Retail Stores Still Trying To Blame eBay For Shoplifting

from the seriously? dept

Just as the record labels like to blame file sharing for their own business model problems, big retailers have been trying to blame eBay for all sorts of their problems for years. Last summer, the National Retail Federation (NRF), who represents the lobbying interests of big retail stores, started peddling a patently ridiculous line that using eBay led to crime. Seriously. They claimed that people got so addicted to selling stuff on eBay, once they ran out of their own things to sell, they would start stealing. Why even paraphrase it? Let’s use their words:

“Thieves often tell the same disturbing story: they begin legitimately selling product on eBay and then become hooked by its addictive qualities, the anonymity it provides and the ease with which they gain exposure to millions of customers. When they run out of legitimate merchandise, they begin to steal intermittently, many times for the first time in their life, so they can continue selling online. The thefts then begin to spiral out of control and before they know it they quit their jobs, are recruiting accomplices and are crossing states lines to steal, all so they can support and perpetuate their online selling habit.”

The problem, of course, is that this is complete hogwash. They presented no evidence whatsoever on this, and the actual stats on retail theft showed two things: first, retail theft has been on the decline for years and, two, that most retail theft is due to insiders, not shoplifters. So, if the retailers really wanted to stop theft, they should invest in better security against insiders. Yet, when asked why they didn’t do this, a representative claimed that it didn’t make any sense to make their employees into police officers. Yet it does make sense to pass draconian laws against eBay?

The truth is that the retailers aren’t scared about eBay leading to shoplifting. They’re scared about eBay, period. And they want to pass any laws to hurt eBay.

Of course, when presented with the fact that their claims were ludicrous, the NRF refused to back down, insisting its statements were accurate — not in telling the actual truth, but in “reflecting the sentiments of many retailers that we work with.” Seriously.

And, of course, politicians don’t bother with fact, either, so the NRF was able to push legislation specifically designed to harm eBay and other online retailers, by adding all sorts of restrictions and liability over what can be sold through those sites. Of course, the NRF still has no evidence to back up its claims… so it looks like it’s decided to try to manufacture some.

It recently came out with a report that pretends to show evidence that eBay leads to shoplifting. What’s the data? Well, the NRF asked its own members what they thought the percentage of “new in box” merchandise for sale on eBay was stolen, and those members said they thought it was 50%. That’s not evidence. That’s just “reflecting” the highly biased “sentiments” of the NRF’s members. As the NetChoice link above shows, there are lots of other problems with the NRF’s position:

  • Despite retailers’ claims that theft is getting worse, nearly 6 in 10 retailers say they now spend less on loss prevention compared to last year. Yet while cutting spending on loss prevention, these same retailers doubled their spending on lobbying over the last three years, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And they are lobbying for new laws to restrict competition from online sellers.
  • A leading loss prevention consultant told retailers that over 2/3 of all store shrink is preventable, mostly by improving business practices, according to Larry Miller, Director of National Retail Research Group.
  • Retail theft is not being caused by the Internet. According to the NRF’s survey, retailers don?t identify stolen goods online any more than in traditional places like street corners, swap meets, and pawn shops.
  • The NRF says that criminals use online marketplaces because they are anonymous, but these sites know exactly who the seller is, and disclose all that data to law enforcement officials whenever they ask. The truth is, an online auction is the last place a criminal would try to hide the sale of stolen goods.
  • The NRF claims that online sellers “threaten the health and safety of innocent consumers”, yet Rite Aid, CVS, Target, and Walgreens have paid millions in fines for selling expired products–often by putting stickers over the expiration dates.
  • Overall, there is no evidence that organized retail crime has actually gone up — the study only asks retailers whether they think it has increased. And that perception has only increased over the last two years — concurrent with the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Isn’t it much more likely that any increase in store theft may be a result of employees and consumers desperate to make ends meet?

That first bullet point, of course, is the most telling of all. While all of the evidence points to the fact that its insiders who cause the majority of any problem, rather than spending on dealing with that, they’ve massively increased their lobbying spend to try to craft anti-eBay laws.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: ebay, nrf

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Retail Stores Still Trying To Blame eBay For Shoplifting”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Howard, Cowering says:

Here is a quote from the report:

“According to the survey, one-third
of retailers believe that more than 50 percent of ‘new in box’ merchandise sold through online auction sites is
stolen or fraudulently obtained, which is comparative to last year’s 34 percent.”

Report (pdf) URL:

NFR website URL:

That’s one third of 115 retailers – fewer than 40 retailers, and please note that it’s “comparative to last year’s 34 percent.”

Is there any chance that the lawmakers can look past the amount on the donation check and focus for a moment on the facts?

Silly question.

Anonymous Coward says:


Is there any chance that the lawmakers can look past the amount on the donation check and focus for a moment on the facts?

I’d be quite impressed if you can actually manage that little feat.

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” –Upton Sinclair

Aaron deOliveira (profile) says:

easier way?

“When they run out of legitimate merchandise, they begin to steal intermittently, many times for the first time in their life, so they can continue selling online.”

The thing I never understood about his claim is that none of these people with an “online selling habit” know how to purchase more inventory? That they some how find it easier to shop lift than to purchase and resell things? Recruiting accomplices and crossing state lines to steal seems like several times more complex and difficult than doing something like finding a wholesaler, etc.

Anonymous Coward says:

Yeah, um this I can believe. I used to work a job at the front desk of a busy mall-type building. Often when someone brought a lost item to my desk I’d put it in the lost and found box for about 2 weeks and if noone claimed it you can count on seeing the item on eBay, assuming it’s worth the small trouble.
Mostly cellphones, PDAs, MP3 players, and other small electronics like that were placed on eBAy. Most of the other things were either just tossed or are still in the lost and found box.
It may be stealing to some, and to others it may not be, but hey who cares. 9 out of 10 times the owners never came to get the item anyway.

romeosidvicious (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Another AC who doesn’t get the point. EBay doesn’t accept any item. They never see the merchandise, they never handle it, they never pay anyone for it. They offer a service that connects two entities: a seller and a buyer and nothing more. They do not have the same legal, moral, or ethical obligations as someone who is purchasing used merchandise. It’s not even the same market as pawn shops.

I must be having a really bad day…I am arguing with ACs again.

vastrightwing (profile) says:

The real threat is selling used goods

Yes, the real threat here is the secondary market. Retailers don’t sell as much new stuff when people are trading their used stuff. As we’ve read, game publishers want to stop the used goods market or figure out how they can profit from it. I’ve also read warnings on manufacturer’s websites not to buy their products from the “internet” for various “reasons”. This is the real target.

Sammie Houston (profile) says:

Watunes, The New Music Industry!

As representatives for the largest digital distribution in the world, we show artists & record labels how to benefit from a Digital Distribution relationship. Gone are the days of selling your music through a physical means. Statistics say 48% of teenagers purchased their music online in 2007 with that number increasing from 32% a year prior. If you are still slanging CD’s, you are quickly falling into the dinosaur arena. We can help you change all that.

Watunes offers services for the entire independent music community, whether you already have digital representation or are just getting started in the digital world. We make it easy to distribute your content to digital outlets, promote your content using our innovative marketing systems, and manage your catalog and sales using our first-class technology.

WaTunes is a social media distribution service that enables artists, groups, and record labels to sell music, music videos, and audiobooks through leading online entertainment retailers, including iTunes,ShockHound, and eMusic. Artists and labels can sell unlimited music and earn 100% of their profits – ALL FOR FREE! In fact, as of Tuesday June 9th, we signed NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Earl ‘the Pearl’ Monroe who owns record label Reverse Spin Records. The link is listed right below & you can either click on it and/or copy & paste into your browser. Please direct any further inquires, comments, questions, or concerns to us. We’re more than elated to serve you anyway we possibly can.



Earl “the Pearl” Monroe link: p;ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn

Sammie Houston
SVP, Client Services
Skype ID: sammie.houston
Office: 678-598-2439

Sneak Preview:

Youtube advertisements:

Check out our Reviews, add your comments & feedback too:

Chuck says:

What the hell is Sports Authority doing on eBay?!!!

I stumbled on Sports Authority hawking it’s stores inventory on ebay. Are they *ucking kidding! What the hell is going on? I thought ebay was just for small mom and pops and people just trying to buy and sell some things. Are these big corporate pricks trying to even move in on even the smallest businesses? How pathetic is this? I hope to God Sports Authority goes under. And soon! That goes for any piece of *hit corporate retailer out there. Take your corrupt practices and go to hell, douchebags!!!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...