Because Without The Patent System No One Would Ever Think To Barter Online

from the well,-why-not? dept

Just yesterday we were discussing why societies tended to move away from bartering and to a monetary-based transaction system because it was more efficient. Specifically, we were discussing why the idea behind Peerflix and the multitude of other online bartering sites seem unlikely to become particularly compelling businesses. However, there was one other point, not covered in the original article on Peerflix’s move away from a strict barter site. It appears that the company is excited to start enforcing a patent it recently bought that covers method of exchanging goods over the internet. Effectively, the patent covers a computer-based bartering system. It takes the concept of bartering, puts it on a network, and voila, it’s suddenly patentable, despite thousands upon thousands of years of history concerning how barter systems work. The fact that there have been a ton of online bartering companies over the years apparently isn’t evidence enough that this is hardly a “non-obvious” idea. But, of course, now that Peerflix owns the patent, they might as well use it: “There would be no reason to own the patent unless we intended to flex our muscles around it,” claims the company’s CEO. Given the failure of the company’s original business model (similar to the failures of every other bartering-based business models) this looks like yet another case of failed companies falling back on patent lawsuits.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Because Without The Patent System No One Would Ever Think To Barter Online”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
PhysicsRockstarGuy says:


myspace is for egotistical losers. us d&d type are of a different breed all together. we’re far lower on the scale of pathetic, self-centered, egotistical, narcissistic, “there’s no life outside the high school mentality”-“you’re only as important as the superficial friends you have” person. 🙂

Sanguine Dream says:

Re: Re:

They’re gonna do the same thing that every other patent hoarder does. They will hold onto the patent until someone else gets it right…and then sue them into oblivion. And now that peerflix has the patent they think they no longer have to actually work on the system of bartering online. Why else would you move away from a method and the go back and patent it.

A warning to anyone working on a way to barter onlinne, Peerflix’s lawyers have their eyes and ears open and actively looking for anyone that starts anything close to an online bartering busness.

misanthropic humanist says:

Re: Re: Re:

“Peerflix’s lawyers have their eyes and ears open and actively looking for anyone that starts anything close to an online bartering busness.’

Given that it costs a few pennies to register a domain and 10 minutes to knock up a plausible website, doesn’t anybody see a way of scamming them? I mean, why get all ethical about it, the so called patent speaks for itself. 🙂

Having said that, it contains 51 parametric conditionals summarised in 7 flowcharts necessarily requiring a database of pre-existing members, an elaborate negotiation system and criteria matching procedure and only applies to books, DVDs, games and the like. It is suboptimal in two important respects and contains at least one error.

In short, it’s a crock, and anybody with an IQ in double figures could “invent” a better barter method.

What is cool is that it shows exactly how NOT to implement a working system since we know the company behind it failed, and not to employ Donna R. Moore to “invent” any software for you.

PhysicsGuy says:


interesting, point me to some of these egotistical posts. from what i recall most of my posts are about technical side rants from the article in question, the rest are like my first post here… i wasn’t aware i had any posts, aside from the few here and the times people make direct attacks towards me, that were directly about myself. in fact, i try to bring as little attention as i can towards myself and try to focus on knowledge and ideas (except when i’m being random, but then that isn’t about myself either). i could be wrong about this of course, so please, point me towards those egotistical posts.

it’s also interesting i made a friend… 🙂 bumbling old guy likes to call me ignorant but doesn’t like to provide proof of said ignorance (i’d almost think he was ignorant about the meaning of the word :x) 🙂

PhysicsGuy says:


interesting… i wasn’t aware that i was uninformed. sure, the myspace comments are opinion, but they’re certainly not uninformed as i have to deal with myspace users all the time while waiting for a computer to print out any exposition i might need to hand in which i couldn’t previously print. see… there’s this nifty place i go to actually study computer technologies, physics and math. it’s called college. i recommend it for yourself. it would do you wonders.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...