http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/computer-software/459634-1.html

I remember this story when I was growing up. This company was a mile away from my parent’s house. The “tip” allegedly came from a disgruntled employee. I knew a few folks who worked there and the story they told was that UE kept the original install disks for their software in a storage area that was well known to employees. The employees treated it like they treat the Office Supply cabinet.
The local papers treated it as though UE was buying one copy of an application and installing it everywhere, but I had some friends who worked there. The story they told(and you only have my word to go off of, so don’t trust it) was that employees were taking disks home with them and installing these applications for their personal use. The company didn’t approve of this but didn’t do much to prevent it (in 1994? … in the auto industry? They had no IT department and the owners probably didn’t know what piracy was … they didn’t own a boat).

The issue is that in a “down economy” any company is a potential target of a recently laid off employee. EULAs are so complex and it’s so difficult to manage pseudo-property that the choice becomes: Pay a bunch of lawyers and programmers to build a custom system to manage licenses, or just buy a new license every time the software is installed.

Then mix in the typical corporate purchasing policy and you end up with this:
– Every license we purchase, we include Upgrade Maintenance for 3 years, meaning we are legally allowed to upgrade to whatever version is available up to three years after we have purchased the original version (this is about 1.5 to 2 times the cost of the regular license)
– Upgrade maintenance is great as long as your staff knows it’s available and your staff numbers never change. Unfortunately, staff and purchasing managers don’t understand maintenance agreements so a new purchase every time a new version is released … with the same maintenance agreement. Top that off with the fact that when an employee leaves, most companies treat it as though the licenses left with them. No attempts are made to reclaim those licenses.

The company I work for went from 13,000 (peak) to 3,000 at its worst, but our purchasing behavior never changed.
Nobody “reclaimed” those licenses like we reclaimed the monitors and computers that we collected.

At worst we’ve purchased 16,000 licenses for a given application that about 5,000 are using (current headcount). We do everything possible to prevent anything resembling the appearance of piracy despite the fact that we could probably employ several hundred more folks if not for over-purchasing software licenses.
I’m going to go out on a limb, but I’ll bet that the BSA doesn’t offset their “piracy” numbers against the number of licenses that companies like mine over-purchase.

And yes, we’ve looked at several “license management” applications. None of these applications provides the intelligence needed to manage several hundred variants of EULA terms without hiring a team of lawyers to verify that we’re clear in every variant. And the consequences for screwing it up are exceptional. We’ve been audited by a few vendors and came out on top after months of wasted man-hours. That clause that says the software vendor will reimburse you if you’re complaint is a fantasy. In a large shop, they’ll find a PC with a cracked version of “something” under the BSA umbrella. Forget that you’ve purchased a few thousand more licenses than are needed, reverse engineering is a violation of the EULA. Put that in front of a jury of 12 non-technical folks and now you’ve wasted money on the audit and the litigation.

Really – but what type of person does this ?

It’s not like they are doing this for the betterment of society, stopping an egregious crime, or ….. whatever

It is because they are sick. These people need professioanl help and they will not seek it out on their own. So, if you meet one of these types, it is your duty to inform them that they should seek professioanl help.