This Isn't The New Business Model We Were Hoping The RIAA Would Adopt

from the how-nice-of-them dept

As was leaked earlier this month, the RIAA is now offering “discounted settlements” to those it accuses of file sharing, if they agree to pay up before the RIAA actually takes them to court. As we explained when this deal first came out, this is a total scam. The RIAA had tried to do this in the past, but given the flimsy evidence it has, the courts found that it made more sense to argue these cases in court, rather than by letting the RIAA pressure people into settling early. This is nothing short of extortion. It’s trying to scare people into paying up without giving them a real chance to defend themselves against what is usually very weak (and all too often, incorrect) evidence. Plenty of people probably will be scared into paying — but if this is the RIAA’s idea of a new business model, they’re simply asking for trouble. Of course, it’s no wonder that this comes out the same day that the RIAA announces it opposes Rep. Boucher’s FAIR USE bill. Expanding fair use (even though the bill is pretty weak) would only cut down on the number of people they could extort this way.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “This Isn't The New Business Model We Were Hoping The RIAA Would Adopt”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
misanthropic humanist says:

violence and response to violence

Calling it a “scam” is a little weak isn’t it. It is extorting money by menaces as plain as the nose on your face. I ‘ve learned my lesson here once today assuming I know American law by thinking it must be based in any kind of sanity, but here in Europe that is illegal. Do you not have laws against extortion?

Perhaps somebody more familiar with US law can comment, but wouldn’t sending one penny by registered mail amount to a settlement?

The problem seems to be that your civil and criminal justice systems are totally disjoint. On the one hand large organisations can use the threat of violence (if you don’t pay you will go to prison – ergo state sanctioned violence against the person) to intimidate and extort, but the individual does not have that power, in theory but not in practice.

Unfortunately the correct and moral solution to extortion, which is a robust self defence, is illegal in a civilised society. In the old days you’d just invite them to send round a representative to your home. Upon arrival decapitate them and send back the head and entrails in a large sack. This ensures you won’t be hearing from them in the future.

These days you need to be more thoughtful. Using the system against itself, would it not be possible for a group of, say 100, 000 American citizens to sue the MAFIAA, what do you call that, a “class action” ? Take them face on for 1 Trillion dollars for massive public intimidation and psychological harm or something?
Perhaps you could use the same approach on your government next time they blow up a building full of people to frighten you?

Just ideas.

Bolt-Thrower says:

Nice work, MH

“…the correct and moral solution to extortion …is a robust self defence,…”

I like that a lot. I may steal it for sigs on future board posts. I will credit Misanthropic Humanist fully if I do.
Which doesn’t really count as stealing, then does it? I will use that same defense if Lars Ulrich ever sends his sissy riaa lawyers after me for listening to napster versions of his songs. His old songs. The new stuff (Since the black album) is complete crap.

But I digress – MH, I seek your permission to quote you in future signatures – I ask because I respect and agree with what you have written. I wouldn’t give lars or the riaa the same courtesy, however.

Boost says:


Well, I think the difference between the RIAA and organized crime is that the RIAA is maniupluating the legal system to make themselves some money. You see, the RIAA is no longer in the business of selling music to college students. I think we all know that college students spend the same amount or more on music now than they would if they coudln’t download music for free. The RIAA knows this too. So if they can’t make money by selling music to college students, they’ll make money by suing college students. It’s obviously lucrititve and a pretty good idea. It’s legal bullying. I mean, why invest money to make a product that people actually want to pay for, when you can just write a few letters and more or less take their lunch money…or in this case, beer money.

Anonymous Coward says:

so, knowing that if you format your harddrive after being served with a lawsuit the judge can find you guilty of destroying evidence, can you format your harddrive upon receipt of one of these letters since the lawsuit hasn’t been filed yet?

This sounds like a good move on th RIAA’s part…. give em some warning so that they can have a change of heart and destroy all the evid… I mean, um, all the evil pirated content and uninstall the evil P2P program.

just a thought

|333173|3|_||3 says:

Pay up

If you could find some little country where traditional money (like fruit or sea-shells) are legal tender, you could try paying the RIAA in forgien money. Then, if it was properly coordinated, tehy would ahve the problem of waht to do with tons if rotten frit or broken seashells.

A varuiation on this would be to write out cheques for $.01 on cabbage leaves. It would take a long time, but be worht it for getting on the news.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...