Process Server Sues Righthaven For Unpaid Bills… From 2010

from the righthaven-just-looks-worse-and-worse dept

Another day, another story of Righthaven incompetence. The latest is that a process server that the company used, most likely for some of its hundreds of lawsuits against websites for supposedly infringing on copyrights, is now suing Righthaven for failing to pay its bills. The lawsuit, embedded below, is pretty straightforward. Legal Wings Inc. was used between May and October of 2010, for which it billed Righthaven to the tune of $5,670 — not a particularly huge sum. According to Legal Wings, Righthaven simply never paid, despite multiple requests to be paid. What strikes me as interesting here is that I can almost understand Righthaven’s recent efforts not to pay up the legal fees it owes, if you believe that the company is effectively out of cash and/or saving up its cash to fight the appeals. Obviously, there are reasonable arguments to be made that even that’s bogus, but if we can grant that assumption, the recent refusals to pay make at least some sense.

But this involves a company that Righthaven used in 2010. That is, this all happened way, way, way before Righthaven’s legal campaign fell apart. It happened many months before judges ruled that Righthaven didn’t actually hold the copyrights over which it was suing. In other words, this was back in the time when companies were still paying Righthaven good money. The company was supposedly flush with money, from both an investment from Stephens Media as well as settlement cash from sites that just paid up rather than fought. And it still refused to pay a simple $5,670 bill. It really makes you question what the folks behind Righthaven were really up to all of this time…

Filed Under: ,
Companies: legal wings, righthaven

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Process Server Sues Righthaven For Unpaid Bills… From 2010”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
27 Comments
That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Until the forensic accountants get access to the records that weren’t “accidentally” shredded, I’m pretty sure it is safe to assume that every dollar they got was quickly moved out of the company preping for the day they got caught.
It is however bad form to not pay the people who help you bring in the money.
It would be nice if the whole company was ruled a complete farce and not eligible for the protections of being a corporation, so they could pursue all of the people who put this into motion individually.

Anonymous Coward says:

Righthaven were always engaged in “legal” blackmail,
those who “worked” on their behalf had the same opportunity as everyone else did to judge what kind
of people would engage in such activity.
For some reason they found it acceptable.
It’s nice that Righthaven are getting smacked around by even their hired minions now,
but I doubt anyone has any real sympathy for the minions either.

I know some people have difficulty in distinguishing between what is legal and what is right or just, but it really isn’t all that difficult.
Live by misuse of the law and you will suffer and even face utter destruction at the hands of the law, a lesson sure to be overlooked by the **AA’s and all their kind.

ltlw0lf (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

Indeed, they only know what they are serving, not the merits.

Absolutely agree, but this whole thread reminds me of the discussion in Clerks about the contractors on the Death Star. These guys may not have known what they were dealing with, but they had to have some clue that the company was shady and they probably weren’t going to be paid. I suspect, at the very least, the process servers are going to be a little more careful in the future about who they do jobs for.

Suja (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I know some people have difficulty in distinguishing between what is legal and what is right or just, but it really isn’t all that difficult.

about the only ones who have difficulty are those who know they can get away with abusing it, unfortunately

Live by misuse of the law and you will suffer and even face utter destruction at the hands of the law, a lesson sure to be overlooked by the **AA’s and all their kind.

i’ve seen/heard of/read about too many who have lived, and died, by misuse of the law without ever facing a single repercussion for it to have hope in that anymore

just too few in power who care to stop it and too few who would do so who are (and ever will be) in power

it’s alot of odds stacked in favor of the abuse

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Sure companies get away with it, but apparently not if the sole or primary business plan of these companies is to abuse the law, see ACS:Law in the UK and Righthaven in the U.S.

I still cannot get over the leniency and tolerance shown by so many judges and courts to these trolls however.
Surely people or a company can treat the courts with as much contempt as Righthaven have been demonstrating without some Judge somewhere actually doing something about it.

Right now, why isn’t there a warrant out for the no shows Pizzle and Drizzle or whatever their names are, and why is Mangano still getting to make shrugging motions and claiming he didn’t know what day they were supposed to turn up on.
http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/jan/06/righthaven-defendant-frustrated-again-debt-collect/

Hard to believe these people still aren’t taking their situation seriously and impossible to understand why the court is going along with it, they’ve already given them the rope to hang themselves many times over and they have done just that, what else are the courts looking for.

Scote (profile) says:

What happened to the threatened bankruptsy?

Righthaven told courts that it shouldn’t have to post a bond, intimating that it might file bankruptcy if it did. Now it seems like Gibson is to lazy and/or incompetent to even do that.

Say, any word on whether he showed up to today’s court ordered depo hearing? I’m kind of hoping to hear about a warrant for his arrest for failure to appear…

Andrew Webster (user link) says:

A process server only needs to know the title of the documents, not their content. An affidavit or declaration of service states which documents were served, so that is the only information in a document I need to know to complete it. Whether or not a case is frivilous (sp?), or that company has a legal right to bring the suit is not for the process server to determine.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...