Microsoft Gets Some More Bad News About Eolas

from the back-to-the-lower-courts-it-is dept

Coming just a month after the patent office decided that Eolas’ patent for plugins is valid, Microsoft can’t be all that happy to hear that the Supreme Court won’t review their appeal in the case that has them owing $500 million while also making browsers much less useful — for an idea that certainly seems fairly obvious (embedding one program into another). The battle still needs to be reviewed by the district court, but the latest few moves haven’t gone in Microsoft’s favor. Considering that Microsoft was hoping to use the various prior art arguments in the lower case, the USPTO’s findings last month may look particularly damaging. Again, it’s quite hard to see what Eolas has done that deserves them getting half a billion dollars.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Microsoft Gets Some More Bad News About Eolas”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Microsoft actually WANTS to lose this

Despite all its posturing, Microsoft actually wants this patent to be found valid, and here’s why:

It forces the browser to be a *single binary* rather than a container for plugins. That means Microsoft will get to dictate what they build into IE, and have a convenient excuse. Flash? Sorry. Java VM? Sorry.

It also provides a huge I.P. threat to Firefox and other browsers, by essentially trashing their ability to embed plugins as well.

The fact that cinema and backroom shinanigans can go on like this in the US without government intervention speaks to the corruption in our government at the moment. Sad!!

Riley says:

Re: Microsoft actually WANTS to lose this

Ridiculous doesn’t even begin to describe these patents.

While it is true that Microsoft could potentially benefit from an all out patent battle where the best lawyers controlled the software industry, I honestly don’t believe that they want to play the patent game. I never see them going after other companies for violating a patent, but I have no doubt that this will change. They are essentially being forced into the patent business and as a result, I fear things are only going to get worse in the future. Sadly, if MS would have started building an extensive patent library back in the 90s, they could probably be forcing most of their competitors out of business by now. And how will these patents affect open source initiatives?

malhombre says:

Re: Microsoft actually WANTS to lose this

In response to your last sentence, I think the time has come to find out more about our politicians views on the entire digital arena, not only abortion, religion in schools, drugs, crime, etc.
I think maybe today, by sheer numbers, more citizens are affected by internet usage than all of the other issues, yet we rarely know where our elected reps stand on the future of internet regulation, taxation, censorship, fees, hardware and software development rights, etc.
Also, I think we need to create a specialized area of legal expertise to handle these issues, as so many current attorneys and judges seem to have only the faintest idea of what truly matters and what is best in the public interest.

giafly says:

Re: Microsoft doesn't owe them

Re: I think you have an error in your story. Is this what you mean?: A federal appeals court partially reversed a lower-court decision that had exposed Microsoft to $565 million in damages.

It was not as simple as you think. In March 2005: “Both sides claimed victory in the mixed ruling, which reversed part of the lower-court ruling, affirmed other parts of it, vacated the decision as a whole and sent it back for a new trial.” The current case follows on from that.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...