Perhaps Up North 'Unlimited' Means Something Different Than It Does Here

from the haven't-we-been-through-this-before dept

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with a connectivity provider limiting how people use their connectivity — as long as it’s clearly laid out in how they pitch the service. Unfortunately, too many of these services advertise “unlimited” service, but mean the exact opposite. In the US, Verizon Wireless used to do this. When confronted on it, they tried to doubletalk their way around the issue, claiming that it was “unlimited data for limited types of data” (read that phrase a few times). However, eventually, Verizon Wireless realized how ridiculous this was and started to back off the claims of unlimited data. Unfortunately, that sort of thinking hasn’t reached the folks at Bell Canada, who are apparently advertising an unlimited service, while hiding an awful lot of “limits” within the terms of service. Again, there’s nothing wrong with them deciding they need to limit the service — but if they’re going to do so, they shouldn’t be advertising it as unlimited. It’s amazing that no one’s been charged with false advertising for these types of misleading ads.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: bell canada

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Perhaps Up North 'Unlimited' Means Something Different Than It Does Here”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ECA (profile) says:


I believe the word FREE, and Unlimited need to have a LEGAL definition..
I get tired of FREE ‘IF’

Once these 2 words are USED, nothing more should need to be done. And 90% of this FREE and Unlimited, is CRAP. Some $0.50 pen, or a service you dont want or need.
EVEN my Credit card has a service. I get it free, but am billed for it, after 30 days…DUH…
But its funny on my credit card…as the companies that CALL me Using the “credit card name” are another company, that PAYS to use the name, and are NOT affiliated.

Ken says:

not really news...

This is quite common, even in the US. Sprint still has a cap on it’s wireless “unlimited data”. Additionally, I don’t know of any cable ISP’s that don’t have a cap… mine is set at 50gb/month. 50gb/month isn’t advertised or even mentioned in the TOS, or even when you go over the limit… rather, you just receive a letter stating that you should be using less bandwidth than you are or your service will be terminated.

Somebody really should sue these bastards to advertise their limits.

tc1uscg says:

Re: not really news...

That’s not true. There is no cap. I have a data plan. Am on the road a lot and use what amounts to thousands of minutes online. Sending email, downloading blue prints, etc. I’ve never been advised by Sprint I’m using my “unlimited” plan too much. My plan is 60 bucks a month. I uploaded a file 2 days ago that was 1.8 gigabytes. The day before that, I downloaded a set of files that totaled 1.4gb (thank go for rev A). So, you might want to have you plan checked to ensure you just don’t have a “access” plan vs data plan.

Anonymous Coward says:

you just receive a letter stating that you should be using less bandwidth than you are or your service will be terminated.

lucky bell canada and videotron (the other major ISP in quebec)

they give you a limit and once you go over they charge you 8c an extra Mb there is an additional catch here cause they charge you by chunks of 100 Mb’s.

you do the math.

Shaun says:

Allready fixed in Australia

Here the plans always specify the speed of the connection which I gather is different in the US as well though they never quite get there with the quality of the lines – it’s actually only about 80% of the advertised speedwhere I live. Most plans have a set download limit but it used to be that some providers – like the monopoly provider Telstra – provided “unlimited” plans that were actually shaped – they were slowed to 64k after the download limit was reached. The ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) looked into this practice and warned the ISP’s to stop which they did and now everyone advertised their download limit – or the few that actually do that they have unlimited plans.

The ACCC also has ensured that we have some limited competition by ensuring that Telstra resells wholesale for a reasonable price and allows access for competitors to their exchanges. Telstra of course claims that the wholesale rates are below cost but despite this the are one of the most profitable telcos in the world. It looks like they calculate costs as if they built the infrastructure yesterday rather than with public money when they were publicly owned and so long ago that the payback period is long past – especially as they barely maintain the lines. Someone once had a line hanging over a fence post and a tree branch for 6 months by the time the story got into the local paper.

Anonymous Coward says:

I used to have a dial-up connection that was “unlimited” once a month Mindspring sent a email asking if I had considered starting my own ISP as I had used more then 700 hours online.

We had hooked 4 modems in SLI and had wired the block so everyone was connected with a true failover and we were getting 220000 bps not bad for Dial-up so I guess we sort of had set up our own ISP just not for profit.

Anonymous Coward says:

I used to have a dial-up connection that was “unlimited” once a month Mindspring sent a email asking if I had considered starting my own ISP as I had used more then 700 hours online.

We had hooked 4 modems in SLI and had wired the block so everyone was connected with a true failover and we were getting 220000 bps not bad for Dial-up so I guess we sort of had set up our own ISP just not for profit.

Dom says:

Things have been like that here in the UK for ages. Just about every single ISP here claims “unlimited” bandwidth packages, but in actual fact, they all have limits in their “Fair Use” policy.

A petition to the government was set up, and they did actually look into it, but came to the conclusion that it was OK for ISP’s to say “unlimited” when it actually wasn’t. Figure that one out.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: Re:

One positive about the “unlimited” plans that are not actually unlimited. I have a Verizon contract for another 10 months. Unlimited data. If I want to switch, I can just download about 10 half hour shows to my phone, hit their limits and have my contract cancelled. No early termination fees.

Actually, apparently Verizon *does* charge you the ETF if you go over their bandwidth limit…

Me says:

false advertising

The is no such ‘false advertising’ law in Canada.
false advertising tends to lead to bad press which tends to keep people in line.
After all if I have a cafe and claim I have the best pie in Canada who is to say that is indeed false advertising? (the law indicates word ‘best’ not mean better than everyone else it just means that mine would be as good as another person who says there is the best.)

Jim says:

How about Broadband

False advertising and Spin surrounds what the CellCo are doing with the term Broadband when all they offer is what we call Narrowband data services if one is lucky in any congested market. Narrowband in this case is around 512Kbps. while most new services offer 2Mbps and above consistently and with WiFi they can get a symmetrical 2Mbps -10Mbps.

Avatar28 says:

doesn't seem THAT bad

You shall not use or allow others to use the Service or your Device if such use:

* consumes excessive network capacity in Bell’s reasonable opinion, or causes our network, or our ability to provide services to others, to be adversely affected;

Okay, this seems reasonable. Seems to be saying that if you’re sucking down so much bandwidth you’re screwing up their network they’ll cut you off. I daresay EVERY ISP has that clause and I can deal with that.

* is for multi-media streaming, voice over Internet protocol or any other application which uses excessive network capacity that is not made available to you by Bell;

This seems like it could be some wiggle room for a lawsuit here. The way it’s written it could be interpreted as “any other application which uses excessive (network capacity that is not made available to you by Bell).” I.e. as long as it uses network capacity that they make available to you it’s okay. Tsk tsk. I’m disappointed that their lawyers would let something like that slide. Granted I’m sure that’s NOT what they mean, but the way it’s written is loose enough to be interpreted that way.

* is to operate an email, web, news, chat or other service.

Depends on what they mean by operate but I believe this is just a prohibition against running a server. You’re not really operating the service if you’re just using it and if you couldn’t use web or email services then a data plan wouldn’t really be very much use would it? (i.e. I use Techdirt, I don’t operate it).

MythEdge says:

No Limits

As far as I know, being in the phone industry for 8yrs is that Verizon still has a limit and Sprint has no cap. And if Sprint does have a cap, it has to be over 500 GIGS. My boss has an aircard, unlim plan and a kyocera router for his aircard to pump it out wireless through the house. His “friend” works out of the house remotely 6 days a week for around 8hrs a day, her kid is on the comp and xbox 360 7 days a week and he uses the net to DL video / music ALL DAY LONG. (Its set to DL stuff while he is here at work with me …) he showed me his last bill, $59.99 + Tax for services using almost 400 GIGS of information avg the last 4 months. I’m also surprised Verizon hasn’t been sued, I believe their limit is 40gigs. OR if they catch you DL’ing movies / music you get tos’d out.

If your lookin to break a contract, pull up a service map and find a nice fat hole in their service. Tell them your moving to the area shortly and you won’t have service. Usually they will break it if your nice about it …g’luck.

Steve says:

Bell at it again

About 4 or 5 years ago, they all of a sudden slapped a 5 gig/month DL limit on high speed internet accounts. Accounts that had been sold as “Unlimited” were now limited to 5 gig, with a “nominal” surcharge per GB after that. Nominal being 4.99/gig. It lasted barely 2 months because thier old install user base raped them in court. The telcos will never learn will they?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...