Microsoft Patents Music Appreciation

from the double-groovy dept

theodp writes “Ever find yourself agreeing with a rock critic’s assessment that a certain Nirvana song is ‘angry’? If so, beware! From here on in, you could be infringing on Microsoft’s just-issued patent for Training a trainee to classify fundamental properties of media entities, which Microsoft explains covers teaching one to recognize that the Beastie Boys’ Hey Ladies is an example of a ‘fun song.'” And as you read the patent, it just gets better and better. The “process” involves a “double grooving” phase that allows the listener to become a “groover.” Well, isn’t that just double groovy? Does anyone actually read these patents?


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Microsoft Patents Music Appreciation”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
5 Comments
Dex says:

The system's broken

It’s really sad, isn’t it? Not only do we have the patent office issuing patents for such things, but the government is too corrupt to do anything at all about it. Every time any reform legislation comes along, those self-serving politicians twist it around until it just contributes to the problem even more.

Corruption can only persist so long before the government loses the image of legitimacy in the eyes of the people. The U.S. needs to shape up now because these patent issues that keep popping up stem from the much bigger problem, and that is one that threatens to plunge the entire country into chaos.

Anonymous Coward says:

Company or employee idea?

When I see such a lame patent being awarded to a large company I wonder if it’s really the company pushing for it or is it an employee’s idea that becomes the property of the company due to an employment contract. For example, the rather large company I work for has it so that they own ANY IP that employees create. Even if it completely developed on my own hours. (subject to laws) Either way, the awarding of the patent is stupid.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...