Behavioral Advertisers Try To Come Up With Code Of Conduct Before FTC Writes One For Them

from the self-regulation dept

While the US Congress came down hard on NebuAd for its “behavioral targeting” ad program that would be used by ISPs to track everywhere you surfed and toss up relevant ads based on overall surfing activity, the FTC was a lot more hands-off. Instead, it simply suggested that the industry figure out a way to self-regulate before the FTC felt the need to step in. So, of course, they’re now trying to work out guidelines for behavioral advertising. While I tend to be against putting in place gov’t regulation where there’s no evidence that it’s necessary, I always find industries claiming that they’ll “self-regulate” amusing. It’s hard to see them coming up with guidelines that will satisfy people who believe their privacy is being violated. About the only way to do that would be to make such a service entirely opt-in — and that seems unlikely (at best).

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Behavioral Advertisers Try To Come Up With Code Of Conduct Before FTC Writes One For Them”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Jon says:

Another option

Opt-in is the sort of solution that only comes about when there’s massive, massive public outcry (or some kind of huge scandal). Even telemarketing has finagled an opt-out system.

The only solution I can think of would be for marketing organizations to pay ISPs to store and maintain each of their users’ compressed search history, with an online method available for a user to wipe their current history or to opt-out entirely. The ISP would request particular ads from marketing companies and pass those ads along to their users, but the marketers would not be able to discern which of the ISP’s customers the ads were for. This would provide a shield between marketers and users, and customers would have some recourse if they felt their rights were being infringed.

AD NY (user link) says:

Behavioral targeting is ingenious idea

Behavioral targeting is in fact an ingenious idea.

It serves both the prospective consumers and the Advertisers with more potentially refined and relevant output.

Looking at the history of 20th century advertising ….

….you can see we are entering a new era with the Web. We are not just searching for brilliant campaigns for the masses; we are fine tuning our efforts to serve both the small, medium to large clients with the most ROI for their dollars

gene_cavanaugh (user link) says:

Regulators and the market

Great! Presenting both sides of the question!
I am well aware that “pegging” on one side of an issue will promote readership – people don’t have to think, they just react emotionally.
Long term, though, one comes to the realization that there are two sides to nearly ANY controversy, and “why didn’t I get both sides?” becomes an issue – and another obsolete business method bites the dust!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...