No Surprise Here: Lost Votes In Last Election Due To Faulty Diebold Equipment

from the anyone-surprised? dept

Back in December, we pointed to yet another (in a long line) of stories about lost votes on an e-voting machine in an election in California. The machines in question were from Premier Election Solutions, the shiny coat of paint put on the e-voting unit of Diebold, whose name had been tarnished for a long history of defective, highly vulnerable e-voting machines (along with a long history of denying any problems whatsoever with those machines). You would think after all these years of criticism, and a shiny new name, the company would be a bit more careful to make sure its machines weren’t actually defective. No such luck.

As Slashdot points out, the Secretary of State’s report on the matter clearly places the blame on Diebold’s faulty equipment (warning: pdf file). Still, the scariest part is what we noted in the original story about the problems: despite all of the claims to the contrary, the 200 or so lost votes wouldn’t have been noticed at all under Diebold/Premier’s normal auditing process. It was only because of an experimental “transparency” project set up by local officials that the mistake was noted. Thus, Diebold machines in other regions may have lost votes, and no one will know about it. So can anyone explain why anyone still uses e-voting machines from this company? For years they’ve lied, stonewalled, denied problems, attacked critics… and produced faulty equipment over and over again. And it’s still being used.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: diebold, premier voting

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “No Surprise Here: Lost Votes In Last Election Due To Faulty Diebold Equipment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Roger says:

Why is it so hard, I don't get it...

We do billions of financial transaction everyday via electronic means. That’s money we are talking about, so it has to work pretty well. Why on earth can’t we conduct our voting electronically in a efficient and secure matter? Can’t we setup online voting, verify it via Pins, passwords, email, SMS, etc and even confirm it with physical letter if you want, there has to be a way that is easier and more secure that what we are doing.

Shane says:

Re: Why is it so hard, I don't get it...

we had a long discussion about this during the last Presidential election. I believe there is a very simple way to do this. A person goes to their local election supervisors office and registers for on-line voting using their voter registration number. At the time of registration they establish a password or pin. As the date of the election draws near you go to the online voting site and register at the site to place your vote online. On the day of the vote you log into the voting site, it asks you to confirm your voter information (previously setup at the supervisors office) once confirmed you are allowed to vote. At the end you received a tally of your votes which you electronically sign with your voter registration number and password. Your votes are then sent to 3 sites to be tallied (election office, online voting sites servers and independent auditing office) all of which verify receipt immediately. You also get a copy as proof you voted and what your votes were.

There is obviously room to improve and streamline, but as a starting point I think this is adequate and it takes malicious intent to manipulate the results.

Brad says:

Not "up for vote"

The problem is that this sort of thing isn’t really up for any kind of public review. What typically happens is a county voting supervisor gets a visit from a guy in a nice suit that says “You know how it’s expensive to collect all those votes? Let me do that for ya. It’ll cost you half.”

The guy listens carefully to the very polished presentation about security, auditability, hacker-proof, blah blah blah. He’s way out of his league, technologically, but it sounds good.

It goes to a committee. Typically a half-dozen old people who have been in local politics most of their autumn years, and prior to that ran local businesses and the PTA. They all listen to the exact same presentation, now backed by their colleague. They’re all served a nice dinner, paid for by the guy in a nice suit.

Then it gets dropped in as a footnote at some town hall meeting or other public forum. “Next year we’ll be using BrandY machines instead of BrandX. This will cut costs in half and get results faster.” The dozen or so citizens (mostly retirees and homemakers) that actually bothered to attend don’t know anything about what’s going on, and all nod in agreement. The plan moves forward.

Once the news is finally made public (a few weeks before the election, when there’s no time to change), the ACTUAL public hears about it. People talk about security concerns and are brushed off with excuses “Too late now” or dismissed as being crazy nuts.

That’s the problem with things like this – they’re not subject to actual public scrutiny and input – not for lack of trying, but for lack of interest. If I got local political news delivered with the skill and cadence of a CNN reporter I might listen. But instead, it’s relegated to the back page of the local free weekly, and has little to no thought or presentation.

I don’t have a solution here, but I do see how companies that are so bad continue to flourish with public money – they’re not selling to the public, they’re selling to a couple of people with a little more authority than they should have.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...