DOJ: Protecting Private Businesses From Changing Business Models

from the then-what? dept

The Department of Justice is mighty proud of itself today, after announcing that it’s met or exceeded many of the objectives set out for it by an “intellectual property task force” from 2004. It’s not clear from the article who exactly made up the task force, but it certainly sounds like it was industry insiders who were more focused on protecting a business model than those actually concerned about real intellectual property issues. Among the accomplishments by the DOJ since then includes placing special intellectual property prosecutors around the globe to help shut down certain websites, even if they’re perfectly legal in their home countries. Then there’s this odd accomplishment: “Increasing the number of defendants prosecuted for intellectual property offenses by 98 percent between the government’s fiscal 2004 and 2005 years.” That’s quite a strange benchmark from a task force, and suggests a “when you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail” approach — where increasing prosecution, without any look at other factors is considered a laudable goal. It certainly shows that the task force’s report wasn’t looking at how digital goods were changing business models, but about how to protect increasingly obsolete business models by sending their law enforcement lackeys after people. Of course, given these types of moves, it’s no surprise to see openly dishonest groups like the BSA talk about how the DOJ has made significant progress (which is laughable in its own right). Still, it’s unclear why private industries get to use the Justice Department as their own private police force to fight their battles against a changing marketplace.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ: Protecting Private Businesses From Changing Business Models”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Stu says:

private industries get to use the Justice Departme

It’s clear why the DOJ and the rest of the government is at the beck and call of big business – it’s money. Political contributions, golf trips on private jets, high paid “thank you” jobs when you leave “public service”. There’s no secret about it – just read the papers every day.

The difference between corruption in the USA and “third world” countries is that our corruption is at the higher levels of government. In third world countries, it is at all levels of society – paying a bribe just to get a phone installed, for instance. There is nothing stopping it from happening here.

The question is – what can we do about it? Not much, I fear. The best we can do is employ the “once and done” voting technique, which is – if they are in office vote them out.

haywood says:

Re: private industries get to use the Justice Depa

Government is always at the beck and call of business big and small. If you doubt that imagine the response you would get to the theft of a $5 item, now imagine the response if Walmart reported the same crime. I have a friend, a rancher who had well over $1000 of hay stolen from his field, the response to his reporting it was “what do you want us to do” again, imagine if the same had happened at a retail business. The government exists to protect business from us, not the other way around.

Robert Rittmuller (user link) says:

It's like an earthquake...

I have always likened the resistance to changing market conditions to the forces that build up in techtonic plates before an earthquake. If the pressure to move (change) is handled frequently and the plates adapt (companies adapt to change) then nobody suffers or gets hurt. However, if the plates (companies) resist the external forces, pressure builds and ultimately results in a period of rapid, and often violent change. Moral of the story: manage change, don’t resist it or you might find yourself dealing with an “earthquake”.

EverydayBS says:

It's not just the entertainment industry

It’s no surprise to me that the industry is trying to maintain it’s current business model. Historically speaking, most modern businesses resist change. It’s not usually in their best interest at the time. Why take a risk when what you are currently doing makes you successful? The bottom line is to make money. Not to be innovative. Big Business stifles innovation on purpose to maintain theor profit margins for their stockholders. Not until a little guy arrives and proves that it can be done a different way, will Corporate change occur. Afterwards. because they have all the money they can either buy out the actual innovator or copy it at little cost to them. All this posturing by the industry is just to keep profits high until another model is proven to them. Then they will embrace it and make it their own. This is an opportunity for us as the little guys to make a killing off of the Big Fish. Come up with something that works, patent it, and offer them just enough of the cut to keep them off your back. Or better yet, use the oppotunity to start your own industry and call the shots yourself. It can be done.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...