Banning Driver Distractions, One By One

from the and-so-it-goes... dept

We’ve been falsely accused in the past of supporting the idea that people should be allowed to drive while yakking without any restrictions. The real issue isn’t whether people should be allowed to talk, but what is actually being banned, and whether or not it actually solves any real problem. Banning driving while yakking is politically popular, but it ignores the bigger issue of distracted driving, by focusing on just one cause of distracted drivers. In fact, some early supporters of anti-driving and yakking laws have changed their minds after realizing that it hasn’t made the roads any safer, and, in fact, has created new distractions (such as putting on the hands free kit). Of course, instead of actually dealing with the action of bad driving, it looks like lawmakers are getting exactly the wrong message and, instead, are looking to just outlaw other distractions, one by one. I’m not a smoker, but it’s hard to see how banning smoking while driving will really have much of an impact. Why not just ban bad driving? Oh wait, we already do. Of course, the smoking ban is in Germany… the same nation where it’s legal to have sex while driving. No wonder there are so many smoking drivers.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Banning Driver Distractions, One By One”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
2 Comments
Precision Blogger (user link) says:

"Society for the Prevention of Decency to Animals"

For several years – long ago – the American press was taken in by a hoaxter who claimed to represent a large organization with a weird name (I may have it right), the “Society for the Prevention of Decency to Animals”. The society was certain that many auto accidents were caused by drivers distracted by the sight animals’ sexual parts. The society called for all animals longer than 6″ and taller than 4″ to be decently clothed.
– Precision Blogger
http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply to Precision Blogger Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...