Patent Troll Sues The FTC, Saying It Has A First Amendment Right To Shake Down Companies Using A Scanner

from the good-luck-with-that dept

We’ve written a few times about patent troll MPHJ, a company which had a bunch of bizarrely named shell companies sending threatening letters to thousands of small businesses, demanding $1,000 per employee, if those companies happened to have a network connected scanner that had the common “scan to email” feature. MPHJ claimed it had a patent that covered this, and wanted to go after the end users with threats, in order to clean up on “settlements.” MPHJ had become one of the poster children for extreme patent trolls abusing the system, and various states had begun suing the company for threatening local businesses. In fact, just today, NY apparently settled with MPHJ — and revealed that MPHJ acquired its five patents for… $1.

When the FTC began investigating patent trolls, apparently MPHJ was near the top of its list, to the point that it was preparing to file a lawsuit against the company. MPHJ took the rather aggressive route of suing the FTC and its five commissioners directly.

MPHJ claims that the FTC’s action “violate MPHJ’s constitutional rights.” It claims that the FTC has “no authority to regulate or interfere with the patent enforcement activity at issue…” This seems to ignore a Supreme Court ruling from just a few months ago that showed that the FTC does, in fact, have a mandate over patent enforcement issues, when that enforcement goes into areas that the FTC regulates, such as antitrust violations or unfair or deceptive commerce practices — basically the core stuff the FTC regulates.

On top of this, MPHJ argues that it has a first amendment right to shake down companies for money. It’s going to have a very difficult time supporting that argument. It seems unlikely that MPHJ’s case will get very far. However, the FTC’s suit against MPHJ may spell a world of trouble not just for it, but for other patent trolls, who may want to take notice.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: mphj

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Patent Troll Sues The FTC, Saying It Has A First Amendment Right To Shake Down Companies Using A Scanner”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
out_of_the_blue says:

Well! Mike almost sorta derides any corporate "First Amendment Right"!

Of course, all changes when it’s Google trying to get a court to let it publicize and unverifiable number of NSA requests on basis of its “First Amendment Right”: last year that doubly phony premise got half a dozen puff pieces for Google right here on Techdirt.

Must be difficult for Mike to decide whether patent trolling over-rides pushing a mythical “First Amendment Right” for corporations.

But mainly this shows that the legal system still does kinda work: it’s just that you kids aren’t used to how SLOWLY the system works.

So many self-referring links here is good excuse to run out the original tagline #1:

Take a loopy tour of! Old assertions prove new assertions!



Re: Re: Well! Mike almost sorta derides any corporate "First Amendment Right"!

You are aware that people work for corporations, right?

Meaning that your corporate masters will be free to exploit your labor in order to corrupt the government. Meanwhile, if you dare speak up on any subjects of relevance you will be FIRED.

Just look at everyone willing to throw that Duck Dufus under the bus.

memphisslimsan says:

Re: Well! Mike almost sorta derides any corporate "First Amendment Right"!

Are you male or female? Somebody here once claimed you were a female. I’m not so sure. I’m thinking male, mid 30s, low-level IT guy, single, ignored/reviled by females, especially at your workplace, and not many friends. Smart, but not college educated, thinks that InfoWars is a good source of knowledge… Trolling this site where no one respects your opinions at all is your futile life’s work.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Well! Mike almost sorta derides any corporate "First Amendment Right"!

It’s actually this joker:

Not that many here believe it, but I’ve had enough run-ins with her to recognize the crazy when I see it.

She’s a failed content creator, pseudo-anarchist conspiracy theorist, and hater of Google and Mike. I think it’s because she feels a need to go after anyone she feels has slighted her. Meanwhile, since her insane rantings have got her ZERO followers, she comes here to grift off Mike’s blog. She’s a sort of mascot, really.

MrWilson says:

Re: Re: Re: Well! Mike almost sorta derides any corporate "First Amendment Right"!

I would guess that’s not her. The writing patterns and word-spellings aren’t consistent between the two. OOTB is actually less articulate than Catherine Fitzpatrick. OOTB hyphenates “over-ride,” whereas Catherine spells it “override.” She also doesn’t seem to have the punctuation issues that OOTB has. It’s entirely possible that there is more than one person who obsessively hates Mike and Techdirt and supports the absurd opinions that OOTB has espoused.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t recall blackmail and extortion being ‘protected speech’ according to the first amendment, and yet they seem to be arguing just that… well, assuming the judge hasn’t suffered recent brain damage, the ruling as they rip that argument to pieces should be entertaining at least.

Zem (profile) says:

On a side issue.

This is an extreme example where a corporation has all the rights of a citizen, and demands those rights be preserved, and yet takes none of the responsibility of a citizen.

I do believe we need to re-examine what rights a corporation is given. As a citizen, if I break the law, I go to jail. As a corporation, if I break the law, I pay a fine. This is not an equitable outcome.

Anonymous Coward says:

Kinda surprised that Mike hasent covered their other bone headed move this month…

I hope that Coke doesn’t just pay up a settlement out of court and fight this… but modern business practices have shown a distinct lack of a spine in recent years.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Sadly, for the larger companies(and the smaller companies their spineless payouts allow to be shaken down), most of them see it as more ‘cost effective’ to just pay out to the parasites, not realizing it does nothing more than put up a huge freakin’ ‘FREE MONEY HERE!’ sign to all other parasites, who will shortly be crawling out of the woodwork to get ‘their’ cut.


Re: Re: Don't kill the host!

…except this whole situation came to a head precisely because the parasite in question broke the first rule of being a parasite. YOU DON’T KILL THE HOST.

If they are asking as much from Coca-Cola as they were from the small fry then it’s already cheaper for the victim to fight. That’s why there was resistance from the smaller victims. The amount was so large that it was painful. It was painful enough to cause people to resist.

Take a large corporation and $1000 a head is plenty for any legal battle including a patent fight.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...