DirecTV Finally Realizes Satellite Internet Isn't So Good

from the took-'em-long-enough dept

It only cost them a $1.6 billion write-off, but despite years of evidence, it looks like DirecTV has just now realized that they’re better off offering TV programming over satellites than trying to cram internet access over satellites. For years, the satellite providers keep trying to do internet access, but the latency issue and other problems have proven to be too big — as other alternatives have made the need for satellite based internet mostly disappear.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DirecTV Finally Realizes Satellite Internet Isn't So Good”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mike Schell (user link) says:

aw crap

I moved out here into the country 3 and a half years ago and it looked then as if satellite internet was going to be my saviour, once the prices came down. Prices always come down with this stuff right? Guess not. I suppose the 8% of Canadians (and their American counterparts) who live in the boonies were all waiting for the same thing. Not enough early adopters to pay for the satellite companies’ mammoth investments.
So it’s 26.4 Kbps bandwidth for me, until I figure out how to build and launch my own satellite.

Rhelic (user link) says:

Re: aw crap

Even out in the country I would think you could get a faster than 26.4k connection. Are you using some crappy stock 56k or something really high quality? Back when I was on dial-up (1999 or so) US Robotics were unquestionably the best and would boost my signal quality at least 30%-50% better than other brands.

I know 3Com purchased US Robotics a long time ago and by now have probably gutted/changed all their hardware. So I’m sure the new modems aren’t as good as the old ones.

Rhelic (user link) says:

No Subject Given

It’s sad to whine about country grade internet access. Assuming your an adult, you have choosen to live in that area and expect your level of quality to be directly related to the customer density and DON’T expect that level of quality to change anytime soon.

Although you never know, it took Time Warner buying out our local cable provider to get cable TV on my parent’s road back in 1995. Then they upgraded the lines only a few years later to lay the way for next gen technologies being digital cable & Road Runner.

Maybe somebody will buy out Time Warner and be even more aggressive with low density areas.

2shane says:



You should come live in Australia, with a crooked monopolising company called Telstra, being privatised, for dirty deals by our crooked politicians, with most of the country full of rotten electrics, even in the big cities…..

And the country….

Forget it.

The USA is not the only country that has a corrupt imbeciel running it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »