AT&T Wheel Of Lobbying Astroturf Fortune Lands On 'Latinos'

from the ah,-the-latinos dept

A few years back, we discussed an article by Declan McCullagh, which laid out some of the sneakier tactics of lobbyist groups to pressure the government to support some position using letterhead from various special interest groups:

“You go down the Latino people, the deaf people, the farmers, and choose them…. You say, ‘I can’t use this one–I already used them last time…’ We had their letterhead. We’d just write the letter. We’d fax it to them and tell them, ‘You’re in favor of this.'”

It looks like AT&T’s lobbyists went through the list and they’re back around to the top with the “Latino people.” Suddenly, and for no clear reason, The Hispanic Institute and the Latino Coaltion have decided that supporting the merger of AT&T with T-Mobile is of utmost importance to them. They’ve put out statements with such nonsensical claims like:

The proposed merger of AT&T and T-Mobile holds great promise for all Americans, and especially those of Hispanic heritage.

What’s in it for these groups? Money, mainly:

One DC insider informs us that rumblings on K Street suggest AT&T had called every civil rights group in the United States for support within fifteen minutes of the deal being announced. Fearful of losing AT&T donations — most of these groups quickly got to parroting prepared AT&T statements, unconcerned about the actual impact of a T-Mobile deal. Getting funding for a new events center apparently dulls any ethical pangs felt using your organization as a hired stage prop.

It’s really difficult not to be cynical when you see this kind of thing playing out. What’s really depressing is that no matter how many times this rather obvious practice is exposed, it just keeps on happening.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: at&t, t-mobile

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “AT&T Wheel Of Lobbying Astroturf Fortune Lands On 'Latinos'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Paul Alan Levy (profile) says:

And that is why is is better not to take corporate money at all

Public Citizen has not taken a position on this merger, but once thing we do here is follow a very strict rule that we simply do not take contributions from companies (or, indeed, from the government, or from unions). So, for example, although we often have legal positions that Google likes (such as on keyword advertising), when we want to take a position adverse to Google we don’t have to think about it for a moment. And when we do take a position that Google likes, nobody can suggest that it is because we are bought and paid for by Google (just to take one example of a company that spreads its money around widely in the non-profit sector).

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: And that is why is is better not to take corporate money at all

If Google participated in an astroturfing campaign like this one, they would get in all sorts of anti-trust related trouble. At least the mere suspicion of them doing this would get them investigated. But when AT&T does it, bureaucrats look the other way.

Chosen Reject (profile) says:

To AT&T, et al:

There seems to have been an issue at the printers. They printed more of my letterhead than I had requested them to. I am sorry to announce that I need some way of removing this superfluous stationary and would be much obliged if you can take it off my hands. I would be more than willing to accept a donation from you on behalf of the printers to help them pay the extra expense their mistake has caused them. If you find yourself in need of extra letterhead, I would be happy to supply it for you.

Thank you for your time.

Nicedoggy says:

People should organize the key to change things in politics is to follow people who succeeded doing it and we have some examples like the Koizumi children and the Tea Party(Yeah I know they are crazy).

We decide the things we want and put the people in place, we also make a list of appointed positions that need change and elect people who will do those things.

And there is just 2 things people need:

– A trusty organization.
– The tool to identify the issues people can agree and want.

Nicedoggy says:

Re: Re:

Just to make it clear there are position in the government that are not subject to elections where people have no say who goes there, those positions are appointed by representatives, those positions are what permit one police to transfer to another administration with little to no oversight and that needs urgent attention from the people, because it is the hidden power, presidents and senators are just punching bags for the public they are not that important, they don’t make decisions on their own, they get advise from those unelected positions that have the power to influence and determine polices.

James Carmichael (profile) says:

So the problem here isn’t that ‘the government is broken’ or ‘corporations are sneaky’, but rather ‘humans are selfish, greedy hoarding machines’.

Solution: geez, I dunno… kill all humans, Terminator style?

It’s a shame that these things happen. It’s a shame that most people will brush this story off without really thinking about it. It’s a shame that people who really need to read this story, won’t.

hwertz says:

3rd party

Agreed with nicedoggy. But, ultimately what is needed is to break the effective single party system. As much as Dems and Reps argue, they both favor large, intrusive, expensive gov’t (arguing over details of what they should spend the money the gov’t doesn’t have on). With 3 or more parties, and no clear majority, these politicians must have true discussion and agreement on topics, not rhetoric blaming problems on “the other party”.

biffula (user link) says:

eye opening

Politicians continual need to add money to their and their parties coffers will keep special interests pulling these types of shenanigans for eternity. We need to go to a type of system like the British. One month of campaigning and that’s it. But try to pass a law like this in the U.S. and it will only get shot down as unconstitutional. Sigh.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...