Washington State Tries New Tack On Anti-Spyware Law
from the is-it-really-that-different? dept
Attempts to outlaw spyware haven’t exactly had a great track record (see California and Congress, for example). But Washington state thinks it has a better, simpler answer to the problem: create a new crime called “computer trespassing” rather than define the activities of the spyware itself. The state rep who sponsored the bill says, “It’s really a simple question: Did you have permission to put that on my property? If not, it’s a crime.” The bill exempts anyone who has upfront permission to access the computer. Sounds more like semantics than anything. The federal proposal similarly required user permission to download software, but raised objections that it could thwart or hamper legitimate products. Besides, a more significant problem is enforcement — purveyors of spyware are not the easiest folks to catch. The Washington bill has the backing of the state’s big tech interests and is expected to be signed into law soon by the governor. It will be interesting to see if the straightforward approach has any noticeable impact.
Comments on “Washington State Tries New Tack On Anti-Spyware Law”
semantics? I'm always up to semantics
Let the browser cookie-wars commence!
Washington State Tries New Tack On Anti-Spyware La
Your article states: “The federal proposal similarly required user permission to download software, but raised objections that it could thwart or hamper legitimate products.”
Just which “legitimate products” put crap on my computer without my permission? Anyone who puts crap on my computer without my permission needs to be punished severely. Putting crap into my computer is like breaking into my house a taking a dump on the floor. Serious punishment. These people need to be banned from using any computer for a long, long, time. The filthy bastards!