Will Striking Transit Workers Speed Up NYC Subway Automation?

from the people?--we-don't-need-no-stinkin'-people dept

As a fan of the NYC subway system it’s tough to imagine how the city is functioning with all their transit workers on strike. However, it’s leading some to ask the very reasonable question about what it would take to automate the subway system in New York. It’s not a new question. In fact, earlier this year, NYC Transit opened up one automated line and have suggested that over the next twenty years or so, they expect to automate the entire system. Automated systems aren’t that rare, as the articles note. Here in San Francisco, the BART system is apparently automated. The difficulty appears to be less in building an automated train system, but in retrofitting such a large, old and complex system as the massive NYC subway system. Still, after a day or two of no subways at all, it’s not difficult to see plenty of people scrambling for ways to speed up that conversion process.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Will Striking Transit Workers Speed Up NYC Subway Automation?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
David says:

Automated Trains

An important next step, after automating the trains, is to break them up. Instead of one 4 car train every 20 minutes, there should be 1 car trains every 5 minutes. Same capacity, same hardware cost, less waiting. My understanding is that the historical reason for multi-car trains is to keep piloting costs down.
They also need to look at providing automated mechanical barriers in the stations, and interlocking them with the trains, akin to elevator operations. Elevators have not been manned in decades, and have proven to be very safe and reliable. Think of subways as horizontal elevators.

Blbpaws says:

Re: Automated Trains

And when’s the last time you saw more than one elevator operating in the same shaft?

Your understanding is flawed; in order to prevent crashes–something that I, as a NYC subway commuter, are very happy they are doing–they don’t run one train right up against the back of the one in front of it, even during rush hour. In fact, when the trains get close, it’s common practice for the lagging train to slow down or completely stop in the tunnel to avert any possibility of a crash.

In addition, during rush hour, there are trains along the busy lines at a very fast rate–more than one every five minutes–and they still are packed. Using 1 car trains every five minutes would stall the city during rush hours and turn a half hour commute into a hour and a half ordeal.

grins says:

Re: Labor disputes will shut transit down, regardl

The people are rightfully complaining about their working conditions. If you give them a job without the stressful conditions, such as an environment with warm and clean air, where they’re simply monitoring train functionality remotely, there wouldnt be a people problem. It’s always a technical problem because better technology is usually the solution to having people work in crappy situations.

Murray Muffin ex NY'er in GA says:

Re: Labor disputes will shut transit down, regardl

If you got rid of the union labor and had automated trains (Hartsfeild airport in Atlanta has them -and they work very well) there would be no strikes. Only union eployees who think that they work for the union rather then their employer strike. They are very overpaid for a simple job. I guess years ago people thought elevators actually needed an operator….

eddy says:

I think they should always have operators and………it is stupid to call a train a horizontal elevator—if it is, then what isn’t?. Computers can take the job of almost everyone…….not just train operators. Secretaries- already happening, there are more, and now there are programs which actually DESIGN AND Produce a product based on a few requirements/parameters. However, if everything is regulated by computers, everything is “perfect”, what will be the point of life? Human error makes life what it is, and I don’t want to lose it. There is a bigger picture to this. Slowly all of the middle to lower class people will be jobless with the CEOs feeding paper to a computer. Maybe a bit far fetched, but unfortunately, I cannot disregard it as an outcome for workers, it seems possible to me. Truth: what is Sci-Fi now will only be so for a while; we make what we dream, and if super thinking robots have a profitable market, they WILL be made, I assure you.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...