John Steele Dismisses His Defamation Lawsuit Against Alan Cooper And Anonymous Internet Critics

from the perhaps-he's-got-other-things-to-worry-about dept

Today’s quite a Prenda Law day around here. While the focus has reasonably been on the upcoming showdown on Monday, where Judge Otis Wright has ordered all of the Prenda players to be in his courtroom on Monday, John Steele has apparently dismissed his defamation case against Alan Cooper, Cooper’s lawyer Paul Godfread and a bunch of anonymous commenters who have been mocking Steele mercilessly for months. Perhaps Steele realized that the case would open him up to discovery, which could reveal some things he’d prefer not to reveal to a court. Or, perhaps, he’s suddenly realized that he’s going to be busy dealing with the fallout from the Wright hearings. Or, perhaps there’s another strategy as yet unrevealed. Given Steele’s history of searching for and testing out all kinds of loopholes in the hopes that something works, it wouldn’t surprise me to find out that this isn’t the last we hear concerning this attempt to “out” his critics.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: prenda, prenda law

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “John Steele Dismisses His Defamation Lawsuit Against Alan Cooper And Anonymous Internet Critics”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
G Thompson (profile) says:

Too little too late and it's without prejudice

It’s only a voluntary dismissal without prejudice so I think the best thing would be now that Steele has given the suggestion that he is willing to do this sort of action (unless this was initiated by someone else on his behalf and that’s a whole different type of bullshit) then a motion for declaratory judgement initiated by ALL relevant parties INDIVIDUALLY (They might be joined eventually at the courts discretion only) should be performed to make sure that this sort of ‘at face’ malicious, vindictive, and dare I say idiotic action is not performed by Steele or his cohorts again!

G Thompson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Too little too late and it's without prejudice

AFAAIK yes they still are and when you actually look at the three suits together they are so similar as to be basically the same (and most likely would of been joined in some way if all came to hearing stage) so Steele still gets to fish and play and confabulate just as an invisible entity of Prenda and his partner in idiocy Duffy.

btw.. Prenda and Steele we know you are watching… I’m more than willing to be a party to any idiocy you want to initiate.. This is NOT an anonymous account and my personal twitter (and web page) is fully linked. I love the challenge of pursuing idiotic petulant egoist’s like yourselves.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...