Lori Drew Case Officially Dropped

from the good-news dept

While this should come as no surprise — since the judge basically said two months ago that he was planning to dismiss the ruling against Lori Drew — it’s worth noting that official ruling dismissing the case has been handed down:

The reasoning of the opinion is that whatever unauthorized access means, it cannot mean mere violation of Terms of Service without more. Such a reading of the statute would render the statute unconstitutionally void for vagueness because it would give the government almost unlimited power to prosecute any Internet user and wouldn’t give citizens sufficient notice as to what of their Internet conduct was criminal.

Phew. Whatever you think of Drew’s behavior, it was absolutely wrong to try to twist a totally unrelated law to find something to charge her with.

Of course, now, in the wake of this debacle, Missouri passed a new law making online harassment a potential felony, and the first case under that law has been filed.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Lori Drew Case Officially Dropped”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Oooohhhh, let's play mad libs for typical story responses...

Mike, you [adjectve][noun], how can you not see that Lori Drew is a [adjective] bitch and I hope she dies a/an [adjective] death!

She personally killed that [adjective] girl and nothing anyone says will make me think that she shouldn’t go [verb] herself with a [noun] in her [noun], you [adjective] blogger!

[verb] You!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Oooohhhh, let's play mad libs for typical story responses...

Oh! I’ll play!

Mike, you amazing bumblebee, how can you not see that Lori Drew is a visionary bitch and I hope she dies a/an enjoyable death!

She personally killed that fat girl and nothing anyone says will make me think that she shouldn’t go burn herself with a incandescent light bulb in her earlobe, you unappreciated blogger!

[verb] You!

bigpicture says:

Re: Oooohhhh, let's play mad libs for typical story responses...

There was no scheming there, of course not. How can you say that those actions were from the mind of a deviant? All those actions were to make a better world, and feed, clothe and house the dying children.

Phillip Garrido had something similar to say about how he was making a better world, to quote: “You’re going to find the most powerful story coming from the witness, from the victim,” he promised. “If you take this a step at a time, you’re going to fall over backward, and in the end you’re going to find the most powerful, heartwarming story.” It’s all just perspective or insanity, but never life affirming with respect to the other persons life.

The Cenobyte (profile) says:

Isn't harassment already illegal?

I had a dude arrested and jailed years ago because he would call and write letters calling me names, calling in the middle of the night, basicly being a jerk all around. The cops arrested and charged him with Harassment, he was fined and given jail time (Was not his first offence) and ordered to stay at least 1000′ from me at all times and 1000′ from any place that I might go (I listed hundreds of places all over town using mapquest to make sure most of downtown and the west end where locations he couldn’t go). So why exactly do we need a new law?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Isn't harassment already illegal?

seeing that you misspelled offense, I’m going to assume you’re European. In the US, it’s generally not illegal to be a jerk. Even if you do something “harassing” the worst you get is a restraining order – the only crime would be violating the restraining order. However, telephone harassment can be a crime depending on what you do and where you live. In the US, making “internet harassment” a crime would be a very new thing in most states. However, there’s still no real need for a new law since current law already allows you to (a) grow some balls and deal with it, (b) learn how to block certain things on the internet, or (c) get a restraining order.

davetopper says:

Re: Isn't harassment already illegal?

Harassment is illegal but, like in your case the internet is just another place.

A place where this person can create a fake e-mail account, ( way too easy at google ) can use proxy servers so his IP can never be traced, and be more trouble for you online and you have no recourse but to put up with it or leave the net.

You tell me with all that, that we need new laws. Where the internet is now concerned we may need more new laws rather than just one.

Sure its already illegal, but the internet like I said is a whole different place with it’s own jurisdiction.

That needs to change.

Matt (profile) says:

This is an interesting sticky thicket. If Drew had been seeking money (instead of just to embarrass or harass or whatever,) this certainly would have been a wire fraud and there would have been a (more rational) federal prosecution. That the harm was not financial doesn’t make much of a difference to me.

Criminal law is not well-developed to deal with problems like this (yet). The civil law is – no doubt, if it hasn’t already happened, the parents or estate will appropriately file an action against Drew and the various coconspirators for privacy torts, wrongful death, and the like.

Matt (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I should clarify – I agree with AC: harassment is already illegal. On the other hand, it doesn’t always do enough – a protective order would have been useless and redundant after Megan was dead. The criminal law should be developed to account for the increased ability to people to hurt each other with the Internet. But the criminal conduct was _not_ violating some website Terms of Service, it was taunting and bullying. The prosecutors’ overreaching theory was stupid. The judge did right.

DJ (profile) says:

Re: Re:

apparently you missed what Mike said, so I’ll c/p it here:
“Whatever you think of Drew’s behavior, it was absolutely wrong to try to twist a totally unrelated law to find something to charge her with.”

To clarify that, he’s saying that your opinion on what she did is irrelevant here, so we don’t wanna hear it. Instead let’s hear about your opinion on the ruling.

The Buzz Saw (profile) says:

Harassment on a controlled platform?

There really is no such thing as “harassment” on the Internet. Almost every site has tools necessary to deal with such annoyances. In Gmail, I can specify a filter to either delete incoming emails or direct them into storage (and “mark as read”) for evidence in court. On Facebook, I can remove someone from my friend list and block someone. I left MySpace almost 4 years ago (member for about a month), but I assume it has blocking mechanisms.

The only real grounds for harassment would be someone who repeatedly signs up under new names just to avoid your blocks. There MIGHT be a case there where someone is actively trying to throw themselves onto the victim, but other than that it amazes me how anyone can let themselves be bothered by stuff online.

Lori Drew Hater says:

lori drew die a slow painful death you fat fucking bitch!

I think that Grow a backbone ^^^^^ comment above sounds like lori drew to me, get the fuck out of here you fat dyke looking bitch. I hope you die a slow and very painful death. How fucking immature can you be to play someone like that. How can you live with your fat ugly dyke ass knowing you caused the barely teenage girl to be so upset she killed herself? So what if she said your daughter as an ugly fat bitch at school? I am sure she is if she is half as ugly and fat as you are she probably looks like jabba the hutt junior with ass breathe.

I am surprised you even have a kid! The father must be fucking blind or have been drunk as hell when he poked lori drews fugly jabba the hutt looking self. I bet Lori Drews daughter is a big bitch too!

I don’t generally wish ill on anyone, but I hope to one day hear about something bad happening to this bitch. She has got me wanting to go all voodoo child and put a hex on her fat dyke ass. If I was one of the neighborhood kids you better believe she would be getting egged regularly, especially her car. Your lucky you don’t live in my neighorhood you better never move here either, you better recoginize! You give americans a bad name.

Do us all a favor and legally change your name from Lori Drew to BigFat DykeLooking ChildKiller. That way no one will have any questions about your ass breathe self. If I ever see you in real life I will spit in your face and give you my monkeypox! I will keep an eye out for Lori drew, fucking bitch!

Cherryl Lewis says:

Internet Harassment

I think it is appropriate for the masses to continue to harass Lori Drew and her family. I can send her a post card every week for fun, since her whereabouts is being tracked and published on-line. It’s neat how the internet works that way so anonymous people can get away with communicating others, kind of like poetic justice, it is.


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...