Cybersecurity Bill Fails To Move Forward In The Senate (Again)

from the why-did-they-bother dept

As was widely expected, Harry Reid tried to bring the problematic Cybersecurity Act back from the dead today. He needed 60 votes for cloture, which would have then allowed the bill to actually be debated upon (with various amendments considered as well). However, after a few short grandstanding speeches, the attempt at cloture failed, 51 votes to 47, well short of the 60 votes needed. Harry Reid then got up and lashed out at his colleagues, basically saying that he and other Cybersecurity supporters have been spreading so much FUD about how we’re going to be attacked that he can’t believe Senators didn’t fall for it. Of course, one of the problems is that all of the fearmongering failed to actually identify the problems or threats other than to handwave about planes falling out of the sky and similar fanciful stories. Furthermore, it fails to acknowledge that rushing through a bill that has significant impacts on privacy of the public — especially at a time when people are increasingly concerned about government snooping — is a bad thing. Reid admitted that the cybersecurity bill in this Congress is likely “dead,” though I’m sure something like it will be revived before too long. How about next time, rather than rushing it through and ignoring civil liberties, the government actually highlights the specific regulatory problems already in place, and why this bill is needed — and does so while including civil liberties advocates in the discussions?

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Cybersecurity Bill Fails To Move Forward In The Senate (Again)”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Yes, and I’m sure Congress will forever pretend that Google’s business model- one that is based on avoiding taxes, monopolizing internet search and making its money off content it didn’t create- isn’t incredibly dangerous and antithetical to the concept of a true free market economy.

A concept the US bases its economy on.

Oh yes indeed. This current scenario will absolutely live on forever into infinitum.

Oh happy days for everyone in Silicon Valley 🙂

Anonymous Coward says:

another case of a politician more concerned with having his name associated with some imaginary bill rather than no bill at all. if the same politicians were as concerned with real life issues that try to remove freedom and privacy from the people in the US and elsewhere by trying to bring in Fascist-like measures, it would be a much better choice

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...