If It Comes With A Gagging Clause, It's Not Open Data

from the going-off-the-rails dept

One of the richest seams of open data concerns transport. After all, by their very nature, transport systems generate huge amounts of new data every day — times, routes, travel options. Similarly, huge numbers of people use multiple means of transport, which means there is a big potential audience for analyses of that data. And it’s definitely in the interest of transport operators to make that information freely available so that developers can use it in new ways, since that is likely to make traveling easier, and lead to increased custom.

Despite that manifest logic, transport companies have been slow to release that data in a form that developers can use. And even when they do, it often comes hedged around with conditions that make it useless. Here’s an example from the UK, where Alex Hewson has been trying to get hold of live train data to create applications using it.

As his fascinating blog post explains, something called the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) collates the primary data:

Through its subsidiary TISL (“Train Information Services Limited”, more commonly known as NRE / National Rail Enquiries) ATOC owns a datasource called Darwin. If you want an API for querying live train running information complete with all the delays and cancellations at any given moment they’re the only shop in town.

Fair enough, you might think, since it’s their data. But it’s not quite so simple:

[ATOC] look a bit like a public body but aren’t, instead taking funding from the various train operators. ATOC are fond of making the claim that they don’t take a penny of public money but it’s somewhat disingenuous: their funding comes from train operators and many of those have been subsidized by [UK] taxes.

To be exact, the UK’s train operators receive over $6 billion from taxpayers each year. This means that there is a strong case for the train data to be released as open data — over and above the fact that doing so will probably increase the number of people traveling by train, which has got to be good news for the train operators that fund ATOC.

As a series of blog posts by Hewson reveals, the relationship between ATOC and developers has not been of the best, especially once a formal license to use the data was required in 2009.

During a “Developer Engagement Day” in January this year, and responding, perhaps, to criticism over the way it makes this publicly-funded data available, NRE expressed a desire to work with the development community more constructively. Hewson was naturally keen to see the details of the license that was being offered in the wake of this new openness, and noted a couple of unusual elements:

There are clauses saying you’ll lose access to the data if you bring TISL into “disrepute” and that the signatory may not publicly discuss the subject without written consent from TISL.

15.2. Either party shall be entitled to terminate the Agreement on notice without liability at any time if:

15.3.1. the Customer brings TISL, the TOCs or the passenger rail industry into disrepute

Disrepute is a fabulously broad word — it covers anything that blackens their name even if what you said was true. In other words you aren’t allowed to criticise them.

It gets worse:

No public announcement, communication or circular (other than to the extent required by law) concerning the subject matter of this Agreement shall be made or despatched [sic] by the Customer without the prior written consent of TISL.

WTF. You can’t use the live UK train data without accepting a gagging clause.

TISL/ATOC clearly still has a lot to learn about how to work with developers, to say nothing of what it means to make information generated with the support of taxpayers freely available as open data, as is fast becoming the norm in many countries.

By a happy coincidence, the body that oversees the national railways in the UK, the “Office of Rail Regulation”, has been conducting a review into “how NRE deals with applications for access to its RTTI database (‘Darwin’).” I’m sure many of the developers who have had dealings with ATOC’s subsidiary over the last few years will have submitted their views on this topic. I can’t wait to read them.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “If It Comes With A Gagging Clause, It's Not Open Data”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Pete Austin says:

Aargh! Consultation's Closed

“Real Time Train Information – a consultation by ORR on the findings from its review
Reference: ORR/013/2012
Date published: 7 December 2012
Start date: 7 December 2012
Closing date: 28 February 2013″

Note the dates. I hate it when an author gets me riled up about a subject and all ready to contribute to a consultation, but tells me just too late!

Vidiot (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Better yet, do what Flight Aware, Passur and others do for aviation: Delay the “live” info by ten minutes, so you can’t use your USB bazooka launcher for unattended rail terrorism. Then publicize the fact that your data is ten minutes behind, and let riders do the math. Simple!

I once saw a barroom clock, traditionally set 20 minutes fast, with a hand-lettered sign taped to it: “This clock is 20 minutes fast.” Brilliant.

Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Fake sensationalism on TechDirt. Surprised?

You can’t discuss the terms of the agreement. That has nothing to do with the use of the actual data itself. And the licensor doesn’t want you to embarrass them. Big whoop.

I expect this kind of stupidity and sensationalism from Masnick, but not you Glyn. Please do better next time.

xoxo, Anonymous

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Fake sensationalism on TechDirt. Surprised?

Oh, it worked in Denmark, where the journalist with the most knowledge about DSB and the highest production of critical articles was hired by Waterfront as a consultant. The work he did was payed for by DSB to keep him from writing critical pieces about the company as it says in internal mails between DSB and Waterfront. Having hit the surface Waterfront has been shown to be a bit more creative in how they interact with politicians. Basically they created detailed profiles about every politician having oversight over DSB and therefrom acted as lobbyist without giving that information.

Since DSB is publically owned all of the above is pure golden hyper-reality better than what most paranoid criminal novelists can come up with! It is getting invested at the moment at an extremely limited capacity… By DSB!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...