As Expected, Expectations Are Way Too High On Diaspora

from the you've-been-warned dept

Back in June, we wrote about some concerns we had about the amount of money and attention given to the NYU students who wanted to create Diaspora, a distributed Facebook. We had nothing against the project itself — a distributed Facebook sounds great, even if other, similar projects have failed. If someone can do it right, that would be fantastic. Instead, the worry is that the combination of massive attention and a ton of money so early would (a) set up ridiculously high expectations while (b) limiting the team in adapting to a changing market. It’s not clear if the second part is true, but the first part seems to certainly be coming true. When the team recently released it’s extremely rough pre-alpha code, suddenly a bunch of security experts and the press pounced on them for having all sorts of security vulnerabilities.

But, uh, that’s what you would expect at this stage of the game. It’s pre-alpha for a reason, and they released it by saying that it had lots of security flaws. Now, your standard startup could release this kind of code without a huge spotlight shining on them, and it would give them time to work through the issues. But with so much attention on Diaspora, suddenly the press feels the need to point out every little flaw, even at the stage when such flaws are necessary. Hopefully the Diaspora team doesn’t get exasperated by this — because it could also make them either clam up, or start focusing too much on responding to these trumped up worries at this stage of the game.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: diaspora, facebook

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “As Expected, Expectations Are Way Too High On Diaspora”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Modplan (profile) says:

Indeed, the entire reason why Diaspora is and has been released like this is to catch these problems and to spur development forward in general.

Sometimes I wonder if over use of the term beta for all sorts of things has raised expectations of alpha and even pre-alpha services. The article also seems to point to users who apparently didn’t take notice of any of these obvious concerns of alpha software.

I’ve even seen people calling Diaspora vapourware long before it reached the scheduled time of public release.

Adam Fisk (profile) says:

Haystack 2.0

We’re seeing a common problem here: really inexperienced developers trying to take on extremely complex problems. Maybe a symptom of all the Web 2.0 BS where you can just slap together a site in 2.0 seconds?

With these two projects, that’s the commonality. It’s much easier to come up with an idea than to execute it. As someone said, there are no good ideas, just execution. When you’re 20 years old you don’t necessarily understand that, and both these projects are not Zuckerburg throwing up a site called “thefacebook” — they’re really much more complex.

Svante Jorgensen (profile) says:

Why all the judging?

Why are people so quick to judge a project in such a early state?
In reality, nobody knows how the project is going to turn out, or if it is going to be executed well. Nobody knows how many security holes it will have or how easy it will be to use, when the team finally reach v1.0 (or even beta). Just because they don’t have a lot of experience, have too much money, too many expectations from others etc. etc., it doesn’t mean that they can’t make a piece of useful software in the end.

Personally I’m looking forward to see the result.

Joe Mink says:

Did they read the "pre-alpha release" part?

A pre-alpha release is expected to be bug-ridden and security flawed. It’s purpose is to demonstrate a concept an attract developers and funding. IT’S NOT FOR END USERS.

An alpha release is still expected to be bug-ridden, but mainly functional. It’s purpose is to begin the testing cycle for correction of major bugs and addition of new minor features. IT’S NOT FOR END USERS.

A beta release is expected to be fully functional, but still needing minor bug correction. IT’S NOT FOR END USERS.

And then comes the release candidate! This is a complete product, completely debug to the max of the abilities of the developers. It will soon be released except some major hidden bug is found. IT’S NOT FOR END USERS.

And only after all this we have a release version. This is the only one destined for end users.

It’s ridiculous to criticize a pre-alpha release because it’s bug ridden and security flawed. This is what you would expect about it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...