Dutch Ruppersberger Proposes Replacing Bulk Metadata Collections With Targeted Pen Register Searches

from the time-for-the-NSA-to-get-out-of-the-bulk-collection-business dept

One of the ranking members of the House Intelligence Committee has just handed down a rather sensible proposal that would take the “bulk” out of “bulk collection” and allow the records to remain at telcos rather than being stored by the NSA or another third party. (Hint: it’s not Mike Rogers.)

The suggestion runs as follows:

The concept, which Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said he is still refining, would require court review of numbers that the phone companies are asked to search against. But it would not call for a requirement that companies hold data longer than they do now…

Details would have to be worked out, but, he said, the idea would be to send suspect numbers, which a court has deemed to meet the standard, to all phone companies. They would search daily against this list and send back to the NSA any numbers that hit up against the list.

Ruppersberger’s proposal (which he says has sprung out of “serious discussions” with Rep. Rogers) retains the RAS (Reasonable Articulable Suspicion) stipulation that currently governs the NSA’s searches of the stored metadata, but it does loosen other restraints — namely, that the searches be constrained to targets of “authorized investigations” and “agents of foreign powers.”

If this sounds all too familiar, there’s a reason for that.

Some analysts say that what Ruppersberger appears to be proposing looks very similar to existing authority under the “pen register” provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. That provision enables the government to order a phone company to send back in real-time “dialing” information, such as phone numbers, if the government can show the information sought would be “relevant to an ongoing investigation to protect against international terrorism” or espionage.

This pen register concept was thoroughly bastardized by FISC judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in 2004 to give the agency permission to use an open-ended (but targeted) surveillance technique as a way to grab every phone record from telcos in three-month chunks (granted in perpetuity by the FISA court).

But the pen register statute hasn’t been written off the books. It still exists and is, in fact, still used occasionally by the NSA, which prompts the following question: why bother introducing new legislation and new guidelines? Why not just make the NSA adhere to the existing statute (albeit one not so thoroughly distended by a previous FISA court decision)?

“So the natural way to solve this problem is not by creating a new authority, but by taking the existing authority designed for exactly this purpose, and narrowing it so it can’t be again used for bulk collection,” said Julian Sanchez, a fellow at the CATO Institute and surveillance expert.

The problem with new laws is that it adds to the number of exploitable tools the NSA can use. As noted above, this eliminates some of the limits governing the bulk records collection. While arguably better than the unlimited metadata harvesting the NSA has done for most of the last decade, the public would be better served by simply requiring the agency to follow existing pen register statutes, provided, of course, the FISA court restores the definition back to its original form.

It is good to see another legislator pushing the NSA back towards targeted surveillance, something it increasingly abandoned in the wake of the PATRIOT Act, especially one that has the misfortune of working closely with Rep. Mike Rogers.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Dutch Ruppersberger Proposes Replacing Bulk Metadata Collections With Targeted Pen Register Searches”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Getting aggravated says:

Techdirt site becoming unusable

For you gentlemensies and ladies of the technical support persuasion, the following message is making the site almost unusable.

A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.

The variations in problem js code being flagged are as follows:

Script: http://ws.sharethis.com/button/buttons.js:1

Script: http://a.postrelease.com/serve/load.js?async=true:1

I suggest that this be investigated, it may be affecting a number of us from the antipodes and nether regions of the third rock.

fairuse (profile) says:

Re: Techdirt site becoming unusable

Dear Aggravated,
Are you using Firefox with a load of tuner extensions that may be getting in each others way? Maybe you are using Chrome with some god awful plugin waiting on a status that will never happen? i do not know therefore the folks who can fix things need that kind of info from you.

I have never had that problem using Safari and Chrome. Turn off “stuff” till the browser is factory clean and see what happens.

Trying to help ๐Ÿ™‚

Getting aggravated says:

Re: Re: Techdirt site becoming unusable

The problem has only been in the last two days and the only site that is affected is Techdirt. I have 21 system updates available (using Centos 6.5 and Firefox 24.3.0).

No updates to my extensions or plugins, no user scripts configured. The problem seems to be with some of the offsite scripts being run, the same two ones. It may be related to the fact of not being in the northern hemi.

Thanks for the suggestions. I have actually avoided Chrome after one awful experience with it on another machine.

One can only hope that the problem is fixed soon.

Lurker Keith says:

Re: Re: Techdirt site becoming unusable

I had some excessive loading just now (I just hit [esc] to stop it), & the only Chrome extensions I’m using are a search ranker from my AV (that shouldn’t even be triggered here) & an AdBlocker; both have been running for a little while, & I just noticed this loading issue today.

My system should be up-to-date, since there were updates just a day or two ago.

I have noticed that once in a while, Techdirt will implement some kind of change (often a change to that pop-up thing I don’t like, which is currently missing — sometime the AdBlocker catches it, sometimes it doesn’t, I think), & similar loading issues follow.

pixelpusher220 (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Exactly, there are still ‘searches’ being done against ‘everybody’ which is the main problem.

Maybe you could call this a small step forward but a pen-register isn’t a ‘search against’ (the Rep’s actual words), it’s a list of who called/was called by a specific number. It’s a, wait for it, register (or log) of activity. Not a search against EVERYTHING.

That One Guy (profile) says:

A rather important question:

…which a court has deemed to meet the standard, to all phone companies…

Which court is the question. If it’s the FISA ‘court’, then they could, almost literally, have a request for ‘Every single number in the US. Because national security. And terrorism.’ and the only thing that would slow the FISA ‘court’ down would be finding the ‘Approved’ stamp.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...