Turing Pharma Caves; Says Drug Price Will Move In Generally Downward Motion At Some Point In The Future

from the and-will-only-do-so-because-the-public-doesn't-understand-business dept

Martin Shkreli — who became the personification of a deeply-reviled industry thanks to his insanely-exorbitant price hike on a 60-year old drug — has heard the disapproving roar of the crowd and will do… something… at some point in the future… to make things right. Or at least a bit more right-ish.

In an interview with ABC, Shkreli announced Daraprim’s $750/pill price will be rolled back to something less extortionate.

“We’ve agreed to lower the price on Daraprim to a point that is more affordable and is able to allow the company to make a profit, but a very small profit,” he told ABC News. “We think these changes will be welcomed.”

With nothing else to go on (other than Shkreli’s continued assertions that the drug is still underpriced), the public will just have to assume that the new price point, whenever it arrives, will be barely above cost. (Considering it was produced for a $1/pill before Turing’s purchase, one would think a significant reduction in price would still leave plenty of room for profits and additional R&D.)

Turing’s mini-debacle has damaged the pharmaceutical industry. It has drawn even more heat from legislators and presidential candidates. It has even negatively affected more tangible aspects, like stock prices. Shkreli’s actions have also drawn attention to the oft-ignored regulatory procedures that allow companies to fully exploit old drugs and medications, even without the protective power of active patents. Derek Lowe at Science Magazine explains the route to securing post-patent monopolies.

By various means, old generic compounds have ended up as protected species, and several companies have made it their business to take advantage of these situations to the maximum extent possible. The FDA grants market exclusivity to companies that are willing to take “grandfathered” compounds into compliance with their current regulatory framework, and that’s led to some ridiculous situations with drugs like colchicine and progesterone. (Perhaps the worst example is a company that’s using this technique to get ahold of a drug that’s currently being provided at no charge whatsoever).

Combine this with the bottleneck Turing generously refers to as “distribution” (via a single specialty pharmacy or directly from Turing itself) and you have everything you need to demand any amount you want for a lifesaving drug with a limited market. Everything being said about R&D investment is just smoke until proven otherwise.

Following his short statements promising unquantified price drops at an unspecified point in the future, Martin Shkreli — who seemed to relish praising himself/insulting his detractors from this social media platform — took his Twitter ball and went home.


Turns out the market will bear far less than Turing thought, even with the benefits of a tightly-controlled distribution chain and the FDA’s assistance in keeping competitors off the playing field. A whole lot of people who will never use the drug managed to nudge the price downward, and all within 48 hours.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: turing, turing pharmaceutical

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Turing Pharma Caves; Says Drug Price Will Move In Generally Downward Motion At Some Point In The Future”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
41 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Serious question, apart from running the production line and distribution (ok, ok and lobbying budget) exactly WTF is that money being spent on.

It’s not like they have monthly Health & Safety reviews / FDA checkups.

Also I’m pretty sure if their situation is so precarious
they can’t afford to pay out dividends so no yachts here.

Maybe Mr. Shkreli spends the money on gear for his LoL Team… LOL IDK !?

Anonymous Coward says:

Lies

First it was “you all don’t understand how it works and it will cost less” then it was “but research!” and after people pointed out that the drug is 50+ years old and questioned where all this research money went, now he wants to reduce the price to $2 ($1 production + $.50 distribution. leaves $.50 aka a small profit) in the future. The future is anything from now until the end of the universe so I guess don’t hold your breath.

Mysterious voice across the universe: “The Universe will end in 3,” “Price of Daraprim is 1 cent now” “,1…”

Sorry but all I’m hearing is “Pay or die!” But a thumbs up for capitalism. The guy understands it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Lies

Pure capitalism would only have one barrier to entry into a market, the ability to raise the capital needed. When laws and regulations are used to protect the incumbents in any industry, the system has become protectionist, and is well on its way to becoming a feudal like system, where an elite own and control all resources.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Lies

Which any good capitalist would take advantage of. People have to remember that in general corporations are amoral constructs with the purpose of making as much money as is possible.

Blaming them for acting like money-grubbing dirtbags is like blaming the scorpion when it stings. To them it’s not a matter of right or wrong, it’s about performing a natural function.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Lies

The very antithesis of capitalism is protectionism. This is the very thing that Adam Smith argued against when advocating free market capitalism. Should governments grant exclusivity? Should they limit competition? The answer is no.

Yet this is exactly what we have today with excessive IP and other laws that attempt to give those willing to buy regulators, through back door dealings, exclusivity. We have a very very corrupt FDA. If it were up to them just about all dietary supplements would be banned by now or greatly monopolized thanks to the FDA. Even herbs. But the dietary supplement health and education act limited the FDA’s ability to regulate dietary supplements and added a grandfathered date that all herbs and dietary supplements before that date can’t be banned by the FDA. Even then the FDA has managed to regulate naturally occurring supplements like red yeast rice in ways that limit their medicinal effectiveness by limiting the amount of naturally occurring effective ingredients that they contain to trace amounts. Despite the fact that these alternatives have been shown to be safe unregulated (and have been around for hundreds of years), especially relative to pharmaceuticals. and why do they do this? So they can push prices of pharmaceuticals up by restricting competition. The FDA is a corrupt corrupt organization that has absolutely no right to take away my health freedoms. They have no right!!!! It’s none of their business. If I want to try an unadulterated herb, with whatever naturally occurring ingredients it has, for whatever health problem I may have the FDA needs to mind its own business instead of telling me that they don’t want to give me the opportunity to try and see if it works for me. It’s my decision. Their medical authority be darned because they don’t have my best interest in mind, only their own. and if I want to sell that herb on a free market they should also get out of the way so long as the contents of whatever it is that’s being sold matches the label so that the buyer knows what they are buying. Otherwise when the FDA tries to limit the number of sellers of something they are effectively making something more expensive for me as a buyer and they really have no business doing that.

but this entire country has turned into nothing but a protectionist country. From excessive IP to taxi-cab medallion laws to cableco monopolies to even attempts by the FDA to limit the generic market very little about this country is capitalistic anymore. It’s all exactly what Adam Smith warned against.

Ninja (profile) says:

He already got what he wanted (if the conspiracy theories are right) so it doesn’t matter anymore, right?

Besides, I’ve been seeing it in food prices: throw the price through the roof, let outrage ensue, scale prices back to slightly more than normal. People rejoice prices are back down but don’t realize it is significantly higher than before the massive hike.

John85851 (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I was just about to say this.

The same thing happens to gas prices:
Starting price: $2.00 a gallon.
Then prices go to up to $2.50 because of “reasons”.
People complain.
Then the gas companies “bow to public pressure” and reduce the price to $2.25.
People rejoice because they “won” because they got the big gas company to lower the price.

Yet the price is still higher than it was before this started. Sure, it’s not as high, but the company is still making more money.

Capt ICE Enforcer says:

Justice system

Wish we could press criminal charges against companies and CEO who do this. After all, instead of extortion it seems to me that murder would be more appropriate. Think of the choice these companies give. 1) Pay us a ton of money and lose your house, put your kids in the street lose any hopes of retirement and struggle for the rest of your life. 2) Die!
Yup criminal charges

John85851 (profile) says:

Price it out of the market

Or alternatively, this guy could be even more of a jerk and find a price point that’s still high for patients, but too low to make it un-profitable for other drug companies to make a competing drug.
And even then, how long will it take for a competitor to make their own drug- 2 or 3 years or longer? In the meantime, the guy enjoys the monopoly the previous company created by selling the drug for such a low price.

Anonymous Coward says:

would this have been gotten away with if it were over a product that those that make these ridiculous laws or do you think there would have been something else happen?
i dont blame the guy for trying to make money, but not like this. i also think that the fucking plums that continuously make laws that basically just screw ordinary people to the wall should be brought to account! they sure as hell wouldn’t be so keen to do this sort of thing if it affected them!!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...