Righthaven Files Emergency Motion To Try To Keep Its Assets

from the that's-not-going-to-work dept

Looks like Righthaven has finally reappeared… filing an “emergency motion” in the 9th Circuit appeals court trying to prevent Marc Randazza from continuing to move forward in the Hoehn case, where (as you may have heard) Righthaven has been ordered to hand over various assets (and the company’s righthaven.com domain is being auctioned off). Randazza has filed a response (embedded below) in which he goes back to bringing up Herman Melville’s classic story Bartleby the Scrivener, in which Bartleby never does any work because “I would prefer not to.” If that sounds familiar, it may be because Randazza used that line the last time Righthaven filed for an “emergency” stay in the same 9th Circuit Appeals Court… in the same case. That time the court rejected it, and as Randazza explains, there are tons of reasons to reject it again. You can read the entire filing explaining all the reasons that Righthaven’s emergency filing makes no sense — especially since it failed to bother to oppose many of the things it’s now fighting when they were happening in the district court. However, the key reason is simply procedural:

While it would be far more satisfying to see this motion defeated on substantive grounds, it fails cleanly as a matter of procedure. Rule 27-3(a) requires the movant?s counsel to make “every practicable effort” to notify opposing counsel before filing an Emergency Motion. Righthaven?s counsel failed to do so, and misled this Court about his efforts to do so. Hoehn?s counsel first learned of the Motion by receiving it through the Court?s cm/ecf system …. Only after receiving the Motion did Hoehn’s counsel receive a fax from Righthaven’s counsel notifying them of its intent to file this Motion

I used to think that Righthaven might make a useful law school case study some day, but now I’m wondering if there shouldn’t be an entire class studying Righthaven in order to teach lawyers exactly what not to do in handling cases.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: righthaven

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Righthaven Files Emergency Motion To Try To Keep Its Assets”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
FormerAC (profile) says:

Law school case study?

I used to think that Righthaven might make a useful law school case study some day, but now I’m wondering if there shouldn’t be an entire class studying Righthaven in order to teach lawyers exactly what not to do in handling cases.

The lawyers still got paid, right? This may indeed be a case study in law school, but only as an example of the stupid shit you can get paid to do as a successful lawyer.

Violated (profile) says:

Karma

This is like a slow motion train wreck.

Always a happy day when a Copyright Troll meets their fate set by Karma. A money making get-rich-quick scheme ending in bankruptcy seems Karma enough.

You would think a lawyer would know and follow the law better than your average Joe but arrogance always seems to fail them.

So one more on the way out and plenty more to follow.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »