driving a car obsolete.

Of course, special interests like private developers will always prefer that the public not discover the plans and schemes they’re cooking up with the city and county governments.

DannyB (profile) says:

But what about Copyright?

First, if the court decisions are not under copyright, then they should be. Otherwise, what incentive would judges have to make decisions?

Second, putting these decisions online for free makes it difficult for other bottom feeders to monetize access to those decisions by erecting troll gates.

If judges don’t receive income from the parties that benefit from their decisions, then what incentive will judges have to make more decisions favorable to particular parties if there is nothing in it for them?

alternatives() says:

Re: And I would have gotten away with it ...

It will be much easier to see patterns of judicial misconduct.

Having a functioning system to make sure courts are honest is needed. If the lawyers would be on the dime for misconduct they’d have a reason to be less enamoured with Judges jerking ppl around.

But where is the tutorial sites on how to run a PAC to oppose and publicise the crappy Judges? Where is the push to have ALL court matters recorded like we want to record all cops?

Adam40 (profile) says:

Won't replace Pacer

Pacer is a fee based service to access state and federal court dockets. It includes rulings for which opinions may be unwarranted, as well as motion practice. Westlaw and Lexis do not offer the same access to the pleadings and orders of a lawsuit as Pacer. I don’t see Pacer going away because of the launch of Ravel because the granularity simply won’t be there if you need that. And lawyers need that to do their job.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...