Not Reading Ticketmaster's Terms Of Service Shouldn't Make You A Criminal

from the yet-again dept

There have been an awful lot of similar stories lately, but it is really quite troubling just how much the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is being abused to turn actions like not reading a website’s terms of service into a criminal offense. We had just recently discussed how this was playing out in a lawsuit involving Facebook and, but it’s showing up elsewhere as well. In fact, the judge in the Facebook/ case apparently based the decision on an earlier case involving Ticketmaster and a ticket reseller which used automated means to order tickets, that it could then resell.

In a similar case, it appears that there has been a criminal indictment of the company Wiseguy Tickets, who similarly automated ticket purchases from Ticketmaster’s website. This isn’t to say that ticket scalpers and resellers who buy up all the tickets aren’t necessarily a problem, but should they be criminally liable because they violate a website’s terms of service? The EFF and some others have now filed an amicus brief in the case, suggesting that this is a ridiculous outcome. No one should be criminally liable for not obeying the terms of service on a website. If that’s the case, it’s easy to make anyone a criminal. I could just quickly put up a terms of service that says something as ridiculous as “you must be 8 feet tall to read this website.” And, if you’re not, you’ve then violated the terms, and are guilty of criminal hacking under the CFAA — which could potentially result in jail time. That makes no sense, and the EFF is hoping the judge recognizes this:

“Under the government’s theory, anyone who disregards — or doesn’t read — the terms of service on any website could face computer crime charges,” said EFF Civil Liberties Director Jennifer Granick. “That gives Ticketmaster and other online services extraordinary power over their users: the power to decide what is criminal behavior and what is not. Price comparison services, social network aggregators, and users who skim a few years off their ages could all be criminals if the government prevails.”

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: ticketmaster

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Not Reading Ticketmaster's Terms Of Service Shouldn't Make You A Criminal”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

I was already disturbed by not being able to choose seats, by having to pay an outrageous fee, by seeing the price change during my enquiries, by getting different prices from different IP addresses, and by their restraint of trade tactics meant to put their competitors out of business. This development makes me so wary, I won’t be using their service at any time in the future.

So sorry, Cirque de Soleil, that you will be subject to collateral damage.

coco Was Screwed says:

I stopped using ticketmaster years ago. I just go the the venue and buy tickets…although some are actually adding fees to keep pace with all the fees ticketmaster charges so it’s a wash.

It is most annoying that ticketmaster charges me a “convenience fee” for the privilege of increasing their profit margins by not having to mail me a ticket…

Pearl Jam was right, Fuck You Ticket master

Anonymous Coward says:

It would be helpful to actually read the indictment, instead of simply relying solely upon EFF’s site.

The site posted its amicus, but not the indictment.

Maybe this is a case somewhat like the one in San Diego. Then again, maybe not. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that the US Attorney for New Jersey is not trying to stretch the law beyond its breaking point, but this is impossible to determine without a copy of the indictment in hand.

Anonymous Coward says:

License to Read this Post

By reading this text you accept this post’s license agreement. Any who fail to read aloud the entirety of the book, “War and Peace” in the next five (5) minutes are in violation of this agreement and must pay me the sum of all positive income They* generate for the next five million (5,000,000) years.

*”They” includes ancestors, predecessors, and relatives, infinitely recursively.

Anonymous Coward says:

an unreasonable tos would be unenforceable (you must jump through flaming hoop naked). the intent of the company is to create profit by abusing a system. that isnt something that anyone should stand up for. not surprising to see lessig and the eff on this one, sort of proves that they stand for some pretty low end people.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:


In that case there are at least three. I work with one of them. He writes in a “lowercase with some small amount of punctuation” style. He also doesn’t believe a word he writes, he just likes to troll. I’ll probably get kicked when we go to lunch for outing him though.

gilroy0 (profile) says:

This isn’t to say that ticket scalpers and resellers who buy up all the tickets aren’t necessarily a problem

Why are they a problem? I mean, I understand the annoyance factor. But doesn’t the existence of scalpers basically indicate that the venue underpriced the ticket? I’m no free-market ideologue, but I’ve never understood why scalping is problem legally or morally.

Ven says:

Re: Re:

Ticketmaster uses a (possibly anti-consumer) practice of changing ticket prices, sometimes from minute to minute, in some accusations even when the ticket is being purchased. Most scalpers now rely on computers watching the Ticketmaster site for a price drop and then use systems spread across many data centers to look like a flood of random people taking advantage of the deal. They then resell them not at inflated prices but at the non-sale market rate. Because these specials are likely quantity limited it prevents legitimate buyers from getting the savings.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

OK, but where is the ethical problem with scalpers here? It seems to me that it indicates a (big!) problem with Ticketmaster’s method of pricing, but doesn’t indicate the objection to those who are exploiting their bad design.

I, too, have never understood why scalping should be illegal. I am not a scalper, and have never been in a position where buying from one seemed like a good idea, but I don’t see how they’re doing anything so egregious that the force of law is required.

marybeth (profile) says:

It’s not as if the TOS with this info is a long document on another page. It’s a couple of paragraphs in the section where you search for available tickets for an event (between where you select the number of tickets and the “find tickets” button). If you read the first of the two paragraphs you would know you can’t use automated means to buy tickets.

dowlan smith says:

ticket scalping

As far as I see it, since TicketMaster sells ticket at price above what they pay for them, they are ticket scalpers also. They just want to use government coercion to limit competition.

TicketMaster is beneficial to the to the event holder because they lessen the risk for unsold tickets. However, I’m not sure why they are not subject to anti-trust regulation.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...