FCC Not Happy About TV Product Payola

from the and-so-it-goes dept

Last month the Wall Street Journal “broke” the widely known story that the various TV personalities you see on shows talking about products are often paid to do so by the companies who make those products. While it happens with all sorts of products, technology products are clearly a big part of the practice. One month later, the FCC has woken up to this story and realized that (oh, look at that) such practices probably violate “payola” laws. The networks are claiming they had no knowledge that the presenters were being paid, but apparently the FCC doesn’t care — noting that they put the people on their show, and it should have been their job to ask. Of course, it’s a bit ironic that the FCC is now taking action on this type of payola, while the whole reason for the laws, music payola, seems to still be going strong.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC Not Happy About TV Product Payola”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
1 Comment
TJ says:

No Subject Given

I fail to see how this is that different than sponsorship where celebs constantly talk up a product. Okay, if the person claims to be doing independent reviews or a journalist presenting an advertisement as fact, then yes that’s a problem. But a guest on a talk show mentions a product because they were paid to? Meh.

Don’t we already assume that people are being paid when they promote a product. Do celebs even go on talk shows if they aren’t promoting something? Seems pretty rare to me. Seriously, after Diane Sawyer interviewed the pets.com sock puppet on that morning show during the ‘net boom it was obvious that any mention of companies and products in the broadcast medium should be viewed as a likely paid shill. Unless it is truly presented as news, so what? The original radio payola problem seems more like something worth addressing, while radio still exists in its current form.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...