LA Times Just Realized That Print And Online Newsrooms Should Be The Same?

from the a-bit-slow-on-the-uptake,-huh? dept

Nearly three years ago, we were surprised to hear the NY Times proudly announce that it was going to merge its online and offline newsrooms. What we couldn’t believe was that in 2005 a newspaper actually still had thought it made sense to treat the two separately. However, apparently the Times was way ahead of some other newspapers. Buried in the ho-hum news about massive LA Times layoffs is the news that, as part of this reorganization, it’s finally going to merge its web and print operations as well. When you’re sitting around wondering where newspapers went wrong, the fact that they wanted to keep web and print operations separate is probably a good place to start.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: la times, tribune company

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “LA Times Just Realized That Print And Online Newsrooms Should Be The Same?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
necknemlh (user link) says:

Re: It's just a passing fad, you know

It just may be that the internet, like a virus, will create a society too weak to defend itself from threat of internal collapse. As products of a technopolized society, we lose the process of thinking and memory. Our libraries, containing better information than we are able to access on the Internet, will grow obsolete and with that the wisdom that could see us through an age of mistaken priority.
We leave an age of wisdom and enter a world of “information” where one man’s information is as good as another. All of the facile tricks leave us to believe we are at ease in Zion.

Cindy Cotter says:

Re: Re: It's just a passing fad, you know

“It just may be that the internet, like a virus, will create a society too weak to defend itself from threat of internal collapse. As products of a technopolized society, we lose the process of thinking and memory.”

I’m old enough to have lived much of my adult life without the internet. With is way better. Really. The internet doesn’t disable people, it opens worlds. I find books I would never have heard of otherwise, and I can buy them online easily. I have diagnosed health problems that doctor’s missed, and have caught problems with prescribed medicines. When I wanted to homeschool, I read the education laws myself and didn’t need to rely on the local public school authorities who were either ignorant or antagonistic and routinely misinformed people about their rights. I have connected with people all over the world whom I would never otherwise have met.

I trust my own experience with the internet more than speculation and theory, and my experience tells me I have been strengthened, not weakened, by “technopolization.”

anne (profile) says:

The Los Angeles Times didn’t lose the war for readers because of their website presence. The Times lost the battle in 2000 when the Chandler family sold their controlling interest in the paper to the Tribune company of – ta da – Chicago.

Immediately, the focus of front page, left-hand column news stories switched from in-depth local interest to – Midwest, East Coast and after a time, irrelevant international stories. They meant nothing to me. I don’t want to read about the struggle for economic survival in Detroit, on an in-depth first-person level. Those stories should have remained with a Los Angeles focus. As a former Times subscriber, I speak from personal experience.

After a while, the web changed my news reading habits. I now have a Google home page customized for my interests – Time Mag, Newsweek, CBC, BBC and CNN, Techdirt, as well as some local Canadian newspaper websites. I have no reason to ever subscribe to a paper newspaper, ever again in my life.

There was another simpler change that caused me to stop buying the Times at the newsstand, after I had cancelled my subscription. The news rack price doubled to 50 cents. When the price was still a quarter, I had the habit of grabbing a Times and reading it while I ate a meal in a restaurant. At 50 cents, which I certainly could still afford, it just wasn’t worth digging in my pocket for the extra quarter to buy a newspaper. Instead, I’d read the one left behind by other diners.

Now I scope out the news headlines on my wi-fi Smart Phone while I’m eating in a restaurant. My hands never get dirty with newsprint. Ultimately, these are not battles that the Times is positioned to win. They have lost the hearts and loyalty of former subscribers and paying customers.

anne (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

If the comment was directed at me, that’s fine, but I have always been extremely interested and knowledgeable about local, national and international events, trends and what regular people are living through at any given point in time.

My point about the woes of Detroit was simple – those intensive, and important stories, are fine for national news magazines, but after the LA Times became a Chicago tribune property, the paper completely abandoned their rich and award-winning history of in-depth local stories, about our our own local residents and communities.

That was why I quit subscribing to the LA Times. I didn’t mean to imply that the suffering of Detroit residents wasn’t important, just that the primary news focus of a local newspaper should be the community it serves.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...