No, In-Flight Internet Is Not A Terrorist Threat

from the panic-stations! dept

The New York Times noticed over the weekend that some US airlines have begun offering in-flight WiFi, and that not everybody’s happy about it (via Wolfe’s Den ). There are the usual comments about passengers being annoying by making loud VoIP calls or not turning down the volume on YouTube videos, but inserted in is the unchallenged statement from a flight attendants’ union spokesman saying it fears “terrorists plotting a scheme on a plane could use Wi-Fi to communicate with one another on board and with conspirators on the ground.” As Glenn Fleishman points out, this is only slightly ridiculous. If you’re a terrorist, you’re hardly likely to se a ban on in-flight phone use as an impediment to communications, while the airplane’s WiFi system doesn’t enable any on-board communication that wouldn’t be possible with other technologies like Bluetooth, or even ad-hoc WiFi networks. There are plenty of more legitimate reasons to dislike in-flight WiFi, but the suggestion that it’s making planes unsafe is a fairly hollow one.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “No, In-Flight Internet Is Not A Terrorist Threat”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
TSO says:

Re: Re: Re:

> wouldn’t an altitude triggered device be a more effective less complex method?

AFAIK cargo compartments are pressurized :-b

And cellphones won’t work at 30000 feet. I tried.

And I was also talking about “pay ransom in 2 hours, or we’ll detonate the bomb aboard that plane. (And BTW it will self detonate if you decide to be smart and cut the wifi off.)”

See Shinkansen daibakuha (

John (profile) says:

Why stop at terrorism?

After all, pedophiles could be looking at porn by using the in-flight wi-fi! Won’t someone think of the children?!?!

I think it’s time we banned ALL technology from airplanes because anything can be used as a terrorist weapon or to hurt kids. That pillow? Yep, ban it- it’s a smothering threat. That book? Yep, ban it- you could use it to hit someone on the head.

That sharp plastic (or metal) knife which is included in the in-flight meal to cut the food? Sure, that’s fine. No terrorist would ever think to use something as obvious as a knife! Creating a master-plot using wi-fi is much more effective.

All joking aside, when will we grow up and get over the fear that anything can be used as a weapon if we think about it hard enough. Personally, I think this is how the terrorists won on 9/11: we’re now so afraid that something will be used “by terrorists” that we give up on an idea before it’s even had a chance.
Do we really, honestly think that terrorists are so sophisticated that they have wi-fi enabled bombs? Or are we still living fear that a terrorist could strike anywhere, at any time… or that a terrorist could be disguised as a 5-year old child who needs to be searched before going through airport security?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Why stop at terrorism?

While I feel that your smug comment about terrorists being ignorant cave-dwelling neanderthals who could never figure out Wi-Fi enabled detonators a bit ignorant of say… common news reports, from FOX and from BBC, I do recognize that banning “knives”, but allowing CDs and CD players is a silly concept. Anyone who has ever snapped a CD in two pieces knows that you have two large sharp objects as formidable a weapon as any box-cutter. So why are we banning nail-clippers again?

Your point was well founded up until you thought “the bad guy” was dumber than you/us. They (boogey-men) have a collective membership whose expertise may be in areas you are or are not versed in. To not expect technical proficiency is foolishness. For one instance, who would have thought that anyone should need fear anyone “so sophisticated” that could fly a commercial airline jet? I know I can’t — and I know that I could, if I took the time and effort to learn how. How is knowledge about Wi-Fi or nearly any other technology so vastly more difficult to obtain?

gyffes (profile) says:

Well, as long as we're discussing weaponry...

A laptop battery in one of those pillowcases? Coke can torn in half (I like the CD idea, hadn’t thought of that…)? Actually, the amount of damage to the human body that I could do with a bic pen is fairly astonishing. Next thing y’know, they’ll be taking away my MacBook Air ’cause it can cut Cake. Not the dessert item, the band.

Oh, no, we’re arming the terrorists! They’re comin’ for our IPs, Techdirt — FIGHT FIGHT WIN!

Anonymous Coward says:

Actually I agree that they should ban WiFi on flights. Think about it.

There I am merrily flying along when I get the sudden urge visit, which in the several hours I’m in the air manages to radicalise me.

I then visit their sister site which tells me how to make an incendiary device on a plane using only the sick bag, my own farts and static electricity.

Boom, no more plane.

Think of the children for once, please!

mermaldad (profile) says:

No. 13

I think the commenter in #13 is stretching credulity by suggesting that he might get a sudden urge to visit, but here’s a little more believable scenario (tongue in cheek, of course):

Then I am merrily flying along when I get the sudden urge to visit, where I am exposed to all manner of radical ideas. I get so worked up I decide to take down the plane. I learn on the *same website* that I can make weapons out of a CD and a Coke can. Suddenly, I’m in command of the plane, flying into a building.

Terrorist says:

WiFi detonator? Meh. Altitude detonator? Meh, too complicated. Simple timing detonator. Yes! Me pick long flight.

But I will position explosive next to sales jerk, who insists on talking on Skype, or the lonely housewife who insists on babeling to her sister about her loser husband or the teenager who watches rick rolled vides on YouTube. Down with the infidels.

Andrew Yu-Jen Wang says:

Speaking of terrorism:

George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

Many people know what Bush did.

And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memory so it never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off of the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...