More Porn Companies Filing Mass Lawsuits Against File Sharers

from the easier-to-get-people-to-pay-up dept

While lots of attention has been paid to US Copyright Group, and its effort to bring mass automated copyright infringement “pre-settlement letters” to the US, it’s worth remembering that the pioneers of this sort of thing, Davenport Lyons and ACS:Law, used a lot of porn movie makers early on. That might be because that’s who first hired them… or, it might be because everyone involved figured that it was much easier to get people to pay up quickly and quietly if they were accused of downloading gay porn, rather than having to go to trial over the issue. This is not, of course, to say there’s anything wrong with gay porn for those into that sort of thing, but in general, most people probably don’t want to have it broadcast to the world that they’re involved in any sort of lawsuit over downloaded porn, gay or straight, with the case for settling being even more compelling for those who were not openly gay.

It appears that a similar calculus may have brought such lawsuits over to the US. It’s not clear if this is part of any coordinated campaign by a law firm, as we’ve seen elsewhere, but THREsq reports that 65 “John Does” have been sued for accessing a gay porn movie via BitTorrent in a Texas court.

The complaint reads like most of the other, similar complaints we’ve seen, explaining the basics of BitTorrent to establish the claim that these “Does” infringed on the copyright. Once again, it seems like an open question as to whether or not it’s actually legal to include all of these defendants in a single lawsuit. It’s also not clear if the goal here is to send similar pre-settlement letters, but that sure seems likely.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “More Porn Companies Filing Mass Lawsuits Against File Sharers”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

“While lots of attention has been paid to US Copyright Group, and its effort to bring mass automated copyright infringement “pre-settlement letters” to the US, it’s worth remembering that the pioneers of this sort of thing, Davenport Lyons and ACS:Law, used a lot of porn movie makers early on.”

For clarification, what does this “sentence” even mean?

out_of_the_blue says:

Assuming IP address = specific person is the objection I have.

That’s a major leap. It’s no trick to get IP address from any of the usual trackers: just look for it in your torrent client. For a court to allow that as sufficient identification to grant an invasive discovery order is to *assume* guilt from a mere *number*, and then that turns the courts into an extortion machine that works regardless of actual guilt.

By the way, so far as I know, IP address is the sole *reliable* identification you can get from a torrent client, as the ID strings they send out can be changed at will.

Ron Jeremy says:

O hai Techdirt! Can I haz lawsuits nao?

Noooooo, it are my birthday!
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/02542710174.shtml

Porn industry is not gonna kill itself because there’ll be always people producing porn. But the CURRENT players of the porn industry are gonna destroy themselves if they keep pursuing the copyright madness path. I’m not actually Ron Jeremy, by the way.

fred says:

OK, This has been ongoing in the UK for the last couple of years, This lot will probably follow the same method, this is:
1. Go to court to ask the Judge to issue a order demanding that the ISP’s release the names and addresses of suspected Copyright infringers (this has been done)
2. Send threatening letters to the suspected copyright infringers,
3. tell said people in the letter that if they fight the claim, then they will take the person to court and they will ask for many times the demand in the letter.
4. tell the people in the letter that they can make it all go away for a “small sum” in UK this is between £250 – £700.
5.Tell the people in the letter that it will cost many times this amout to contest and they will ask the judge to charge you with the their costs.
6. Ignore any Letters of Denial and just send another letter raising the cost
7. wait for the people to pay.
8. never have any intention of taking people to court, just “prey on the ones that pay”

As stated this has been ongoing with a few firms in UK:
ACS Law are the main ones, total letters sent – Enough to make them over 1Million pounds this year.
Gallant McMillan, new firm, just sent 1500 letters on behalf of “Ministry of Sound”
Davenport-Lyons – withdrew from the business when their reputation suffered. 2 of their solicitors are still under investigation by the Solicitors Regulating Authority.
Tilly Baily-Ervine – withdrew from the business when their reputation suffered.

This entire “business Model” has been called a “scam” and “Legal Blackmail” in the House of Lords
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwKbQVzR … re=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORBfs3QC … re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5GaZV8O … re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkPHV-U3 … re=related

Shaun says:

Joining all the parties

In federal court, I wouldn’t think you could join all those parties. I just read through a case that cited two cases, Direct TV v. Boggess and Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange, discussing the joinder rules.

Of course, I’m sure there cases that go against it as well. Essentially the holding was that several people acting independently, but performing similar actions (i.e. downloading porn) doesn’t satisfy the same transaction test in the FRCP.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...