DailyDirt: The Legal Definition Of What You're Eating…

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

There are some bizarre legal definitions for common foods. For example, we’ve seen that the definition of a sandwich was under dispute because a burrito place was encroaching on a sandwich shop in a shopping mall food court. That case decided that a burrito was not a sandwich, but food experts don’t all agree on that point. Here are a few other cases of defining some foods legally and not with your gut.

If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: hampton creek foods, unilever, usda

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: The Legal Definition Of What You're Eating…”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Fail. ‘A tortilla’ is still not ‘two slices of bread’. It is at best the equivalent of one slice of bread. And since it’s wrapped around the filling, it doesn’t qualify as an ‘open sandwich’ either, with IMHO is an oxymoron. Open sandwiches were the first step in diluting the definition of what a sandwich really is.

All this dumbing down of food so that even the most idiotic wanker can simply ask for a ‘sammich’ (god, kill those people, please!) without having to learn what they’re actually eating.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

What’s to be done about quesadillas, though? Most involve folding, but at least one variant requires two tortillas (which could be divided into open vs. crimped/sealed edges)… Damn, I can’t believe I gave away my Larousse Gastronomique.

“Sandwich” may be correct, but “sammiches” are fun and “sammidges” rock.

DB (profile) says:

The exact definition of a sandwich really does depend on the context.

In the context of a mall writing a lease that grants an exclusive sandwich market to a single business, a burrito arguably shouldn’t count as a sandwich. The lease clearly didn’t mean to exclude all other food places, or it would have been more broadly written. And a burrito, typically filled with rice and beans, and fully wrapped, isn’t all that close to a submarine sandwich or a burger. (A ‘wrap’ might result in a different decision, but that’s not at issue here.)

DB (profile) says:

That ‘fail’ points back to you. The statement didn’t address the question of a tortilla being bread. It’s key elements were “slices” and “between”. A tortilla is not sliced, and the content is wrapped within rather than captured between.

If the argument is going to be over exact definitions and phrasing, well, “technically correct is the best kind of correct”.

And don’t try to construct a definition that is so general such that you end up with an absurd result such as donuts, Oreos, fried chicken or tempura fitting the category.

Anonymous Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

That is a very narrow view of what a sandwich is. Think for instance about open faced sandwiches. Then there is the way sandwich got the name sandwich:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich

and the line of persons that honorarium related to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_of_Sandwich

But the most important view came from a ‘sandwich theory’ class I took a long time ago. Not only were the varieties of sandwich types, ingredients, containers (forms of bread), design and presentations discussed and experimented with, but commonalities amongst almost all of those. Two of those commonalities stood out.

First up, the spread goes on the bread. Whether you are using mayonnaise, butter, olive oil, or some other, this ingredient is intended to help the bread pass more smoothly (remember, bread was not always the very refined thing we view it as today in certain parts of the world) and is not intended normally as a flavor additive.

Second, the mustard goes on the meat. Whatever condiment one uses beyond the spread, is intended to flavor the filling. Cranberries on turkey, mustard on ham, or beef, or chicken, or turkey for that matter (in that sandwich, I would leave the cranberries out), or whatever your cuisine inspires.

This comment is aimed at the multitudes of inept sandwich makers in the commercial world, who once determining that you want mustard and mayonnaise on your sandwich proceed to slather one side of the bread with mayo, and the other with mustard, failing to consider the storied history and craft of professional sandwich making.

JEDIDIAH says:

...and another thing.

I don’t think Unilever has any problems. They have some “extra” bits. They have the necessary and sufficient elements of Mayo whereas that lying Vegan company does not. They even confuse the issue further by putting a big picture of the missing ingredient on the front of their package.

The typical liberal media narrative of “the underdog is the good guy” simply doesn’t work here.

Unilever is simply doing what the feds should have done already.

No foodie anywhere (including) Vegans should put up with this crap. It’s insulting.

“You are stupid ignorant gits and we can take advantage of you at will.”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: ...and another thing.

“The typical liberal media narrative of “the underdog is the good guy” simply doesn’t work here.”

Nice soap box you got there, what is this liberal media of which you speak?

Most uses of the terms liberal and conservative do so because the source does not regurgitate the desired extreme talking points.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...