Langdell Still Claims Control Over The Word Edge; Sues EA For Mirror's Edge

from the step-away-from-the-edge dept

We’ve covered Tim Langdell and his ridiculous trademark claims for years. He’s the guy who got a trademark on the word “edge” for a video game fifteen or so years ago, and now seems to spend all of his time threatening and/or suing any game or app maker who puts the word “edge” in the title, even though there’s no likelihood of confusion, and Langdell’s own failure to actually release a game in many years raises questions about how valid the mark is. EA, who had been threatened by Langdell for its Mirror’s Edge game asked the USPTO to dump the trademark last year, claiming not only have the marks been abandoned, but that they were obtained via fraudulent means. The PTO is still reviewing that request.

However, Langdell is not sitting still. His lawyers kindly spammed me today with the news that they’re suing EA over this trademark. Not surprisingly, they play up Langdell’s position, and leave out the abandonment of the trademark, the lack of any likelihood of confusion and other pertinent details along those lines. Trademark law, despite Langdell’s apparent belief, does not give a company full control over a word, especially if they’re not using it. No one is confusing Mirror’s Edge with Langdell’s ancient games.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: ea

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Langdell Still Claims Control Over The Word Edge; Sues EA For Mirror's Edge”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

ONE WORD...just a bit over n over


Anonymous Coward says:

People rail against “trolls” who engage in patent litigation. Quite frankly, in is my view that far, far more problematic are general practice firms that hold themselves out as “IP experts” when, in fact, a much more accurate characterization would in my view be “IP dabblers”.

“Trolls” sometimes bring discredit on the patent system, but “dabblers” exact a much higher price across the board in so many more areas.

R. Miles (profile) says:

First software, next the world.

Best stock pile my shaving cream while I can.

Good thing there’s not a Monster Bogart Edge product out there. 3 lawsuits would be horrendous to deal with.

Seriously, it’s about time defendants of these cases are given automatic restitution against idiotic claims like this. I feel they should get $250,000 for every item they manufacture.

That’ll teach these plaintiffs.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...