State Department Googles To Create Banned Iranians List

from the the-Google-spies dept

It appears our government intelligence agencies are still a bit confused about this whole internet thing. A few months ago, we noted that the FBI lost a lawsuit after a judge was shocked that FBI agents didn’t do a simple Google search in trying to figure out if someone was still alive. Then, last week, we noted that our intelligence agencies were starting to make use of the tools of social applications, but not necessarily the community of people out there. However, when the CIA turned down a State Department request for names of Iranians who deserve to be sanctioned for their work on Iran’s nuclear program, the State Department set up a junior employee to go about Googling things like “Iran and nuclear” to come up with a list. After some cutting down the list, the CIA eventually approved a small list of people, but it still seems bizarre to think that the best way to determine dangerous people is to do a simple Google search. That isn’t to say that the intelligence community shouldn’t be using tools like Google. Obviously, they should be using them quite a lot — but that doesn’t mean it’s right for everything: such as figuring out the best list of people to sanction over a clandestine nuclear weapons program.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “State Department Googles To Create Banned Iranians List”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: CIA can google

You comment would be amusing except for the fact that you can’t even spell military, and the word lets does NOT need an apostrophe. The word you made into a contraction is “let is”, now how intelligent is that? If I were a betting man, and I am. I would put every cent I have that anyone who works at the CIA, and yes I even mean the janitors, is more intelligent than you.

Louis says:

Re: Re: CIA can google by Grammar Fool.

You comment would be amusing except for the fact that you can’t even spell military, and the word lets does NOT need an apostrophe. The word you made into a contraction is “let is”, now how intelligent is that? If I were a betting man, and I am. I would put every cent I have that anyone who works at the CIA, and yes I even mean the janitors, is more intelligent than you.

Your comment is friggin’ hilarious considering your own seeming inadequate grasp of English grammar.

And I like the word “militairy” – it rhymes with “fairy”. Which would be a pretty good description of most men in the military. Haha. Bite me grammar man.

rick says:

Re: Re: Google is not bound to confidentiality?

…but how hard would it be for thier miami isp to sniff the traffic going in and out of the firewall IP address. This has always worried me about searches. I think an interesting product might be some sort of distributed anonymyzer network or, for a fee paid to google, direct vpn connections to them so no one could easedrop along the way.

Anonymous Coward says:

grammer nazis…grammer nazzis..

lolerskate, roflcopter,shitties…..

wow. everyone has bad grammar (the e above was intentional) whom should we blame? it’s he inet phase, and public education sucks….and in private schools, they are more worried about using a fountain pen (see one of yesterday’s articles)

so….wow….just…wow

Louis says:

Re: louis.....

Louis, as a former marine, and quite a straight one at that, I hope you die and rot in hell.

As a matter of fact, not to make idle threats, If I ever meet you in person, chances are I will kick your ass on base principle.

Thank you.

LOL! Man, I knew some closet homophobe would get upset about that fairy comment! And an ass kicking threat no less!

Mister Marine, if you and I meet, chances are you’d just embarass yourself and prematurely blow your load in your pants.

Vincent Clement says:

The Real Story

Wait a minute, I thought that one of the reasons for the creation of Homeland Security was to facilitate the exchange of information between various agencies. So, five years after 9/11 – which was partly blamed on the lack of data sharing between various agencies – we still have one agency initially refusing to share some data with another agency.

Unknowledgeable Geek says:

No. 15

You could not have said it any better.

Our government is so stupid and so it’s my way or the highway that they still have NATIONAL DEFENSE departments not talking to each other. WHAT the FFFFF. What is the major reason for the existence of government, to PROTECT not to job protect. This is ridiculous and better yet this occurs and all you idiots can do on this page is call or military personal fags and correct someones grammar.

You all need a reality check or 9/11/07 is right around the corner.

This is absouletly unacceptable.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...