Hide Techdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

What Made Beacon A Bust?

from the too-big-to-make-it-work dept

There's no question that Facebook's Beacon initiative has taken a beating over the past few weeks. The feature automatically collected and published users' activities at partner sites, and almost immediately attracted criticism. MoveOn launched a campaign in opposition to Beacon. Horror stories of accidentally disclosed purchases — like engagement ring purchases and Christmas presents — began to circulate. The early word was decidedly negative, prompting some partners to begin to jump ship. Facebook has weathered similar storms before: its minifeed feature was met with a hostile reception, but is now emulated by virtually every new social network. But this time they caved: on Wednesday founder Mark Zuckerberg wrote a rather contrite blog post:

We've made a lot of mistakes building this feature, but we've made even more with how we've handled them. We simply did a bad job with this release, and I apologize for it.

Last week we changed Beacon to be an opt-in system, and today we're releasing a privacy control to turn off Beacon completely.

It remains to be seen whether users will opt out en masse — there are indications that many may still not be aware of Beacon. But the negative press seems likely to scare away potential partners. So while it would be premature to declare Beacon a failure, it seems very unlikely that it will ever achieve its intended net-spanning potential.

I think there are three reasons why this happened. First, Beacon's simply not a feature that people — as opposed to companies — were clamoring for. Facebook noticed its users expressing opinions about products and saw a great opportunity to make money. But they couldn't resist removing the messily inefficient human portion of the opinion-expression process. Unfortunately, users didn't get much value from having that process automated.

Second, and perhaps most obviously, Facebook bungled the deployment of the feature. As Zuckerberg admits in the above-linked post, the company didn't think hard enough about how users would respond, and was too slow to react to how they did.

But the third factor may be the most problematic for Facebook: they're just too big. I don't mean to call MoveOn's anti-Beacon campaign dishonest, but it's not exactly in keeping with the organization's style. It's hard to imagine they'd have undertaken the effort if there wasn't plenty of free press attention to be had by attacking Facebook. The social network has achieved a level of popular attention that makes them an attractive target (and, if you subscribe to the nightclub theory of social networking, one that could presage a no-one-goes-there-because-it's-too-crowded problem).

Of course it would be silly to spend too much time doomsaying — the site's pageviews continue to grow at a healthy clip. But in the wake of the partial collapse of Beacon, it's hard to imagine Facebook launching another initiative as ambitious — and it's even harder to imagine them launching one successfully.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: facebook

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “What Made Beacon A Bust?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Erik (profile) says:

Facebook doesn’t care about user privacy, they care about monetizing their user base to cash in (regardless of what PC-speaking Zuckerberg has to say to the contrary). There are established ways to add advertising revenue to a site, Facebook should look to those before ever considering something as stupid and invasive as Beacon again. But it doesn’t matter to me as I’d never use Facebook anyway, read their Terms of Use sometime. The rights you sign over by using the site are outrageous.

matt says:

how about opt in

People seem to forget, they will take opt-ins when available

but opt-outs haven’t been welcome since day one and never will be, ever. I found out I had been signed for beacon and I couldn’t even find the unsubscribe for quote some time.

Why should I have to hunt for this crap? Why doesn’t facebook do something interesting (like tshirts) that might be worth us spending money on them instead of bullshit (like forced advertising basically).

It’s not that peoeple don’t have a voice, but they would have ignored and done beacon anyway if they felt that not enough people cared (even though most people don’t even know WHERE to be vocal).

Anonymous Coward says:

isn’t this system basically what double click tried to do?

not 100% the same mechanism but exactly the same goal, i.e. tracking people and using that data for adverts.

except here they use your data to sell to other people.

the twist being *you* can use adblock all you like, but they still promote stuff to others.

one of these days people will learn, if adverts annoy they don’t work as well as ones that don’t

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...