CueCat, Version Two?

from the oddly-complicated dept

Remember the CueCat? The absolutely useless magazine barcode scanner that the magazine industry thought was the next killer app for the web? The product made sense from a magazine industry standpoint, but no one ever stopped to think why any actual magazine reader would ever want to go through the cumbersome process of hooking up a special scanner to a computer, reading their magazines next to the computer, being so interested in an advertisement that you wanted to scan it, and then happily looking at another ad for the same product online. Over at TheFeature I’ve written up a longer piece wondering if a new effort by the magazine industry in Europe is the second coming of the CueCat. It’s yet another long, unclear process to somehow get you to look at more magazine advertising — without ever explaining why anyone would want to do this. In this case, the convoluted process is that someone, somehow (they suggest via friend, radio or billboard) is given a keyword. For some, totally unclear reason, the person then takes that keyword and sends it via SMS to a special number. At the other end, that service (which, apparently you’ve already signed up for, because it has your email address), sees what keyword you’ve sent in, and sends you an email (not to your phone) with a special link to an online magazine, formatted using one of those funky online magazine products that lets you “flip” the pages like a paper magazine. So, you get a keyword, send in a text message, and the next time you’re at your computer you’ll have a random email message telling you to go a magazine’s website. And, in some cases, they expect you to pay for this as well. Did the people creating this ever stop to ask “why?” anyone would ever do this?

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “CueCat, Version Two?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Tim (user link) says:

Re: No Subject Given

Not really, if you’re considering either UCE or UBE to be reasonable definitions of “spam mail” (I go with the latter). It may, of course, be junk to a particular viewer; it may be susceptible to abuse causing it to have bulk and/or unsolicited nature if you (somehow) spray the mails off to third-party recipients who didn’t ask for them.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...