RIAA Gets Legislators To Threaten To Drop 'The Hammer' On Colleges and Universities

from the enough-already dept

The RIAA has been on a renewed push to target file-sharing college students lately, trying to push them into “discounted settlements” so the RIAA doesn’t have to go to the trouble of actually suing them in court, where its claims might have to face some scrutiny. Yesterday, it went up to Capitol Hill to whine that colleges and universities aren’t doing enough to stop piracy. They also got some legislators, like Hollywood’s rep, Howard Berman, to make some veiled threats to the schools, such as saying that “current law isn’t giving universities enough incentive to comply,” or say that Congress might seek to make schools liable for their students’ illegal downloading. One of our favorite people, RIAA president Cary Sherman, complained that the schools aren’t doing enough to enforce the law — but last time we checked, that wasn’t their responsibility, and neither is helping the RIAA prop up its members’ outdated business model. Just because the RIAA has been able to get some law enforcement groups to act at its behest, or because it’s put together its own private police force, that doesn’t mean it gets to decide who has the responsibility to enforce copyright law. The RIAA continually tries to sidestep the legal process and keep its lawsuits — and shaky legal arguments — out of the courtroom and away from scrutiny. When that doesn’t work, they follow their campaign contributions to Washington, and try to get legislators to change the law. Plenty of protection and legal recourse already exists for the RIAA and any other group who thinks its copyrights are being infringed. The problem isn’t that colleges and universities aren’t doing their part (because they have no part to play), but simply that the RIAA wants to shortcut the legal process and make the relevant laws suit its agenda above anything else.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “RIAA Gets Legislators To Threaten To Drop 'The Hammer' On Colleges and Universities”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
25 Comments
Sanguine Dream says:

What!?!

The RIAA is sounding a lot like the Catholic Church of about 700 years ago. How is it that the entertainment industry is able to use the police as its own enforcers, pay for custom made laws, and tell colleges that they need to tighten up on file sharing?

In a lawuit isn’t it the burden of the entity suing to acutally prove that they have been wronged? Well the RIAA has managed to flip the scirpt and is now taking people to court and instead of the RIAA proving that 70 yr old grandparent guilty that 70 yr old grandpartent basically has to give up half their pension for fear of losing all of it trying to fight back.

The RIAA is using the strategy of going after those that are unlikely to have the funds and/or knowledge to fight back in order to set precedence. Once that is done they will start going after larger targets. After that they will try to bully the electronics industry into only releasing devices pending RIAA approval (i.e. make sure there is no way consumers can use said device in any way that the RIAA does not like).

charlie potatoes (profile) says:

simple problem..simple solution

i dont listen to music. i couldnt care less what happens…but..why does no one call for a boycott? a simple 30 moratorium on the purchase of any new music…can’t you guys go for a month listening to the old stuff? i suspect you might get their attention…it would cost them millions, i supect. hit the assholes in their fat wallets…

Casper says:

They are going to get burned...

They are treading in some hazardous territory. I don’t think they realize that they are not all powerful.

Right now their methods are to attack lots of little groups and push individuals around, that works, individuals don’t have the resources, support, or knowledge to fight back. Now, however, they are reaching out against large groups of somewhat intelligent people. Pushing around computer illiterate parents is one thing, but they are going to start running into law and computer science types who know their rights and know who to turn to for help.

Chris says:

This is where it can all hit the fan.

If the RIAA seriously tries to go against universities, places where people actualy happen to know things, I can only pray that the admisitration will will hit the RIAA with the biggest backlash in recent history. If they’re able to get away with it, then I can’t ever respect any institution that coperates with this company. The RIAA is a company, nothing more, it’s not a government agency, it has no authority other than to take people to court who violate current laws that protect their product. If these “Accredited” universities and colleges aren’t smart enough to see that the fundamental nature of law itself is being raped to the fullest extent so these jackasses can squeeze another cent out of anyone they can, then some extremist is probably going to take matters into their own hands. Lord knows if I was sued for so much that I had to drop out of college just to pay some BS fine, I would go to any extent to make sure that whoever was involved with the RIAA would face an equally frustrating turn of events. Grassroot boycotting against facist corporate agendas is what needs to be the focal point of all debate, not just randomly commenting our greivences.

Sanguine Dream says:

Class action suit

Personally I’d like to see all the people and small companies that were forced into oblivion to band together and sue the RIAA in a massive class action suit. There has to be something wrong with bullying people into quitting college, losing their pension/retirement, and basically paying out the wazoo.

I know that ethics != law but this is out of hand.

Buzz (profile) says:

Eh?

Does the RIAA have the right to probe file-sharing networks on universities? The RIAA is not the government! I don’t know the exact law on this issue, but I don’t think the RIAA is allowed to snoop around like that.

For the record, I too am one of the few who rarely listens to or buys music. Granted, I have a small collection (‘small’ meaning almost all my CDs were gifts).

Adam says:

Yeah, like many people pointed out already: the **AA is a fucking company, why are they allowed to do this? Answer: because we live in in a country that is owned and run by corporations where laws, constitution and rights mean shit when corporate bottom line is considered versus the welfare of citizens. And this cancer is spreading to other parts of the world…

Jonathan Olsen says:

Fuck the RIAA

Was it Kng Henry VIII who said “first we kill all the lawyers”? I can understand why.

It’s a simplly a matter of “follow the dollars”. This is a money making machine for lawyers. They can promise the world to the RIAA and deliver the easy targets one at a time. It is rememinicenst of the early days of hacking, a few victims made an example of. Punshment DID NOT fit the crime.

MESSAGE TO THE MUSIC INDUSTRY: Fair is fair, supply us with a quality product that engages us in more ways than the music itself. I mean packaging, details about the artists, quality that exceeds anything that can be done in a download, extras that you can ensure can’t be copied and put on-line by pirates, spend the money that you would use to pay lawyers to bring your audience back using the age-old, certified, adertising “gimicks” of a quality product that engages the consumer, and is only available in that form from one source.

We don’t have any intersest in ripping any artists off!

We want something that keeps up with the changing quality, product style, marketing, etc,of the third millenium. (Marketing 101 2007) Maybe time to re-train your staff?

WAKE-UP RIAA!!!!! Get off the “we’re such tragic victims!” bandwaggon and understand your target demographic!!!

|333173|3|_||3 says:

@16

THe word is “hear”, not”here”. As in, listen to what he says.
If all unencrypted P2P is blocked, and encrypted traffic banned in the USA (only a matter of time, I bet you will need liscences to use encryption and have to supply the keys to the government), offshore Usenet posts may become popular. You could use VoIP to connect to a dial-up server overseas, and download from there. ASCII-buffring tools are still around, so that shouldn’t be a problem. You could even use a real ‘phne line if you could afford the ‘phone bill, by pretendign to be a fax machine sending a corrupted document, or a dial-up internet user.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...