VeriChip VeriEasy To Clone, Researchers Say

from the not-inspiring-much-confidence dept

For some time we’ve been following the colorful past of RFID maker VeriChip, a company that promotes implanting RFID chips in humans for identification purposes. As if the stated goal of the company wasn’t disturbing enough, it has a history of lying to regulators and to the public about the nature of its devices, and how they would be used. Now, two researchers, presenting at a hacker conference, have demonstrated that the company’s chips can easily be cloned, essentially allowing an individual to assume another’s identity. Not surprisingly, this stands in contradiction to VeriChip’s claim that their products are impossible to counterfeit. In fact, the researchers claim that the company’s chips have no security mechanism whatsoever. For its part, VeriChip has responded saying it hasn’t reviewed the evidence, and that it’s still easier to steal someone’s ID out of a wallet than it is to gain information from a chip in someone’s arm. That may be true, but when your wallet is stolen, you can realize it quickly and alert the relevant authorities. How do you know when someone’s passed by you with a wireless scanner? If fingerprint identification can be defeated with Play-Doh, and someone can clone your embedded identity chip without you knowing it, there’s something to be said for old-fashioned, disposable ID systems.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “VeriChip VeriEasy To Clone, Researchers Say”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Stephen says:

What's wrong with an "off" switch??

Why do all these companies refuse to just include an “off” switch?? Putting a chip in my arm may help with medical emergencies and all that, but why would I want it always on when I only need it like once a decade??

Same with credit cards. Why the fark do I need a card always looking out to try and buy something when I only buy something once or twice a day??

Let me turn the dang thing off and it’ll go a long way to making me want to actually use one of these things…

Mrs Fudd says:

Re: What's wrong with an "off" switch??

There might be some merit in relying on RFID for medical emergencies — unless you happen to be the good samaritan who comes to my rescue after I’ve been in any-number-of-situations that result in me needing CPR and mouth to mouth. Imagine how valuable it would be for you, the average citizen, to be the hero and perform mouth to mouth — but since you didn’t scan me first to discover that I’m severely allergic to what you just ate or handled at lunch, I die on the spot.

There’s something to be said for the low-tech devices like MedicAlert bracelets.

jsnbase says:

I'll need a little more than this

‘For its part, VeriChip has responded saying it hasn’t reviewed the evidence, and that it’s still easier to steal someone’s ID out of a wallet than it is to gain information from a chip in someone’s arm.’

If you’re going to implant something in my arm, I’m gonna need a bit more assurance than ‘it’s easier to grab your wallet.’ Something like: ‘it’s easier to castrate an angry female alligator than it is to gain information from the chip.’ Or maybe ‘it’s easier to unravel space-time.’

But easier than stealing a wallet? Come on, if I put my wallet in the wrong pocket it takes me three hours to find it.

Anonymous of Course says:

Baaa Baaa

My dog has a chip in its ear. It’s also a common

practice for livestock. Cattle, sheep and goats,

emu and pigs are “chipped.”

I know governments treat their population as

livestock and would like better asset management.

I’m simply not ready for a constant reminder, that

little bump just below the skin, just yet.

I never understimate the motivational power of

money. Given time most any scheme will be

subject to fraud. Can an identification system be

cost effective and acceptably fraud resistant?

Who decides the price point and the tolerable

level of risk?

I think this needs an ANSI standards comitte… or

something. Not people of dubious reputation and

their shady company driving the standard.

Bakken says:

It's not stealing if you don't get caught

I would imagine that hardest part about stealing someones wallet, would be to try and do so without them knowing. Now if I had a wireless scanner and I ran through a crowed of people with these RFIDs, I bet I could get everyones info without them even knowing. So which would be easier again?

Lay Person says:


Yup ,this is just another lame invention that will never fulfill all that it promises.

If it’s tangible, it can be replicated–end of story.

What we need are DNA scanners. All you do is muster up a big oyster and spit it out on to the scanner lens. The scanner verifies your DNA then, based on it’s reference, permits/denies entry.

tim stevens (profile) says:

Annalee Newitz (hot nerd girl with chip) and Jonathan Westhues (smart nerd guy with cloner) are just the types that VeriChip should fear. They have no agenda other than exposing the dishonesty and incompetence of VeriChip.

To quote Jonathan (see Johnathan’s analysis, “The Verichip is a repurposed dog tag; there is no reason (counterfeit housepets?) why it would have been designed with any security features, and in fact it was not.”

Of course when VeriChip responded saying “…it hasn’t reviewed the evidence…” it sounds just like the FTC and FCC when there is a massive loss of personal data (a la the recent Veterans data loss via laptop): “…there is no evidence to suggest that anyone’s persona data was compomised…” Wonderful. Either someone is too good to get caught or the responsible parties are too slow to know how to do anything about it.


Phillip Vector says:

Impossible to Counterfit

You know, I used to be in this game that was played in New York called “The Nexus”. We had our own currency that the maker of the game said was impossible to copy. A brief meeting with some fellow players and a trip to kinkos and we litterally printed our own money, flooded the market with the funny money (and kept the real money to ourselves) and announced that it was copied and how to spot it (we included a watermark with our money).

If you say something is impossible to a hacker, that just makes them want to prove you wrong.

... says:

people dont realive what there doing when the take this chip. they a denouncing jusus christ our lord and savior. the bible couldnt have been more clear in revelations when it said in one verse that no one will be able to but or sell with out the mark. the mark is the mark of the beast but no one realizes it now! it started when they put chips in aminals like your cats and dogs. they are trying to put chips in new born babies. then its going to try to get us, by saying it helps with the sucurity issues, and identity theif. and then there giong to want us to strart buying and selling using it. its all supposed to happen though. thats why you need to be saved and never accept that chip bacuse the cost is your eternal life in heave with jusus christ. so be for its to late you need to get right with god.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...