Ryan Seacrest's Typo Blows Off Injunction, Sells Thousands Of Possibly-Infringing Keyboards

from the lots-of-ways-to-be-wrong-and-Typo-found-most-of-them dept

Ryan Seacrest’s Typo (because it is never to be referred to simply as “Typo” in headlines or opening paragraphs), maker of physical keyboard accessories for iPhones, was sued by RIM (maker of formerly-popular Blackberry phones) for patent infringement earlier this year. The ailing phone manufacturer took issue with the keyboards made by Ryan Seacrest’s Typo, which it felt veered a bit too close to “looking damn near like a Blackberry keyboard.”

The fact that most keyboards look like other keyboards notwithstanding (although the Ryan Seacrest’s Typo keyboard did seem to cop a lot of the “look,” if not the “feel” of Blackberry’s vertically-aligned and contoured keys), the judge found RIM’s claims substantial enough to grant a preliminary injunction barring the sale of keyboards. Ryan Seacrest’s Typo apparently thought an injunction was nothing more than a fancy way of saying, “do whatever the hell you want to.” (Court order PDF)

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick agreed to let BlackBerry proceed with contempt of court proceedings after the Canadian phone maker showed that Typo has been selling keyboards in violation of the earlier order.

“I am very concerned with what appears to be deliberate contempt of the preliminary injunction by Typo,” wrote Orrick, pointing out that the company shipped around 15,000 keyboards despite the ban.

The court order touches on a lot of seeming wrongdoing by Seacrest’s Typo, including multiple shipments being sent to Canada, the Middle East and Asia (Typo claimed these foreign sales weren’t bound by the injunction) and a large sale to a reseller (4,000 keyboards to SMI Investments — a company that Typo seems to be intertwined with) that occurred after the injunction was ordered but before it went into effect.

Seacrest’s keyboard company also went out of turn by asking the court to find that its modified keyboard does not infringe on RIM’s patents.

According to [Judge] Orrick, the existence of a “supposedly non-infringing design” was not relevant to the existing injunction. The judge added that Typo would have to bring a separate court proceeding to get an order related to the new designs.

Whether or not you agree that RIM’s patent infringement case has merit, Typo seems to have completely botched its response. Sure, all the cool kids and their acts of civil disobedience have netted them contempt charges over the years, but blowing off a preliminary injunction in this sort of case is hardly sticking it to The Man.

As for RIM, this lawsuit may be going its way, but it doesn’t really change the fact that a competitor saw a market niche and filled it. People still like physical keyboards, but they don’t seem to care much for Blackberries. If RIM wasn’t so stuck on the “you only get the keyboard if you buy the phone” strategy, it might have been able to capture this market before anyone else got to it, rather than just play spoiler by suing anyone veering too close to its look-and-feel.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: blackberry, rim, typo

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Ryan Seacrest's Typo Blows Off Injunction, Sells Thousands Of Possibly-Infringing Keyboards”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Adrian Lopez says:

“The fact that most keyboards look like other keyboards notwithstanding…”

I wonder what today’s keyboards would look like had IBM claimed a trademark on the “look and feel” of its famous Model M computer keyboard. Indeed, what would a lot of today’s products look like were they routinely required to avoid their products looking too much like their kind?

Gerard Pierce says:

Re: Re:

Most current readers are probably not aware of the lawsuit that Adobe won against Borland due to “look and feel” issues of their spreadsheet programs. This happened around 1990 It took 10-15 years to get the $50M judgment revoked. Borland was still able to be competitive, but the judgment kept them from getting financing. It even kept them from selling the company to someone larger. By the time the judgment was overturned Borland had been seriously crippled. The bean counters took over. Felippe Kahn, the genius behind Borland, had been forced to resign and little by little one of the better companies in the industry sank below the sea.

Adobe never made a buck from the suit, but the destruction they caused was worth more than the entire value of their own company.

The rest of us got to pay the price for this BS lawsuit in that we lost a company that was able to things that Micro$oft never did. “Look and feel” my aching b#tt.

Anonymous Coward says:

The court order touches on a lot of seeming wrongdoing by Seacrest’s Typo, including […] a large sale to a reseller […] that occurred after the injunction was ordered but before it went into effect.

What’s wrong with this? If a court says an injunction only applies as of a certain date, how can they say anything done before that date breaches the injunction? That’s the entire point of having an “effective date”. Otherwise they would have written “effective immediately”.

Anonymous Coward says:

Oops

I have read the applicable documents. Sorry, but Seacrest is wrong. The injunction went into effect on 15 April 2014 when Blackberry posted the required bond, AFTER which Seacrest sold or delivered an additional 11,000 units, in violation of the order. Let’s see if he can pull off another Prenda scam to get out of it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...