Dell Sues Cybersquatters For Elaborate Shell Game

from the dept

Hearing stories about cybersquatters taking domains that are confusingly similar to corporate names is nothing new, but a new lawsuit from Dell shows just how far some firms are taking the practice. Dell has sued a group of registrars claiming that they’re really a series of shell companies designed to sit on various squatted domains for free. It’s no secret that a common practice among domain squatters is to register a domain and put ads on it for a few days to see if it drives any revenue — and if it doesn’t to return the domain within the grace period. We had always heard of this practice as being called “domain kiting,” but Dell refers to it (more aptly) as “domain tasting” in its lawsuit. However, what’s interesting here is that they’re accusing one company of setting up a long series of shell corporations to keep registering the same domain name over and over again — getting the benefit of the traffic without ever having to pay for the domain name. For example, Dell notes that one company registered “” and used it for 5 days (the limit you can go without paying) before abandoning it. However, as soon as it was abandoned, another firm picked up, used it for 5 days and then abandoned it again, only to see another firm immediately pick it up. Basically, they trace a pretty compelling pattern to suggest that this was a coordinated effort, potentially by a single company.

The other interesting part about the lawsuit is that rather than focusing on standard laws having to do with cybersquatting, Dell has gone a step further and is claiming that registering domain names with the Dell name in them is akin to “counterfeiting.” That seems like quite a stretch — and even the legal expert quoted in the article seems to think it’s a long shot for Dell to make that argument. If they win on this argument, then it could spell a lot of trouble for people who happen to own domain names that are similar to the names of large corporations. For many years, we’ve covered the fight between Nissan (the automaker) and Uzi Nissan, the guy who owns (this story is getting some more attention this week, thanks to a Freakonomics post, but the story itself has dragged on for years). Presumably, if Dell wins their case, then Nissan could turn around and accuse of “counterfeiting” and have a pretty strong precedent to back it up.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: dell

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Dell Sues Cybersquatters For Elaborate Shell Game”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Lawrence D'Oliveiro says:

Trademarks enough

Surely it would be sufficient to nail the cybersquatters on trademark infringement grounds alone–names like “dellfinancialservices” pretty clearly look like they were trying to pass themselves off as somehow connected to Dell. They shouldn’t need to make the further argument that any name with “dell” in it is automatically verboten.

Mojo says:

You know GrammarMan, I am a big grammar nazi myself, but you doing it in public like this makes you a big, giant, capital A-Hole. I am sickened by your self serving posts that do little more than prove you’re an insecure loser, only able to take joy in the mistakes of others.

If you’re really interested in helping, proof read articles and send private email to the writers. The way you’re doing it begs for severe bodily injury if someone were to discover your identity.

Given the mindset of people who read Techdirt, seems like the right people for the job are already here.

GrammarMan says:

Re: Re:

I may be an insecure loser (and absolutely am a “big, giant, capital A-Hole”), but my posts aren’t self-serving. In fact, they’re community-serving and I believe Mike appreciates the feedback. But perhaps private correspondence with the authors is a better approach. You’re feedback is appreciated. Farewell from GrammarMan… says:

Re: Re: Grammar

> But perhaps private correspondence with the
> authors is a better approach. You’re feedback
> is appreciated.

Also, a bit of helpful advice: if you’re going to call yourself “GrammarMan” and spend your time correcting the linguistic mistakes of others, you might want to suss out the difference between “you’re” and “your” before making yourself look like such a public fool.

GrammarMan says:

Re: Re: Re: Grammar

Your right! Their must be something the matter with me. I’ve been negatively effected by my haste. Its not my fault because I ain’t never done nothing wrong!

Seriously though, you’re right. We all make mistakes, even the best of us, as Mike would probably agree 😉 I’m done with the off-topic spam. My apologies…

linuxamp says:

This is where juries are necessary. Black and white laws, while easy to interpret can sometimes have adverse effects. In the case of Nissan, this guy had a company for quite some time, his name is Nissan, and he’s using the site for business. It seems that a jury should be able to distinguish this from counterfeiting.

On the other hand, would it mean that sites that use a misspelling of a name which are obviously counterfeit sites be protected against this?

And lastly what about names that are not company names but sound like a product that a company may produce?

BTR1701 (profile) says:


> Presumably, if Dell wins their case, then
> Nissan could turn around and accuse
> of “counterfeiting” and have a pretty strong
> precedent to back it up.

Well, not really, since the entire essence of the counterfeiting issue doesn’t apply in the Nissan case. Dell is claiming that people who have nothing to do with Dell are using their name to “counterfeit” an ad business.

In the Nissan case, the guy’s name is actually Uzi Nissan and he has a long-established legitimate business under that name that pre-dates the incorporation of Nissan Motors, so he’s not counterfeiting anything. He’s using his own legitimate name. The fact that his name is the same as an auto maufacturer doesn’t mean he’s engaged in counterfeiting. If anything, the “counterfeit” argument would be a weaker argument for Nissan Motors to use than standard trademark infringement in their case.

JohnOpincar (user link) says:

Last Paragraph Is Way Off

Why the last paragraph was included in this story is a true mystery. There’s a huge difference between domain squatting using a name and a mispelled word to intentionally mislead people (the Dell case) and a real person that happens to have the same name as a company (the Nissan case). Did the author stay up to late last night? Were they drinking?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...