President Obama Makes Vague Meaningless Statements About Net Neutrality, Patent Reform And Copyright Reform

from the anything-going-to-happen dept

President Obama was apparently in California on a campaign swing for the fall election (trying to help out some candidates and raise money) yesterday and chose to discuss the various issues that are important to folks around here… by giving generally vague and empty statements that might be important if they were actually backed up by anything.

On net neutrality:

Responding to a question from a woman who said her business is training people in ?mindfulness meditation? ? something the president joked that he needs ? Obama said his administration was going to make sure net neutrality remains untouched.

?It?s what has unleashed the power of the Internet, and we don?t want to lose that or clog up the pipes,? Obama said.

Sounds good, right? But will he actually do anything about it? He’s been saying the same basic thing for a while now, but the White House didn’t even submit comments to the FCC. Either way, we’ll believe it when we see it.

On patent reform:

The president also said his administration is committed to patent reform for the same reasons of encouraging growth.

He noted concerns about ?folks filing phony patents, and costing some of our best innovators tons of money in court, or even if they don?t go to court, having to pay them off just because they?re making a bogus claim.?

Right, but he still let the trial lawyers kill patent reform, which had already been massively watered down. With a little more support from the White House, perhaps Harry Reid would not have caved in to the demands from the trial lawyers.

And, then, on copyright law, he tossed out some red meat for folks in Hollywood:

Obama emphasized seeking intellectual property protections and fighting piracy overseas.

?Piracy ends up being a huge problem overseas, and that?s an area where we?ve stepped up enforcement,? he said.

Of course, this contradicts with his statements about patents getting in the way of growth. Same can be true of excessive copyright law, hindering various innovations that could drive growth. Supporting greater enforcement overseas is still based on exaggerated claims of “losses” from an industry that still doesn’t want to compete.

In the end, it’s no surprise that he didn’t have too much to say — he’s not going to break any major news in this manner — but it’s more just saying things to keep various groups happy, rather than actually doing something.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “President Obama Makes Vague Meaningless Statements About Net Neutrality, Patent Reform And Copyright Reform”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Good Speaker

He doesn’t really care anymore. He already got his via revolving door favors and whatnot. He’ll probably never be poor again.

The presidency has become a jackpot whereby you can offer various businesses favors in exchange for favors. Whoever does the best job conning the American people to vote for them wins. Whoever gets elected is the winner of the jackpot and they get to scam the American people in exchange for huge favors. What a nice game.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: overseas

It does enter as the DEA in Canada (coupled with RCMP Drug Task Force, which is a tiny organization that does not prevent Canadians from getting painkillers because X doctor has filled his quote of painkiller scripts per year or whatever the fuck stupidity the DEA enforces on professionals), there was 3 raids where the DEA was left entering Canada, at least news channels here were mostly against it, their political analysts all saying “it’s all well and good to stop drug dealing but this is stepping on our sovereignty”.

What’s ridiculous is that it wasn’t huge mafia or biker gangs busts (biker gangs are still quite a threat to public safety in Canada with their bunkers (with surveillance towers on 4 corners nonetheless) right in the middle of many cities. No it was internet chemical vendors who were selling to americans products banned in america that did it. Wanna hear of something scarily Orwellian? Trying to reach one of the sites after a DEA/RCMP raid on the last canadian vendor to get caught doing stupid things like selling to the US, their website redirected you to the DHS website. Chilling. I’d try it again to see if that’s still the case but even with my vpn service with about 120 servers, I won’t even risk it and be put on some kind of list.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

The President can declare a state of emergency, with martial law a part thereof until the emergency is over. So long as the Congress and/or the courts agree there is no problem.

If the Congress and/or the courts disagree with the state of emergency and any resulting martial law, then you’ll see a fight.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Martial law is actually a very interesting subject. On the federal level, there are almost no rules whatsoever about it and it has been taken up or discussed only a few times. At the state level, the rules are much more clear.

Probably the most authoritative statement about federal martial law came from a single supreme court case, where they said it is “the law of military necessity in the actual presence of war. It is administered by the general of the army, and is in fact his will. Of necessity it is arbitrary, but it must be obeyed.”

So, the best we can come to is that is requires the “actual presence of war”. Lawyers could redefine that, of course, but the intention seems clear: it could only happen if the US is actually invaded. An ISIS attack wouldn’t come close to that level.

If a president were to declare martial law in any other circumstance, it would cause a governmental fight on the order of a coup, with a good chance of leading to civil war.

In other words, it is extremely unlikely, as it would put the very base of of the president’s power in extreme peril.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Everytime Alex Jonians predictions of the kind are blabbered by some overly paranoid entity, you can be sure they will not happen.

The false flag is ISIS/ISIL itself, you don’t wanna know who they really consist of, you might be labelled a special kind of racist (and there’s only one kind of racism that’s really bad, of course). When an arab (syrian) guy defected the isis army,he confirmed that the worst most violent of them all are the French Muslism…and the Domneh. I’ll leave you people look up what the Domneh is, but it’s something many countries in the middle east is keeping down (it’s not a good thing to mention anything about this word, even saying the word could put one in trouble if heard by authorities).

Anonymous Coward says:

Obama can’t go work it out with congress. His idea of trying to make things work is give a speech. Missing in that is the actual getting in there and getting involved. Without that he can’t get anything political done that involves congress or money funding for programs he’d like to have happen.

Honestly, I don’t think he likes people nor politics very much. He doesn’t have the ability to really talk to people, rather than talk at them in speech form. Evidently he has a thin skin too because of the way the administration treats journalists as well as the White House News Corp.

The only thing he has left is the executive order, which he’s been trying to rule with rather than get laws passed supporting his goals.

Expect nothing to change from what it is now.

RD says:

Re: Re:

“The only thing he has left is the executive order, which he’s been trying to rule with rather than get laws passed supporting his goals. “

Oh yes? And how would that be, exactly? By issuing LESS EO’s than EVERY previous president back to FDR? Maybe you should actually google shit before you try to spread shit.

trollificus (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

The raw number of EOs is less important than what he is implementing via executive order.

And of course he is only resorting to using EOs because…you wanna do this like every other apologist in every other political thread on the entire Internet??

Never mind, we both know it’s “…because the obstructionist Republicans refuse to work in a bipartisan manner!”

I find the continued existence of Obama apologists to be as amazing as the continued existence of flat-earthers and breatheairians.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

The only thing he has left is the executive order, which he’s been trying to rule with rather than get laws passed supporting his goals.

You can’t blame him for that because since the 2010 midterms when repugs got control of the House, massively, they all literally said their policy is “saying no to everything Democrats or the President proposes”, which was caught on film if you haven’t seen that. “We’re the party of HELL NO.” – John McCain, a few weeks ago

Anonymous Coward says:

So basically campaign trail lip service. Can’t have the Republicans taking control of the House and Senate.

Obama has had plenty of time to address the public on these issues. This is the first time I’ve heard him speak about them.

I’m still waiting on that hope and change that was promised to me back in 2008.

Carrie says:

Copyright Law Doesn't Apply Overseas!

Obama Says: “Piracy ends up being a huge problem overseas, and that’s an area where we’ve stepped up enforcement.”

Courts Say: It is an “undisputed axiom that United States copyright law has no extraterritorial application.” Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co., 24 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 1994) (en banc)

Anyone notice a contradiction?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Copyright Law Doesn't Apply Overseas!

MegaUploaded leased server on American soil. Thus the DOJ claims jurisdiction through extradition. Everyone knows the lawsuit against MegaUpload is Joe Biden throwing a scrap of meat to the dogs in Hollywood because SOPA was defeated.

We even have Chris Dodd on record threatening to withhold campaign funding if he wasn’t given a return on his campaign investment.

staff (profile) says:

more dissembling by Masnick

‘“folks filing phony patents, and costing some of our best innovators tons of money in court, or even if they don’t go to court, having to pay them off just because they’re making a bogus claim.”’

Lies and damned lies. No one ever backs up those accusations and you dullards just perpetuate the lies.

Can you say ‘dissemble’? Just because they call it patent “reform” doesn’t mean it is.

Property rights and jobs in America are now hanging from a frayed thread. These changes are killing our small and startup firms and the jobs they would have created. When government fails to uniformly and justly enforce property rights they contribute to the wealth and the power of the well placed few, suppress the economic potential of the rest, and support giant monopolies that enslave the public. Some in Congress and the White House continue to follow the lead of their giant multinational campaign donors like lambs…pulling America along to the slaughter.

All this patent troll and ‘reform’ talk is mere dissembling by China, huge multinational thieves and their paid puppets. They have already damaged the American patent system so that property rights are teetering on lawlessness. Simply put, their intent is to legalize theft -to twist and weaken the patent system so it can only be used by them and no one else. Then they can steal at will and destroy their small competitors AND WITH THEM THE JOBS THEY WOULD HAVE CREATED. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals ship more and more American jobs to China and elsewhere overseas.

Do you know how to make a Stradivarius violin? Neither does anyone else. Why? There was no protection for creations in his day so he like everyone else protected their creations by keeping them secret. Civilization has lost countless creations and discoveries over the ages for the same reason. Think we should get rid of or weaken patent rights? Think again.

Most important for America is what the patent system does for America’s economy. Our founders: Jefferson, Franklin, Madison and others felt so strongly about the rights of inventors that they included inventors rights to their creations and discoveries in the Constitution. They understood the trade off. Inventors are given a limited monopoly and in turn society gets the benefits of their inventions (telephone, computer, airplane, automobile, lighting, etc) into perpetuity AND THE JOBS the commercialization of those inventions bring. For 200 years the patent system has not only fueled the American economy, but the world’s. If we weaken the patent system, we force inventors underground like Stradivarius and in turn weaken our economy and job creation. For a robust and stable economy America depends on a strong patent system accessible to all -large and small, not the watered down weak system the large multinationals and China are foisting on America.

For the truth, please see

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
More arrow