DailyDirt: You Must Un-Learn What You Have Learned… Really?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

There is a lot of demand to improve the institutions of education in various ways. Creating an education system in the US seemingly costs a lot, and the results aren’t as tangible (or as favorable) as everyone would like it to be. But in order to improve, perhaps we need a closer look at what actually needs to improve. Here are just a few links on how we learn.

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: You Must Un-Learn What You Have Learned… Really?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Eric Barrett (user link) says:

So while I'm open....

….to the idea that learning styles don’t matter. I’m not sure this “study” proves it. I pulled up the actual research paper, and from what I read, they didn’t analyze the results of previous studies, so much as look at them and talk about their implications. (There’s no meta analysis performed, which is key to being able to draw conclusions from previous research. Their main complaint seems to be, “these weren’t experimental studies” which is a complaint that could be leveled against many / most psychological studies.)

They raise an interesting objection, but their own conclusion fails to live up to their own call of “evidence based” education.

Mike42 (profile) says:

Telling Kids their smart...

I would love to see a study of all the kids which were in “gifted” classes, and what academic achivements they made. I was in one throughout elementary and middle school, and to the best of my knowledge, I am the only one who actually used any of it.
Of the people I followed at all, one is a handy-man, two were drug dealers, and one just became an elementary school teacher after years of bartending, and one is a manager at K-Mart. My sample is completely ancedotal, though. I’d love to see a larger and more random study, but seeing as they’ve had gifted classes for at least 35 years, the data should be there.

Eric Barrett (user link) says:

So while I'm open....

Michael – I think that’s a possibility. But I bet the real culprit in these studies is that we’re just so good AT learning, that even if we learn better through visual or auditory styles, we can easily compensate by using other learning styles. If that’s the case you’d really only see a minor to modest boost in performance. On top of that, as you point out, it is impractical to teach in only one style. How many times do we ever learn something in a classroom that’s through only one learning style. We don’t ask kids to close their eyes while the teacher talks about math, or to only watch while the teacher points to pictures without talking.

It would be pretty unethical to do a long term study of teaching through only one method.

I’m entirely open to learning styles not existing, I just need some evidence to prove otherwise. 🙂

anon says:

different learning styles

My grandmother raised me, I remember her asking me if I didn’t hear her ask me to do , I replied, truthfully, that I had heard her, but didn’t remember what she said.

She told me she would help me remember _next_ time. Grandma had a razor strop to assist in that…

Valuable lesson learned: Don’t tell Grandma the truth.

Years later I took an instructor billet in the military, our job: make sure people don’t kill their own troops. This is a pass/die type class, there was no fail option. Everyone has to PASS a class like this, so we modified the training based on the student.

I don’t learn well from lectures, as my grandmother could attest, but I can learn from reading the material, or hands on. As a matter of record, lectures are the worst of all ways to transfer knowledge, but a minority of people are capable of learning that way, so it persists.

The problem is it’s hard to teach. Lectures are easy, and hands on requires a lot of personal attention that frankly some teachers don’t want to extend. Yes, I blame the teacher because I was one.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...