FBI Successfully Stonewalls Inspector General Into Irrelevance By Withholding Timely Section 215 Documents

from the you-can't-oversee-what-you-can't-actually-see dept

The FBI doesn’t just stonewall FOIA requesters. It also stonewalls its in-house investigator. Remember all those deferrals to “lawful authority” and “rigorous oversight” the agency makes when not commenting on controversial surveillance programs? Those really don’t mean anything if you lock out the oversight and prevent his office from verifying whether surveillance is being carried out in accordance to laws and FBI policies.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz has been fighting a courageous, but losing, battle against FBI secrecy. As the head of the DOJ’s OIG office, you’d think FBI officials would throw a small amount of deference his way. But no. They don’t. It has obstructed his investigative work “for years,” leading to this sort of thing:

[Horowitz] said the refusal to grant routine requests stalls investigations, including a recent one on FBI material witnesses, such that officials who are under review have sometimes retired or left the agencies before the report is complete.

The FBI won’t even release an organizational chart to him. Horowitz took these complaints to Congress earlier this year in hopes of prompting FBI document production by threatening its annual budget.

Section 218 of the Appropriations Act does not permit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Justice to deny the OIG access to records in the custody of the Department unless in accordance with an express limitation of Section 6(a) of the IG Act. The IG Act, Section 6(a), does not expressly or otherwise limit the OIG’s access to the categories of information the FBI maintains it must review before providing records to the OIG. For this reason, we are reporting this matter to the Appropriations Committees in conformity with Section 218.

This, surprisingly, failed to have any effect — not because the FBI might have deduced Horowitz was actually serious about obtaining the long-delayed documents, but because if there’s anything government agencies fear more than a loss of power, it’s a loss of funding.

Marcy Wheeler points out that — during the ruckus surrounding the expiration of Section 215 — the FBI again passed several of its self-imposed deadlines for document delivery.

The OIG has sent four letters to Congress to report that the FBI has failed to comply with Section 218 by refusing to provide the OIG, for reasons unrelated to any express limitation in Section 6(a) of the IG Act, with timely access to certain records in ongoing OIG reviews. Those reviews are:

  • Two FBI whistleblower retaliation investigations, letter dated February 3, 2015, which is available here;
  • The FBI documents related to review of the DEA’s use of administrative subpoenas, letter dated February 19, 2015, which is available here;
  • The FBI’s use of information derived from collection of telephony metadata under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, letter dated February 25, 2015, which is available here; and
  • The FBI’s security clearance adjudication process, letter dated March 4, 2015, which is available here.

As of March 31, 2015, the OIG document requests were outstanding in every one of the reviews and investigations that were the subject of the letters above.

Of particular importance is the delay of documents related to the FBI’s use of Section 215 collections. Obviously, having the chance to review this before the vote on reauthorization would have been preferable. If there were any questions about the FBI’s involvement, or its use of the collected data, these observations could have potentially played a key role in the provision’s renewal, not to mention contributed to the debate surrounding the USA Freedom Act.

Obviously, the FBI preferred to keep legislators in the dark about its participation in Section 215. An ill-informed legislature is more prone to rely on fear-mongering and other baseless assertions. With nothing stating otherwise, the FBI is free to operate under the illusion that its use of the program is by-the-book and that the program itself is effective and useful.

Horowitz is one of the few government officials willing to stand up to the FBI. Unfortunately, it hasn’t resulted in better behavior by the agency. Apparently, the FBI feels it does best with minimal oversight and isn’t inclined to let anyone — not even its in-house inspector — in on its domestic surveillance tactics.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FBI Successfully Stonewalls Inspector General Into Irrelevance By Withholding Timely Section 215 Documents”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Anonymous Coward says:

OIG without Power

What is the point of an Office of Inspector General without power? Seems like it is both a waste of time and money as well as being one of those ‘feel good’ solutions Congress likes to come up with. Either give him the powers of say a special prosecutor (or something) or spend the money on something that will work.

Oversight should not be a placebo to the people, it should work in the spirit of checks and balances. Oversight is the check and should have sufficient power to balance.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: OIG without Power


noun: oversight; plural noun: oversights

an unintentional failure to notice or do something.
“he said his failure to pay for the tickets was an oversight”
synonyms: mistake, error, omission, lapse, slip, blunder;

Anonymous Coward says:

Nothing to Fear

“This, surprisingly, failed to have any effect — not because the FBI might have deduced Horowitz was actually serious about obtaining the long-delayed documents, but because if there’s anything government agencies fear more than a loss of power, it’s a loss of funding.”

That’s because they know it isn’t going to happen.

Anonymous Coward says:

In the fance of stonewalling

The IG must presume that absence of evidence of compliance is evidence of absence of compliance, and issue appropriately scathing reports. “We were unable to confirm that the FBI obeyed the law in the conduct of its investigations, or that it even attempted to do so. We can only presume this office is operating outside the law, and recommend that it be shuttered.”

Gary Mont (profile) says:

The Right To Bear Arms is now The Right To Bear Butt and Bend Over

One has to wonder exactly what it is going to take to finally convince the American Public that the federal government and its agencies no longer work for the (non-billionaire) people of the United States.

The Federal Agencies and the USG itself have done absolutely everything short of shooting people in broad daylight, to shut out any kind of public exposure of their secretive and semi-legal activities for the last ten years and more and yet the American Public still acts amazed when they ask a pertinent question of these once-upon-a-time employees and the USG or its agents simply tell them to go fuck themselves.

Its really no wonder that the USG treats the American People with disdain and utter contempt.

It is also no wonder why the rest of the world’s population holds the American People in contempt and views American Society with disgust.

We The People have none to blame but themselves.

Pronounce (profile) says:

No Truer Words Have Been Written

“if there’s anything government agencies fear more than a loss of power, it’s a loss of funding.”

And there are very few morals exercised in acquiring both. Without oversight and the ability to act out of the public’s view U.S. government officials have no qualms about doing anything to acquire both.

Cthulhu is an appropriate euphemism for our government.

Anonymous Coward says:

If the IG is powerless then the FBI has gone rogue. That being said funding for that government agency should be curtailed immediately, the director of said agency should be subpenaed and held accountable for high treason. I imagine they FBI agents will just shoot the IG in the back and hope no one catches it on their phone.

Gary Mont (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Revolution is pointless.

It is the journey of a point on a wheel, returning to its origin.

Revolution simply trades one gang of criminals masquerading as statesmen for another gang of criminals masquerading as statesmen.

With Revolution, nothing actually changes except the names of the men and women using your lives as fodder for their own personal aggrandizement.

Evolution is necessary.

Compose governments of people earning less than 50,000 per annum, who are given a publically accessible expense account and an appropriate living space for the duration of their term, but are paid at the end of their term according to their accomplishments while in office, and you have the beginning of real change.

Of course this is impossible.

Politicians and their Corporate owners would never allow it and the population has no voice in the matter. 🙂

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...